An Examination of the Impact of Teaching Strategies on Students' Learning Outcome; A Case Study of W.V.S Tubman and G.W. Gibson High Schools in Monrovia (2012-2013)

This thesis provides a comprehensive examination of the impact of teaching strategies on students' learning outcomes, specifically analyzing two MCSS schools: W.V.S Tubman High School and G.W. Gibson High School during the 2012-2013 academic year. Utilizing a descriptive research design, the study employed a systematic sampling technique to gather insightful data from 187 respondents through thoughtfully crafted questionnaires. The findings reveal that discussion, identified by 82 respondents (43.85%), is the most commonly utilized teaching strategy, while lectures were cited by 73 respondents (39.04%) as another principal method implemented in teaching sessions. Direct instruction was recognized by 28 respondents (14.97%) as a significant approach employed during lessons. Additionally, a substantial majority of 129 students (78.18%) and 21 teachers (95.45%) acknowledged that the teaching strategies applied by educators have profoundly influenced students' learning outcomes. Notably, 104 respondents (55.62%) affirmed that they rated the overall performance of both teachers and students as commendable. The recommendations put forth by the researcher are crucial; if diligently applied, they could lead to remarkable enhancements within the Liberian educational system, equipping students for meaningful success beyond secondary school. By prioritizing these recommendations, we can foster a positive and holistic environment that enhances teaching and learning experiences for all.

Education

1. Biggs, J. B. (1987). Research monograph: Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Burns, and Grove, (2003), Understanding Nursing Research 3rd Ed.USA W.B. Saunders company [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cruickshank, et al. 1999. The Act of Teaching, 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Dietel, R. J., Herman, J. L., & Knuth, R. A. (1991). What does research say about assessment? Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL). Retrieved from http://www.ncrel.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Eaton, J. S. (2003, February 28). Before you bash accreditation, consider the alternative. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved Jan. 22, 2013, from http://chronicle.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Entwistle, N. J. (1984). Contrasting perspectives on learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 1-18). Edinburgh, Great Britain: Scottish Academic Press. Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Farewell, M.A and Framer, W.A (1983) Systematic instruction in mathematics for middle and high school years. Addison-Wesley publishing company Inc [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gagne, M. 1985.The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction, 4th edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Harberman, M. (1992) The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. The Education Digest [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hodgson, V. (1984).Learning from lectures. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, &N.Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 90-102). Edinburgh, Great Britain: Scottish Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Hounsell, D. (1984a). Learning and essay-writing. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 103-123). Edinburgh, Great Britain: Scottish Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hounsell, D. (1984b). Understanding teaching and teaching for understanding. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 189-210). Edinburgh, Great Britain: Scottish Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Maclellan, E., &Soden, R. (2007). The significance of knowledge in learning: A psychologically informed analysis of higher educational students’ perceptions [Electronic version]. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1, 1-18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Marton, F., &Säljö, R. (1984).Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 36-55). Edinburgh, Great Britain: Scottish Academic [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Ministry of Education, Republic of Liberia (2004). National Action Plan2004–2015. Retrieved at http://www.unesco. org/Liberia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Ministry of Education, The Liberia Education Master Plan 2000–2010(15). Revised (2005). MOE, Monrovia, Liberia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Onasanya, S.A (1998), Selection and Utilization of instructional strategy in teaching. Journal of Curriculum and teaching, 5(1&2) 53-59 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Ruhland, S. K., & Brewer, J. A. (2001). Implementing an assessment plan to document student learning in a two-year technical college. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 26, 141-171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. UNDP(2006). Mobilizing Capacity for Reconstruction and Development, National Human Development Report for Liberia. Retrieved January 21, 2013, at http://www.lr.undp.org/NHDR’06_web.pdf. UNDP.(2006).Human Development Index Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. UNDP(2006). United Nations Common Country Assessment, Liberia: Consolidating Peace and National Recovery for Sustainable Development. Retrieved January 21, 2013, at: http://www.lr.undp.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. UNESCO(2005). The Education for All Global Monitoring Report: The Quality Imperative. Retrieved January 21, 2013, at http://portal.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. UNESCO. (2004). EFA global monitoring report 2005: The quality imperative. Paris: Author. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. UNESCO. 2008. Overcoming inequality: Why governance matters.EFAGlobal Monitoring Report 2009. Paris: UNESCO; Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved 20 Jan 2013 from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. United Nations. (2009). The millennium development goals report. New York: Author. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Walker, M. H (1998), Three basics for better student’s output The Educational Digest [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
• Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
• “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
• Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
• Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study