Perceived Contentment of Residents on Recreational Park as Shared Space

Authors

Azwin Aksan

Faculty of Hotel and Tourism, Universiti Teknologi MARA Melaka (Malaysia)

Rusliadi

Department of Public Administration, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar (Indonesia)

Nik Rozilaini Wan Mohamed

Faculty of Hotel and Tourism, Universiti Teknologi MARA Melaka (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.100900892

Subject Category: Tourism Destination Management and Marketing

Volume/Issue: 10/9 | Page No: 12744-12753

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-10-09

Accepted: 2026-10-14

Published: 2026-10-26

Abstract

As tourism expands into urban areas, recreational parks are increasingly evolving into shared spaces where residents and tourists converge, creating spatial friction. This study examines local residents' perceived contentment at a botanical park in Malaysia across three dimensions; the natural environment, accessibility, and park facilities. Data were collected through an intercept survey of 118 adult resident visitors. Results indicated overall low resident contentment, recording a mean score of 2.95, and notable accessibility disruption with a mean score of 2.56. Pearson correlation analysis showed that perception toward park facilities had the strongest positive relationship with contentment at a coefficient of 0.394, followed by natural environment concerns at 0.301 and accessibility at 0.246. These findings demonstrate that resident discontentment stems primarily from infrastructure overload rather than tourist presence alone. Consequently, municipal authorities should implement adaptive spatial zoning, prioritize facility maintenance, and manage visitor flows to preserve local quality of life.

Keywords

Recreational parks, residents' contentment, tourist-resident shared space, accessibility, park facilities.

Downloads

References

1. Ali, M.M., Ali, A.A., & Suparman, S. (2022). Evaluation of public green open space utilization in Baolan District, Tolitoli Regency. Katalogis, 10(1), 35-42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Carmona, M. (2021, 3rd ed.). Public Places Urban Spaces: The Dimensions of Urban Design. New York: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cheng, X., Li, J., Sun, X., & Yang, X. (2026). Exploring tourists’ leisure-walking perceptions and streetscape affordances: Insight from street view images and machine learning. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 12(3), 1026-1047. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dong, Z., Zhao, K., Ren, M., Ge, J., & Chan, I.J.S. (2022). The impact of space design on occupants’ satisfaction with indoor environment in university dormitories. Building & Environment, 218, Article 109143. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Hamzah, M., Krishna, S., & Rusli, N. (2024). Attributes and activities in public urban spaces of Malaysian cities. Planning Malaysia, 22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Huang, W., Luo, M., & Li, S. (2021). The influence of green space characteristics on urban park visitors’ satisfaction. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 64, 127267. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N., & Hansen, R. (2022). Principles for urban nature-based solutions. AMBIOA Journal of the Human Environment, 51(9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Ko, D., & Park, J. (2021). Residents’ perceptions of tourism development and their satisfaction with urban public spaces. Sustainability, 13(9), 4802. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Li, X., & Wang, C. (2023). Understanding the relationship between tourists’ perception of the authenticity of traditional village cultural landscapes and behavioural intentions, mediated by memorable tourism experiences and place attachment. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 28(3), 254-273. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Liu, Y., Zhang, H., & Wu, J. (2023). Investigating Resident – Tourist Sharing of Urban Public Recreation Space and Its Influencing Factors. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 13(9), 305. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Lyu, Y., Chakraborthy, S., & Bodenheimer, B. (2020). Determining peripersonal space boundaries and their plasticity in relation o object and agent characteristics in an immersive virtual environment. IEEE Transactions on Visualization & Computer Graphics, 26 (11), 3329-3339. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Song, H. & Shim, C. (2021). Comparing resident and tourist perceptions of an urban park: a latent profile analysis of perceived place value. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(7), 1180–1192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Tan, Z., Xiao, L., & Xi, J. (2021). Determinants to parking mode alternatives: A model integrating technology acceptance and satisfaction-loyalty frameworks. Transportation Research Part A: Policy & Practice, 153, 211-226. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Thinh, D.D., Xuan, N.V., & Giang, N.N.L. (2020). Impact of the physical environment on user behaviours in Urban District Park. Journal of Urban & Environmental Engineering, 13(2), 336-352. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Veitch, J., Ball, K., Abbott, G., & Salmon, J. (2021). Park improvements and their impact on park use and satisfaction: A natural experiment. Landscape and Urban Planning, 215, 104212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Wang, D., Brown, G., & Liu, Y. (2020). The physical and social features of urban green spaces and their effects on user satisfaction. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 48, 126576. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Zhang, Z., & Guo, M. (2022). Change of tourism organizations: Implications from a review of cultural tourism research. Frontiers Psychology, 13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zhang, H., Xu, H., & Li, M. (2022). Resident satisfaction and support in urban shared tourism spaces: A case study of recreational parks. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 24, 100735. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zhao, J., Aziz, F.A., & Ujang, N. (2024) Factors influencing the usage, restrictions, accessibility, and preference of urban neighborhood parks: A review of the empirical evidence. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 98, 128392. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Zheng, J., Hu, M., Qi, J., Han, B., Wang, H., & Xu, F. (2023). The spatial association between residents’ leisure activities and tourism activities using colocation pattern measures: A case study of Nanjing, China. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12 (6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zhu, Y. (2025). Contested sacred space: state power, spatial politics and heritage tourism. Tourism Geographies, 1-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles