Balancing Technology Engagement and Quality Family Moments: Parents' Views

This study aims to explore parents' perspectives on the balance between technology use and quality family time. In the current digital era, the use of technology, such as smartphones and computers, has become an integral part of families' daily routines. However, over-reliance on technology can disrupt social interactions and emotional relationships among family members. This study employs a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews involving five parents selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected both face-to-face and online and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings identify three main themes: challenges in managing technology use within the family, parents' strategies in balancing technology use and family time, and the impact of imbalance on family well-being. Identified challenges include time constraints, work pressure, and screen addiction among children. Parents' strategies include setting screen-free times, engaging in technology-free family activities, and implementing flexible household rules. The effects of technological imbalance include disrupted emotional relationships, impaired children's social development, declining parental executive function, and increased media use among children. This study emphasizes the need for active parental involvement, self-control, and a structured approach in building a balance between technology use and quality family time. Its implications suggest that these findings can serve as a reference for parents, educators, and policymakers in efforts to support family well-being in the digital era.

Family Balance, Technology, Quality Time, Parents, Emotional Relationships

1. Akter, M., Rashid, S. M., & Alam, F. (2022). From parental control to joint family oversight: Can parents and teens manage mobile online safety and privacy as equals? arXiv, 6(1), 1–26. https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.07749 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, P. (2020). Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 26(2), 190–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2018.1556558 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Azman, N. A., Hamzah, M. I., Razak, K. A., & Zulkifli, H. (2024). Digital competence among Islamic teachers: A pilot study on validity and reliability. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4), 51–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bang, T. C. (2024). Ensuring credibility and trustworthiness in qualitative inquiries. In Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design Book Series (pp. 70–85). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-2603-9.ch006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bast, N., Mason, L., Freitag, C. M., Smith, T., Portugal, A. M., Poustka, L., Banaschewski, T., & Johnson, M. (2020). Saccade dysmetria indicates attenuated visual exploration in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13267 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Braune‐Krickau, K., Schneebeli, L., Pehlke‐Milde, J., Gemperle, M., Koch, R., & Von Wyl, A. (2021). Smartphones in the nursery: Parental smartphone use and parental sensitivity and responsiveness within parent–child interaction in early childhood (0–5 years): A scoping review. Infant Mental Health Journal, 42(2), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21908 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Burchinal, M., Foster, T., Garber, K., Cohen-Vogel, L., Bratsch-Hines, M., & Peisner-Feinberg, E. (2022). Examining three hypotheses for pre-kindergarten fade-out. Developmental Psychology, 58(3), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001302 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chong, S. C., Teo, W. Z., & Shorey, S. (2023). Exploring the perception of parents on children’s screentime: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Pediatric Research, 94(3), 915–925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390- 023-02555-9 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Denecker, F., De Decker, E., Eggermont, S., & De Marez, L. (2023). Does parental smartphone use predict parents’ perceptions of family life? Digital Health, 9, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579221134168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Donkoh, S., & Mensah, J. (2023). Application of triangulation in qualitative research. Journal of Applied Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 10(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.15406/jabb.2023.10.00319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Donner, J. (2021). Mobile communication and the family: Exploring parental perspectives in the digital age. Journal of Family Studies, 27(1), 45–61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Enworo, O. C. (2023). Application of Guba and Lincoln’s parallel criteria to assess trustworthiness of qualitative research on indigenous social protection systems. Qualitative Research Journal, 23(4), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-08-2022-0116 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Geurts, S. M., Koning, I. M., Vossen, H., & Van Den Eijnden, R. J. (2021). A qualitative study on children’s digital media use and parents’ self-interest. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 31(7), 2015–2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-02074-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Giunchi, M., Peña-Jimenez, M., & Petrilli, S. (2023). Work-family boundaries in the digital age: A study in France on technological intrusion, work-family conflict, and stress. La Medicina del Lavoro, 114(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v114i4.14510 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hammer, M., Scheiter, K., & Stürmer, K. (2020). New technology, new role of parents: How parents’ beliefs and behavior affect students’ digital media self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 116, 106642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106642 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Khalid-Ahmed, S. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine Surgery and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Konca, A. S. (2021). Digital technology usage of young children: Screen time and families. Early Childhood Education Journal, 50(7), 1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-021-01245-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Konrad, M., Gritton, J., & Blair, B. (2021). Mindful parenting and parent technology use: Examining the intersections and outlining future research directions. Social Sciences, 11(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11020043 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Livingstone, S., & Blum-Ross, A. (2020). Parenting for a digital future. In Oxford University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190874698.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Merkaš, M., et al. (2023). Effects of parents' smartphone use on children's emotions, behavior, and subjective well-being. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 8. https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/15/1/8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Nagata, J. M., Cortez, C. A., Cattle, C. J., Ganson, K. T., Iyer, P., & Vittinghoff, E. (2021). Family screen time and adolescent screen use: A longitudinal study. Academic Pediatrics, 21(3), 470–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2020.09.008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nevin, A. D., & Schieman, S. (2020). Technological tethering, digital natives, and challenges in the work–family interface. Sociological Quarterly, 62(1), 60–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2019.1711264 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pham, T. T., et al. (2023). AI avatars and LLMs in ESL speaking instruction: A critical review. Rupkatha Journal. https://rupkatha.com/v16n409/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rabbani, M., Hosseinian, S., & Zulkharnain, N. H. B. (2022). Screen time and psychological well-being among children: The moderating effect of parenting styles. Journal of Cognitive Sciences and Human Development, 8(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.33736/jcshd.4555.2022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Steffensen, D. S., McAllister, C. P., Perrewé, P. L., Wang, G., & Brooks, C. D. (2021). “You have got mail”: A daily investigation of email demands on job tension and work-family conflict. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(2), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09748-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Suparliadi, S., Wijaya, C., & Daulay, N. (2023). Teacher quality development management in improving the quality of graduates at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 3 Langkat. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 12(1), 681–702. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v12i001.6185 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Vasilaki, M., Zafeiroudi, A., Tsartsapakis, I., Grivas, G. V., Chatzipanteli, A., Aphamis, G., Giannaki, C., & Kouthouris, C. (2025). Learning in nature: A systematic review and meta-analysis of outdoor recreation’s role in youth development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030332 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Wong, R. S., Tung, K. T. S., Rao, N., Leung, C., Hui, A. N. N., Tso, W. W. Y., Fu, K.-W., Jiang, F., Zhao, J., & Ip, P. (2020). Parent technology use, parent–child interaction, child screen time, and child psychosocial problems among disadvantaged families. The Journal of Pediatrics, 226, 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.07.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Zhang, Y., Wang, M., & Li, Y. (2025). Parental technoference and child problematic media use: Meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 27, e57636. https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e57636/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Zurcher, J. D., Jensen, S. A., & Allen, S. (2020). “I can multitask”: The mediating role of media consumption on executive function’s relationship to technoference attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 113, 106498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106498 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study