Age Differences and Emotional Maturity: Age Gaps’ Influence on Emotional Maturity Conflict Resolution, and Relationship Satisfaction

Emotional maturity is a central determinant of relationship quality, influencing how partners communicate, manage conflict, and maintain satisfaction over time. Age differences between partners are often believed to shape emotional development and relational stability; however, research findings remain mixed regarding whether such differences enhance or diminish relational outcomes. This study examines how age gaps between partners influence emotional maturity, conflict resolution styles, and overall relationship satisfaction. A mixed-methods design was employed to integrate both quantitative and qualitative insights. Quantitative data were collected from 260 married individuals representing varied age-gap categories (0–5 years, 6–10 years, and above 10 years), while qualitative interviews were conducted with 25 couples to explore lived experiences. Regression and thematic analyses revealed that moderate age gaps (6–10 years) were associated with higher emotional maturity, better conflict resolution, and greater satisfaction compared to both small and large disparities. Key factors influencing these outcomes included empathy, communication, respect, and adaptability. The study concludes that while emotional maturity tends to increase with age and experience, relationship success depends more on interpersonal skills and shared understanding than chronological difference. The findings underscore the need for emotional intelligence training and premarital counseling that emphasize empathy, respect, and collaborative problem-solving.

Age Differences; Emotional Maturity; Conflict Resolution; Relationship Satisfaction

1. Adu-Gyamfi, S., & Arko, J. (2021). Marital harmony and generational differences among couples in Ghana: The moderating role of communication. Ghana Journal of Social Sciences, 17(2), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Amoah, R., & Osei, F. (2022). Age differences and marital balance: Cultural insights from Ghanaian couples. African Journal of Family Studies, 10(3), 214–232. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Buss, D. M. (2017). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (4th ed.). Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. W. W. Norton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hendel, D. D. (2012). Conflict management and age-related communication patterns in long-term relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Dynamics, 6(4), 331–348. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lehmiller, J. J., & Agnew, C. R. (2008). May–December paradoxes: An exploration of age-gap relationships in the United States. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(5), 643–662. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mensah, D., & Boateng, P. (2021). Emotional intelligence, spirituality, and marital satisfaction in Ghanaian marriages. Journal of Family and Cultural Psychology, 14(3), 184–200. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Myers, J. E., & Demchak, M. A. (2019). Emotional maturity and satisfaction in nontraditional relationships: The mediating role of conflict resolution. Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy, 45(4), 567–581. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Nguyen, M. T., & Williams, K. (2020). Bridging generational differences through empathy and adaptability in romantic relationships. Journal of Family Relations, 69(3), 480–493. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ofori, J., & Badu, E. (2020). Religious values, social expectations, and satisfaction in age-disparate marriages. Ghana Journal of Religion and Culture, 8(1), 72–93. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Rahim, M. A. (1983). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368–376. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (2001). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 167–177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Sprecher, S., Brooks, K., & Dupree, B. (2019). Communication and satisfaction among couples with varying age differences. Interpersonal Relationships Review, 11(1), 45–63. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Watson, L. A. (2019). Relationship satisfaction in age-diverse partnerships: The role of emotional intelligence and empathy. Journal of Social Psychology, 22(4), 300–317. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Winch, R. F. (1958). Mate selection: A study of complementary needs. Harper & Row. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Empowering SME Performance Through Social Media: The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Malaysian Manufacturing SMEs
• Effective School Bullying Prevention Strategies: A Thematic Review
• Impact of Workplace Conflict on the Operational Performance of Deposit Money Banks in Enugu State.
• Towards Digital Financial Solutions: A Conceptual Model of SME Strategies and Strategic Development
• Effect of Work-Life Balance and Affective Commitment on Employee Performance in the Hotel Industry in Plateau State