Investor Behaviour as a Driver of Financial Market Bubbles: A Review of the Behavioural Finance Literature
Authors
Associate Professor, Amity Business School, Amity University Kolkata (India)
Professor, Department of Education, Swami Vivekananda University, Barrackpore (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900663
Subject Category: Financial Management
Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 9681-9695
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-10-02
Accepted: 2026-10-07
Published: 2026-10-20
Abstract
Purpose – This review examines the role of investor behaviour in the formation and bursting of financial-market bubbles from a behavioural-finance perspective. It synthesises evidence concerning behavioural foundations, cognitive biases, investor sentiment and herding, speculative trading and leverage, and the influence of digital information environments and retail-investor participation.
Design/methodology/approach – A thematic literature review was adopted to integrate findings from behavioural finance research. The analysis considers how individual psychological biases interact with social, informational, technological, and market-structural factors to generate and sustain speculative price dynamics.
Findings – The review indicates that overconfidence, representativeness, anchoring, confirmation bias, availability bias, and loss aversion shape risk perceptions, expectations, and trading decisions, thereby encouraging speculative behaviour. However, bubbles rarely arise from a single cognitive bias. Rather, biases interact with investor sentiment, social influence, herding, informational cascades, and positive-feedback trading, converting individual tendencies into collective market dynamics. Speculation, leverage, and limits to arbitrage further amplify price deviations. Digital platforms, social media, online investment communities, and financial influencers increasingly accelerate information diffusion, attention, herding, and fear of missing out, particularly among retail investors in India. Bubble bursting involves expectation shifts, fear, panic, loss aversion, forced selling, deleveraging, and liquidity contraction.
Originality/value – The review proposes a multilevel behavioural framework linking individual psychology, collective behaviour, digital information, speculative trading, market structure, and institutional conditions. It highlights the need for financial literacy, investor protection, effective regulation, and behavioural-market surveillance to strengthen financial-market stability.
Keywords
Behavioural Biases and Decision Making, Behavioural Investment management, Behavioural Economics, Behavioural Risk Management, Information and Market Efficiency
Downloads
References
1. Adrian, T., & Shin, H. S. (2010). Liquidity and leverage. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19(3), 418–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2008.12.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2006). Investor sentiment and the cross-section of stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(4), 1645–1680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00885.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2007). Investor sentiment in the stock market. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.2.129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behaviour. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000). Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 773–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2008). All that glitters: The effect of attention and news on the buying behaviour of individual and institutional investors. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(2), 785–818. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm079 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Barberis, N., & Thaler, R. H. (2003). A survey of behavioural finance. In G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. M. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of finance (Vol. 1, pp. 1053–1128). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0102(03)01027-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026. https://doi.org/10.1086/261849 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Brunnermeier, M. K., & Pedersen, L. H. (2009). Market liquidity and funding liquidity. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2201–2238. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn098 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. De Long, J. B., Shleifer, A., Summers, L. H., & Waldmann, R. J. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets. Journal of Political Economy, 98(4), 703–738. https://doi.org/10.1086/261703 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Devenow, A., & Welch, I. (1996). Rational herding in financial economics. European Economic Review, 40(3–5), 603–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00073-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Fama, E. F. (1991). Efficient capital markets: II. The Journal of Finance, 46(5), 1575–1617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Jegadeesh, N., & Titman, S. (1993). Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04702.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Kiyotaki, N., & Moore, J. (1997). Credit cycles. Journal of Political Economy, 105(2), 211–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/262072 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Palan, S. (2013). A review of bubbles and crashes in experimental asset markets. Journal of Economic Surveys, 27(3), 570–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Shiller, R. J. (2000). Irrational exuberance. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Shiller, R. J. (2003). From efficient markets theory to behavioural finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003321164967 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). The limits of arbitrage. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03807.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioural model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Influence of Malaysia Firm Size on Financial Performance in ICT Sector
- Navigating Climate-Related Risks and Sustainable Finance: A Critical Review of ESG Transformation in Malaysian Plam Oil Industry
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Financial Decision-Making and Investment Behaviour among Individual Investors in India: The Roles of Perceived Accuracy, Trust, Risk and Financial Literacy