Protection of Traditional Knowledge of Indigenous Community in Bangladesh: A Critical Analysis on the Legal Framework
Authors
Lecturer, Department of Law, Faculty of Law, Primeasia University, 12 Kamal Ataturk Avenue, Banani, Dhaka (Bangladesh)
Article Information
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-02
Accepted: 2025-11-08
Published: 2025-11-18
Abstract
Nestled amidst the verdant hills and vibrant cultural tapestry of Bangladesh, indigenous communities stand as the vibrant threads weaving a rich heritage of resilience and tradition. This essay delves into the heart of this cultural mosaic, exploring the significance of Indigenous Traditional Knowledge (TK) that intricately shapes the lives of these communities in agriculture, medicine, music, literature, and home decor. Indigenous peoples, custodians of ancestral wisdom, face a pressing challenge — the exploitation of their TK by external entities for commercial gains without due benefit to the original owners. This paper illuminates the insufficiency of existing legal protection for indigenous traditional knowledge and articulates the far-reaching consequences of this oversight. Focusing on the nexus between indigenous heritage and legal frameworks, the essay proposes a compelling argument for aligning Bangladesh's domestic laws with international legal obligations. The need for supplementary provisions to fortify implementation mechanisms within relevant statutes is underscored. By highlighting the gaps in the legal landscape, this essay advocates for a transformative approach that ensures the equitable protection and preservation of Indigenous Traditional Knowledge. In essence, the essay serves as a clarion call for legal reforms, urging Bangladesh to fortify its commitment to the preservation of indigenous heritage, fostering a future where the vibrant threads of tradition are shielded from exploitation, and the tapestry of resilience continues to flourish.
Keywords
Traditional knowledge, Convention on Biological Diversity, Nagoya Protocol, benefit-sharing, prior informed consent
Downloads
References
1. Statutes, Regulations and Policies [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. The draft of Biodiversity and Community Knowledge Protection Act, 1998, Bangladesh [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Biodiversity Act 2019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Draft Patent Act 2019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. The Copyright Act 2000 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Trademarks Act 2009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. The Geographical Indications (Registration and Protection) Act, 2013. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. TRIPS Agreement [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Nagoya Protocol [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Biodiversity Law 1998 (Costa Rica) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Books [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Gphillips, ‘Issues and Options for Traditional Knowledge Holders in Protecting Their Intellectual Property’ (IP Handbook of Best Practices - IP Handbook Chapter 16, 11 June 2016) https://ipmall.law.unh.edu/content/ip-handbook-best-practices-ip-handbook-chapter-16 accessed 22 November 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Hansen SA (Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property: A Handbook on Issues and Options for Traditional Knowledge Holders in Protecting Their Intellectual Property and Maintaining Biological Diversity ) <https://dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files4/b8ec9786c91ee3361589833721d9abca.pdf> accessed 9 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Stephen A. Hansen and Justin W. VanFleet, ‘Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property: A Handbook on Issues and Options for Traditional Knowledge Holders in Protecting their Intellectual Property and Maintaining Biological Diversity’, American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2003, Washington, DC, pp-3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Stokes S, ‘Art and Copyright’ (Google Books, 11 March 2021) <https://books.google.com/books/about/Art_and_Copyright.html?id=jN4fEAAAQBAJ>> accessed 6 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Wipo handbook on Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expression-A guide for countries in transition <https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4108> [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Journal Articles [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Cullet, P. et al. Intellectual property rights, plant genetic resources, and traditional knowledge.(2006) < https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353872224> [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Chen CW and Gilmore M, ‘Biocultural Rights: A New Paradigm for Protecting Natural and Cultural Resources of Indigenous Communities’ (The International Indigenous Policy Journal) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Correa CM (‘Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property: Issues and Options Surrounding the Protection of Traditional Knowledge’) https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Traditional-knowledge-and-intellectual-property%3A-of-Correa/9cb87789d0d534d03592d7c9d701cb8f23c8b8e accessed 7 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Dhamai B, ‘An Overview of Indigenous Peoples in Bangladesh’ (Academia.edu, 11 July 2018) < https://www.thedailystar.net/law-our-rights/rights-indigenous-peoples-bangladesh-1266478> accessed 1 September 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Dagne TW, ‘Law and Policy on Intellectual Property, Traditional Knowledge and Development: Legally Protecting Creativity and Collective Rights in Traditional Knowledge-Based Agricultural Products through Geographical Indications’ (SSRN, 6 May 2010) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Feng S, ‘How Are Unregistered Trademarks Protected in China? - IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law’ (SpringerLink, 26 September 2013) < https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-013-0106-6> accessed 7 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Ikechi Mgbeoji, (Patents and Traditional Knowledge of the Uses of Plants: Is a Communal Patent Regime Part of the Solution to the Scourge of Bio Piracy) Indian Journal of Global Legal Studies 163, 172. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Improving the Jhum System in bangladesh - research gate) <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/40106659_Improving_the_jhum_system_in_Bangladesh> accessed 23 October 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. (Indigenous Knowledge Development in Bangladesh: Present and future ...) https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Indigenous-Knowledge-Development-in-Bangladesh%3A-and-Sillitoe/9229d4dab6bdff01959a2e3572689d61f26bbcc4 accessed 2 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Kamrul Hossain & Rosa Maria Ballardini , ‘Protecting Indigenous Traditional Knowledge Through a Holistic Principle-Based Approach’(2021), Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 39:1, 51-72, DOI: 10.1080/18918131.2021.1947449 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Legal protection of traditional knowledge: comparative study of Bangladesh, Australia and Indonesia https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364654480_Legal_Protection_of_Traditional_Knowledge_Comparative_Study_of_Bangladesh_Australia_and_Indonesia accessed 6 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Md. Razidur Rahman, ‘Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions in Bangladesh’ (2015) 20 Journal of Intellectual Property Rights 164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Michael C. Ogwezzy, ‘Protection of Indigenous or Traditional Knowledge Under Intellectual Property Laws: An Examination of the Efficacy of Copyright Law, Trade Secret and SUI Generis Rights (2012) International and Comparative Law Review.’ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Mohammad Towhidul Islam & Moniruz Zaman, ‘Protection of Traditional Knowledge: Finding an Appropriate Legal Framework for Bangladesh’ (2020) Dhaka University Law Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 29-48 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Mohiuddin, M. and Alam, Md.K. (no date) ‘Opportunities of traditional knowledge in natural resource management experiences from in the Chittagong hill tracts, Bangladesh’, Indian journal of traditional knowledge. , 10, pp.474480.<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290790389_Opportunities_of_traditional_knowledge_in_natural_resource_management_experiences_from_in_the_Chittagong_hill_tracts_Bangladesh/citation/download> [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. Ogwezzy MC ((PDF) protection of indigenous or traditional knowledge under ...) <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322707428_Protection_of_Indigenous_or_Traditional_Knowledge_Under_Intellectual_Property_Laws_An_Examination_of_the_Efficacy_of_Copyright_Law_Trade_Secret_and_SUI_Generis_Rights> accessed 9 September 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Opportunities of traditional knowledge in natural resource management https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Md-Alam-436/publication/290790389_Opportunities_of_traditional_knowledge_in_natural_resource_management_experiences_from_in_the_Chittagong_hill_tracts_Bangladesh/links/60d800f0458515d6fbe02181/Opportunities-of-traditional-knowledge-in-natural-resource-management-experiences-from-in-the-Chittagong-hill-tracts-Bangladesh. Accessed 6 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Protection of traditional names and designations https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Protection-of-Traditional-Names-and-Designations-Knaak-Kur/fb20732901f0858128f7503e8a9000890276ec12 accessed 7 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Protection of Indigenous or Traditional Knowledge under Intellectual Property Laws: An Examination of the Efficacy of Copyright Law, Trade Secret and SUI Generis Rights. (2012) International and Comparative Law Review [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Preservation and Protection of Traditional Knowledge – Diverse Documentation Initiatives across the Globe)<https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280564503_Preservation_and_Protection_of_Traditional_Knowledge_-_Diverse_Documentation_Initiatives_across_the_Globe> accessed 7 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. Oguamanam C, ‘Documentation and Digitization of Traditional Knowledge and Intangible Cultural Knowledge: Challenges and Prospects’ (SSRN, 20 July 2013) <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2296199> accessed 8 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Razidur Rahman, Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions in Bangladesh (2015). Journal of Intellectual Property Rights, Vol. 20, pp. 164-171, May 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2827043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Rashid, Saifur. (2010). ‘Indigenous fishing knowledge: the changing fishing technology and techniques among the Koibortta flood-plain fishers of northeast Bangladesh.’ 