Culture, Community and Policy as Contextual Enablers of Sustainable Tourism Technology: The Case of a Malaysian Heritage Waterfront

Authors

Haslinda Musa

Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (Malaysia)

Nur Zafirah A Khadar

Erada Solutions Sdn. Bhd. (Malaysia)

Nurulizwa Abdul Rashid

Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (Malaysia)

Samer Ali Hussein Al-Shami

Institute of Technology Management and Entrepreneurship (IPTK), Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (Malaysia)

Fadhlur Rahim Azmi

Faculty of Business and Management, UiTM Cawangan Melaka Kampus Bandaraya Melaka (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1014MG0206

Subject Category: Hospitality and Tourism

Volume/Issue: 10/14 | Page No: 2759-2769

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2026-10-21

Accepted: 2026-10-26

Published: 2026-11-04

Abstract

Research on sustainable tourism technology focuses mostly on whether tourists accept it. This study asks a different question: what in the destination's culture, community, and policy settings enables or blocks the spread of such technology? It examines the solar-powered river taxi (ePenambang) on the Kuala Terengganu heritage waterfront in Malaysia. A qualitative single case study combining document analysis of national and state policies, media reports from 2017 to 2026, and published studies of the case. Evidence was coded using Scott's three institutional pillars (regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive) and interpreted through the multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions. Culture is the strongest enabler: the bot penambang has run since the 1930s and remains a valued heritage attraction, giving a solar retrofit a legitimacy-ready platform. Community is fragile: the operator base has shrunk to about ten active boats run by an aging workforce on low incomes. Policy is fragmented: national green mobility policies focus on road transport and do not address waterborne tourism transport, while state support has been episodic. Tourists' willingness to use the boat is therefore not the binding constraint. Supply-side capacity is. The study shifts attention from tourist acceptance to the institutional conditions for diffusion and proposes a contextual enablers framework for green retrofits of heritage transport.

Keywords

heritage tourism; sustainable tourism technology; solar boat; institutional theory; multi-level perspective; community participation; tourism policy; Malaysia

Downloads

References

1. Bemelmans-Videc, M.-L., Rist, R. C., & Vedung, E. (Eds.). (1998). Carrots, sticks and sermons: Policy instruments and their evaluation. Transaction Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bernama. (2021a, March 21). 'Survival' pengusaha bot penambang tradisional. https://www.bernama.com/bm/news.php?id=1943820 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bernama. (2021b, June 14). Terengganu umum bantuan bulanan kepada pengayuh beca, pengusaha bot penambang. https://www.bernama.com/bm/news.php?id=1971843 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bigerna, S., Micheli, S., & Polinori, P. (2019). Willingness to pay for electric boats in a protected area in Italy: A sustainable tourism perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 603–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.266 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bramwell, B., & Lane, B. (2011). Critical research on the governance of tourism and sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.580586 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gössling, S., & Higham, J. (2021). The low-carbon imperative: Destination management under urgent climate change. Journal of Travel Research, 60(6), 1167–1179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520933679 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hall, C. M. (2011). Policy learning and policy failure in sustainable tourism governance: From first- and second-order to third-order change? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 649–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.555555 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Han, H. (2021). Consumer behavior and environmental sustainability in tourism and hospitality: A review of theories, concepts, and latest research. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(7), 1021–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1903019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lenzen, M., Sun, Y.-Y., Faturay, F., Ting, Y.-P., Geschke, A., & Malik, A. (2018). The carbon footprint of global tourism. Nature Climate Change, 8(6), 522–528. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0141-x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Lesar, L., & Weaver, D. (2022). A diffusion perspective on the discontinuance of sustainable tourism quality control tools. Journal of Travel Research, 61(5), 1043–1060. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211017232 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Malaysia Aktif. (2026, May 25). Bot penambang Seberang Takir terus jadi tarikan pelancong. https://malaysiaaktif.my/2026/05/bot-penambang-seberang-takir-terus-jadi-tarikan-pelancong/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Malaysian Green Technology and Climate Change Corporation. (2023). Low Carbon Mobility Blueprint (LCMB) 2021–2030. Retrieved October 6, 2026, from https://www.mgtc.gov.my/what-we-do/low-carbon-mobility-2/low-carbon-mobility-blueprint/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ministry of Economy Malaysia. (2023). National Energy Transition Roadmap. Ministry of Economy. https://www.iea.org/policies/18249-national-energy-transition-roadmap [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Ministry of Tourism, Arts and Culture Malaysia. (2020). National Tourism Policy 2020–2030. MOTAC. [Authors to add the official URL] [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Musa, H., Abdullah, A. R., Othman, M. N., Halil, N. H. A., Rashid, N., & Masrom, N. R. (2024). Fostering tourism resilience: Analyzing the characteristics of eBECA innovation and its diffusion in business continuity management. In B. Alareeni & A. Hamdan (Eds.), Technology and business model innovation: Challenges and opportunities (pp. [check]). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55911-2_44 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Musa, H., Abdullah, A. R., Othman, M. N., Rashid, N., & Azmi, F. R. (2025). Rethinking the technology acceptance model: A structural analysis of sustainable technology adoption in Malaysian tourism. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(9), 6125–6139. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Musa, H., Khadar, N. Z. A., & Azmi, F. R. (2026a). User characteristics and the adoption of electric beca (eBECA) technology in Malaysia's heritage tourism context. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 16(1), 453–478. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v16-i1/27378 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Musa, H., Khadar, N. Z. A., & Azmi, F. R. (2026b). Enhancing tourist awareness and preferences through eBECA: A digital empowerment approach. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 10(1), 772–783. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2026.10100067 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Okazaki, E. (2008). A community-based tourism model: Its conception and use. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 16(5), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580802159594 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ramkissoon, H., Smith, L. D. G., & Weiler, B. (2013). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviours: A structural equation modelling approach. Tourism Management, 36, 552–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Scott, D., Gössling, S., Hall, C. M., & Peeters, P. (2016). Can tourism be part of the decarbonized global economy? The costs and risks of alternate carbon reduction policy pathways. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 24(1), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2015.1107080 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Shahril, N. U. M. (2025). Investigating the influence of user characteristics on the adoption of sustainable technology in Malaysia's tourism industry [Bachelor's thesis, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Tosun, C. (2000). Limits to community participation in the tourism development process in developing countries. Tourism Management, 21(6), 613–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(00)00009-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. TRDI. (2017, October 10). Bot penambang makin cantik, jadi tarikan penumpang. https://www.trdi.my/bot-penambang-makin-cantik-jadi-tarikan-penumpang [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. TRDI. (2025, April 17). Pelan teknologi hijau siap dirangka. https://www.trdi.my/pelan-teknologi-hijau-siap-dirangka [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Utusan Malaysia. (2021, November 11). Terengganu perkenal perkhidmatan bot penambang secara VR. https://www.utusan.com.my/terkini/2021/11/terengganu-perkenal-perkhidmatan-bot-penambang-secara-vr/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wang, N. (1999). Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(2), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(98)00103-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Xu, X., & Wu, Q. (2026). The diffusion of new energy technology among the water sightseeing transportation industry: An evolutionary game perspective driven by tourists' low-carbon behavior. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13, 560. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06880-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Yi, X., Lin, V. S., Jin, W., & Luo, Q. (2017). The authenticity of heritage sites, tourists' quest for existential authenticity, and destination loyalty. Journal of Travel Research, 56(8), 1032–1048. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516675061 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles