Pedagogical Preferences in the Teaching of Agriculture in Inclusive Settings to Learners with Physical Challenges: The Case of Grade 6 Classes in Domboshava, Mashonaland East Province

This study sought to analyse facilitators’ pedagogical preferences in the teaching of Agriculture in inclusive Grade 6 Agriculture classes with specific reference to physically challenged learners. The researcher adopted a qualitative, descriptive case study design, which employed a triangulation of interviews, document analysis, and participant observation as data collection methods. A sample of three purposively sampled facilitators and ten learners from Domboshava, Mashonaland East, participated in the study. It emerged from the study that whilst some facilitators were aware of the need for individualization in inclusive classes, others were setting conditions for its provision. The study also revealed that whilst some facilitators exhibited sound subject-content knowledge, their pedagogical content knowledge left a lot to be desired. The application of learner-centred pedagogies like project-based learning (PBL), collaboration, demonstration, and question and answer was evident from the study. However, it also emerged that the application of such pedagogy was flawed. It was also clear from the study that physically challenged learners exhibited a relatively dwindling enthusiasm during the agriculture practical. Findings from the study implied that facilitators could do well by regarding the holistic study of the child as the basis for pedagogical selection. Facilitators might also need to apply differentiation as a responsive, inclusive pedagogy not only in Agriculture theory sessions but also in practical sessions. There might be a need for facilitators to practice reflective teaching to enhance pedagogical practices. Mainstream school administrators could also help the situation by maintaining the recommended facilitator: learner ratio for inclusive classes and also mobilising parents to augment schools’ efforts. Pre-service Teacher Education could also help by considering Special Needs Education as a stand-alone course in professional studies. Facilitators who have not gone through the Theory of Education courses are also encouraged to undertake various forms of Continuous Professional Development to enhance their pedagogical-content knowledge in handling classes with physical exceptionalities.