58-68. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Raustiala K and Munzer SR, ‘The Global Struggle over Geographic Indications’ (SSRN, 23 August 2006) <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=925751>> accessed 2 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Redvers N and others, ‘Indigenous Peoples: Traditional Knowledges, Climate Change, and Health’ (PLOS Global Public Health)< https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pgph.0002474> accessed 7 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Tri AT and Joko Setiyono (Legal protection of traditional knowledge < https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364654480_Legal_Protection_of_Traditional_Knowledge_Comparative_Study_of_Bangladesh_Australia_and_Indonesia> accessed 7 September 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Online Reports [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. ‘Bangladesh - National Environment Management Action Plan (NEMAP) (Vol. 2)’ (World Bank) https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/329001468741610744/bangladesh-national-environment-management-action-plan-nemap accessed 6 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Macbeth S, ‘Recording and Using Indigenous Knowledge : A Manual’ (Recording and using indigenous knowledge : a manual | Participatory Methods) < https://www.participatorymethods.org/resource/recording-and-using-indigenous-knowledge-manual> accessed 6 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Girsberger MA (Legal protection of traditional cultural expressions: A policy Perspective September 2008) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. UNPFII sixth session for Indigenous Peoples (no date) United Nations. Available at: < https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/unpfii-sessions-2/sixth.html > (Accessed: 21 September 2023). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
49. Websites [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
50. Antony Seeger (Intellectual property and cultural rights: A conversation with Anthony Seegar) <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10588167.2020.1710380> accessed 9 October 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
51. (African model legislation for the protection of the rights of local communities, farmers and breeders, and for the regulation of access to biological resources)l< https://wipolex-res.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/oau/oau001en.html> accessed 8 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
52. ‘Biopiracy (Article) | Ethical Concerns’ (Khan Academy) << https://www.khanacademy.org/science/learn-to-clone-a-sheep-and-more/xb1ef3389afa1715a:biotechnology-and-its-applications/xb1ef3389afa1715a:ethical-concerns/a/biopiracy> accessed 24 October 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
53. Bio piracy (Wikipedia, 28 October 2023) <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biopiracy> accessed > 1 September 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
54. Bonn Guidelines on Access to Genetic Resources and Fair and Equitable Sharing of the [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
55. Benefits Arising out of their Utilization https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-bonn-gdls-en.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
56. CBD guidelines Akwé: KON Guidelines - Convention on Biological Diversity) < https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/akwe-brochure-en.pdf>> [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
57. Downis DR, ‘How Intellectual Property Could Be a Tool to Protect Traditional Knowledge’ (HeinOnline, 8 March 2021) https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals%2Fcjel25 accessed 7 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
58. Fao.Org’ (Free, Prior and Informed Consent) < https://www.fao.org/indigenous-peoples/our-pillars/fpic/en/> accessed 1 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
59. Imtiaz Ahmed Sajal and others, ‘International Law on Access and Benefit-Sharing: Bangladesh’ (Bangladesh Law Digest (BDLD), 13 November 2020) < https://bdlawdigest.org/access-and-benefit-sharing-bangladesh.html> accessed 4 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
60. ‘Indigenous Peoples Rights Are Human Rights.’ (Amnesty International, 18 September 2023) <https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/indigenous-peoples/> accessed 23 October 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
61. Indigenous Peoples’ (Wikipedia, 18 September 2023) <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples> accessed 23 October 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
62. Indigenous Knowledge Theories’ (sitwe, 1 January 2020) < https://sitwe.wordpress.com/2019/12/28/indigenous-knowledge-theories> accessed 1 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
63. ‘Jhum’ (Wikipedia, 27 November 2023) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jhum accessed 5 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
64. Masenya TM, ‘Decolonization of Indigenous Knowledge Systems in South Africa: Impact of Policy and Protocols’ (International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 1 January 2022) https://www.igi-global.com/article/decolonization-of-indigenous-knowledge-systems-in-south-africa/310005 accessed 4 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
65. Model Provisions for National Laws on the Protection of Expressions of Folklore Against Illicit Exploitation and Other Forms of Prejudicial Action, 1982’ (WIPO Lex) <https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text/186459> accessed 8 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
66. Nason JD, ‘Traditional Property and Modern Laws: The Need for Native American Community Intellectual Property Rights Legislation’ (HeinOnline, 8 March 2021) https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals%2Fstanlp12&div=25&id=&page=> accessed 7 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
67. Overview: The TRIPS Agreement’ (WTO) <https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/intel2_e.htm#:~:text=The%20TRIPS%20Agreement%20requires%20Member,novelty%2C%20inventiveness%20and%20industrial%20applicability.> accessed 5 September 2023. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
68. Principles & Guidelines for the Protection of the Heritage of Indigenous People’ (Principles & Guidelines for the Protection of the Heritage of Indigenous People | Alaska Native Knowledge Network)< https://www.uaf.edu/ankn/indigenous-knowledge-syst/principles-guidelines-for> accessed 8 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
69. Ruiz MM, ‘The Legal Protection of Widely Shared and Dispersed Traditional Knowledge’ (Taylor & Francis, 14 July 2017) <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315666358-7/legal-protection-widely-shared-dispersed-traditional-knowledge-muller-manuel-ruiz> accessed 7 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
70. ‘Sui Generis’ (Wikipedia, 29 November 2023) < https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sui_generis> ; accessed 24 November 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
71. ‘Traditional Cultural Expressions’ (WIPO) <https://www.wipo.int/tk/en/folklore/> accessed 23 October 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
72. Trips agreement of the WTO - Cambridge scholars publishing) https://www.cambridgescholars.com/resources/pdfs/978-1-4438-4834-3-sample.pdf accessed 7 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
73. ‘Teak’ (Wikipedia, 24 November 2023) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teak accessed 5 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
74. The Commercial Use of Biodiversity : Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit-Sharing’ (The commercial use of biodiversity : access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing | IUCN Library System, 1 January 1999) <https://portals.iucn.org/library/node/24382> accessed 8 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
75. The Nagoya Protocol - Convention on Biological Diversity’ (DCCEEW) << https://www.dcceew.gov.au/science-research/australias-biological-resources/nagoya-protocol-convention biological#:~:text=The%20Nagoya%20Protocol%20establishes%20a,any%20benefits%20from%20their%20use> accessed 24 November 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
76. World Trade Organization’ (WTO) << https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/art27_3b_background_e.html> accessed 24 November 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
77. Warner-Lambert Pharm. Co. v. John J. Reynolds, Inc., 178 F. Supp. 655 (S.D.N.Y. 1959)’ (Justia Law) https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/178/655/1642490 accessed 7 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
78. Newspapers [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
79. Arif Ahmed,‘Rights of Indigenous Peoples in Bangladesh’ (The Daily Star, 8 August 2016) < https://www.thedailystar.net/law-our-rights/rights-indigenous-peoples-bangladesh-1266478> accessed 1 September 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
80. Farina I, ‘The Soul Sings Folk’ (The Daily Star, 24 February 2018) https://www.thedailystar.net/supplements/now-lifestyle/the-soul-sings-bangla-and-bangladesh-folk-songs-1539010 accessed 5 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
81. Kabita Chakma , ‘ Misappropriation of Ben products and protection of ‘Traditional Cultural Expressions’ ( Dhaka,26 October 2020) < https://www.newagebd.net/article/120039/misappropriation-of-ben-products-and-protection-of-traditional-cultural-expressions> 1 September 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
82. Lubaba T, ‘An Overview of Environmental Laws of Bangladesh’ (The Daily Star, 3 June 2019) https://www.thedailystar.net/law-our-rights/news/overview-environmental-laws-bangladesh-1753360 accessed 9 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
83. Mohammad Monirul Azam,’ Legal protection of Indigenous Intellectual Property Rights’ < https://archive.thedailystar.net/law/2009/08/03/index.htm> 1 September 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
84. ‘New Patent Law Passed in the Parliament’ (The Daily Star, 15 April 2022) https://www.thedailystar.net/law-our-rights/news/new-patent-law-passed-the-parliament-3005521 accessed 6 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
85. Sajal IA, ‘How Far the Biological Diversity Act 2017 Complies with International Obligations?’ (The Daily Star, 18 November 2019) < https://www.thedailystar.net/law-our-rights/news/how-far-the-biological-diversity-act-2017-complies-international-obligations-1829140> accessed 9 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
86. The Chittagong Hill Tracts Regulation and Its Constitutional Status (The Daily Star, 30 November 2020) https://www.thedailystar.net/law-our-rights/news/the-chittagong-hill-tracts-regulation-and-its-constitutional-status-2003809 accessed 6 December 2023 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
- Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
- The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
- An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
- The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.