pedagogy, facilitator, agriculture

1. Alwa. H. A. (2014). Learning Styles and their Relation to Teaching Styles. International i. Journal of Language and Linguistics. Vol 2 (3), pp 241-245. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Antia, S. D., & Rivera, M. C. (2016). Instruction and service time decisions: Itinerant services to deaf and hard of hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 21(3), pp 293-302 available Online at http://www.onlineresearchjournals.org/IJER. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bukaliya, R. (2016). Agriculture in the Primary School Curriculum: Providing an impetus the impetus to the Zimbabwe Agenda for Sustainable Socio-Economic Transformation. International Open Distance Learning Journal. Vol 1 (1), pp 12- 28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Burke, P., Aubusson, P., Schuck, S., & Kearney, M. (2017). Exploring teacher pedagogy, stages of concern and accessibility as determinants of technology adoption. Technology Pedagogy and Education vol 27 (2), 149-163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Carter, J. M. & Fuller, C. (2016). Symbols, meaning and action: The past, present and future symbolic interactionism.Vol 64 (6) pp, 931-961. Also available journals.sagepub.com/doilabs/10.1177/0011392116638396? journalCode=csia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cattaneo, M. A., Oggenfuss, C. & Wolter, S.C. (2016). The More, the Better? The Impact of Instructional Time on Student Performance. Discussion Paper No. 9797. Germany: IZA [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. 7. Choy, L.T. (2014). The Strengths and Weaknesses of Research Methodology: Comparison and Complimentary between Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches: IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19 (4), 99-104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. (7th ed.). iLondon: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating i. quantitative and qualitative research. (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. 10. Creswell, J.W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating i. quantitative and qualitative research. (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. 11. Cuenca, A. (2010). Self-Study Research: Surfacing the Art of Pedagogy in Teacher Education. i. Journal of Inquiry and Action into Education. 3 (2), 151-291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. 12. Dagar, V. Y. & Yadaf, A. (2016). Constructivism: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. i. Arts and Social Science Journals. Vol 7 (4), pp 1-5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. 13. Gudjonsdottir, H. & Óskarsdóttir, O. (2016). Inclusive education, pedagogy and practice. i. Iceland: University of Iceland, School of Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. 14. Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single Case Studies vs. Multiple Case Studies: A Comparative Study. Academy of Business and Engineering and Science. Halmstad: Halmstad University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. 15. Hapanyengwi- Chemhuru, O., Makuvaza, N., and Mutasa, J. (2016). Hunhu: Making human rights education discourse relevant. Journal of Pan African Studies, vol 9 (2), pp 100-168. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. . Hapanyengwi-Chemhuru, O. (2013). Inclusion or Integration: Towards Conceptual Clarity in the provision of Special Needs education in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe Journal Educational Research, Vol. 25 (2), 201-216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. 17. Harris, D. R. & Fuller, D. Q. (2014). Agriculture: Definition and Overview. London: University College Press. International Journal of Social Science & Education. Vol. 3(4), pp 123-133. http: www.cbm.org/.../Jairos-Jiri_vocational-..... [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. 18. Husbands, C. & Peace, J. (2012). What makes great pedagogy? Nine claims from research. i. Michigan: National College for School Leadership. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. 19. James, M & Pollard A. (2011). TLRP’s ten principles for effective pedagogy: rationale, a. development, evidence, argument and impact. Research Papers in Education, 26 (3), b. 275-328. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. 20. Jenjekwa, V., Rutoro, E. and Runyowa, J. (2013). Inclusive Education and the Primary School i. Teacher Education Curriculum In Zimbabwe: The Need for A Paradigm Shift: ii. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies (ISSN 2321 -9203). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. 21. Lavy, V. (2015). Do differences in schools’ instructional time explain international a. achievement gaps? Evidence from developed and developing countries. The i. Economic Journal, Volume 125, (158), pp397-424. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. 22. Lehmann, T. & Ifenthaler, D. (2012). Influence of students’ learning styles on the effectiveness of instructional interventions. International Conference on Cognition & Exploratory Learning in Digital Age 2 (8), 180-189. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. 23. Loughran, A. (2006). Developing a pedagogy for Teacher Education: Understanding teaching a. and learning about teaching. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. 24. Mafa, O.M. (2012) Challenges of implementing inclusion in Zimbabwe’s Education System. a. Online Journal of Education Research. Volume 1(2), pp 14-22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Magwa, L and Jenjekwa, V. (2016). Handling Special Needs learners in Mainstream classes. a. The case of Chirumhanzu District, Zimbabwe. International Journal of English and b. Education. Vol 5(1), 184-192. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Manichander, T. (2015). Psychology of Learners and Learning. Maharashtra: Laxmi Book a. Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ministry of Higher and Tertiary Education, Science & Technology Development. Educationa. Doctrine 5.0. (2018). Harare: Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. .Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education (2016). The Handbook for Teacher Professional a. Standards. Harare: Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. Education Amendment Act (2020) section 68B a. of Cap 25:04. Harare: Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education. Curriculum Framework (2015-2022). Harare: a. Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Mohajan, H. K. (2017). Two criteria for Good Measurements in Research: Validity and a. Reliability. Annals of Spiru Haret University Economics Series, 17(3), 58-82.. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. 32. Oppong, S.H. (2013). The Problem of Sampling in Qualitative Research. Asian Journal of a. Management Sciences and Education. Vol 2 (1) pp, 202-209. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ozerem, A., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2015). Learning Environments Designed According to Learning Styles and its Effects on Mathematics Achievement. Eurasian Journal of Education Research. Vol 61 pp, 61-81. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Piaget, J. (1980). Adaptation and Intelligence. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Pramodini, V. K. & Anu, S. (2012). Evaluation for importance of research in education. a. International Journal of Social Science and Interdisciplinary Research. Vol 1. (9), b. pp 1-6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. 36. Rahman, M.S. (2017). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches and Methods in Language. “Testing and Assessment” Research: A Literature Review. Journal of Education and Learning, (61), 102-112. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ramaswamy, K. (2018). The right to Education: An analysis through the lens of the a. deontological method of Immanuel Kant. North-western Journal of Human Rights., b. 16 (1), pp 48-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. 38. Ramsook, L. & Thomas, M, (2016). Constructivism: Linking Theory with Practice among Pre- service Teachers at the University of Trinidad and Tobago. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Education Research. Vol 15 (7), pp127-137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Rasheed, F. & Wahid, A. (2018). The theory of Differentiated Instruction and its Applicability: An E-learning Perspective. International Journal of Technical & non-Technical Research. IX (IV), 194-202. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Ritzer, G. & Stepnisky, J. (2014). Sociological Theory. 9th Edition. New York: McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Robinson, O.C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative research in psychology, 11 (1), 25-41 Doi: 10.1080/1478 887.2013.801543. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Samkange W. (2015). Analysing the Philosophy of progressivism in relation to contemporary Education practice on Zimbabwe. Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Science, 3 (9B), 1445-1488. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Samkange, W. (2013). Inclusive Education at Primary School: A Case Study of one Primary [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. a. School, Zimbabwe in Glenview/Mufakose Education District in Harare. SIDA i. Disability Rights on Zimbabwe. Available on .http://www.msc.st/Docs%2Outdated%2013/HRBA-Diasbility-Zimbabwe12105pdf 45. Sharma, S. (2017). Using Educational Psychology for Teaching-Learning Environment. International Journal of Education. 8, 21-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Silverman, D. (2014). Interpreting qualitative data. Los Angeles: SAGE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Slavin, R. (2011). Cooperative Learning. In V. G. Aukrust (Ed.), Learning and cognition in a. education. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Statutory Instrument 87 of 1992. Harare: Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Suleyman, C. (2019). Creating an Inclusive and Multicultural Classroom by Differentiated a. Instruction. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Vol 9 (6), 30- b. 40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Tamimy, M. (2015). Consistencies and inconsistencies between teachers’ beliefs and practices. a. he Qualitative Report, 20 (8), 1234-1259. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. The Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) (2013). Harare: a. Government Printers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all a. learners. New York: UNICEF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. 53. United Nations Children’s Education Fund (UNICEF) (2011). The Rights of Children with Disabilities to Education: A Rights-Based Approach to Inclusive Education in the CEECIS Region. Geneva: UNICEF. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. 54. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Cultural communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. C. New a. York: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: McGraw Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. 55. Waitoller, F. R. & Artiles, A.J. (2016). A decade of professional development research for inclusive education: A critical review and notes for a research programme. Review of Educational Research, 83 (3), 319-356. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Westbrook, J., Durrani,. N., Brown, R., Pryor, J., Boddy, J., & Salvi, F. (2015). Pedagogy, a. Curriculum Teaching Practices and Teacher Education in Developing Countries. b. Sussex; University of Sussex. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Yin, R.K. (2014). Case study research: designs and methods. (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage a. Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Yzzan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam and a. Stake. The qualitative report, 20 (2). 134-152. http://networks, nova. Retrieved from b. Stake. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study