The Correlation of Employees' Self-Efficacy Towards Work Performance among Businesses in the Municipality of Impasugong

Authors

Niel Boy I. Guatno

Bachelor of Science in Business Administration Major in Financial Management Bukidnon State University - Impasugong Campus Undergraduate Program Impasugong, Bukidnon (Philippines)

Brexter D. Labado

Bachelor of Science in Business Administration Major in Financial Management Bukidnon State University - Impasugong Campus Undergraduate Program Impasugong, Bukidnon (Philippines)

Bea Joanna Mar Y. Malcino

Bachelor of Science in Business Administration Major in Financial Management Bukidnon State University - Impasugong Campus Undergraduate Program Impasugong, Bukidnon (Philippines)

Rolly Mae Ann D. Bahayan

Bachelor of Science in Business Administration Major in Financial Management Bukidnon State University - Impasugong Campus Undergraduate Program Impasugong, Bukidnon (Philippines)

Jaspher C. Litohon

Bachelor of Science in Business Administration Major in Financial Management Bukidnon State University - Impasugong Campus Undergraduate Program Impasugong, Bukidnon (Philippines)

Richard B. Mercader

Bachelor of Science in Business Administration Major in Financial Management Bukidnon State University - Impasugong Campus Undergraduate Program Impasugong, Bukidnon (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000660

Subject Category: Business

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 8045-8087

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-26

Accepted: 2025-11-04

Published: 2025-11-20

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between self-efficacy and work performance among employees in micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) in the Municipality of Impasugong, Bukidnon. Grounded in Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory (1986), the research focused on four dimensions of self-efficacy performance outcomes, vicarious experiences, verbal persuasion, and physiological feedback and their influence on task performance, contextual performance, and counterproductive behaviors. A descriptive-correlational research design was employed, using a convenience sample of 150 employees. Data were collected through a modified, validated questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Spearman’s rho correlation.
Findings revealed that participants exhibited very high self-efficacy, with the highest mean observed in physiological feedback 3.51, followed by performance outcomes 3.46, vicarious experiences 3.40, and verbal persuasion 3.29. Work performance was also reported as very high, particularly in task performance 3.65 and contextual performance 3.47, while counterproductive behaviors were minimal 3.39, indicating a Very High Level. Correlation analysis indicated a statistically significant positive relationship between overall self-efficacy and work performance, particularly in physiological feedback, performance outcomes, and vicarious experiences. Verbal persuasion, however, showed no significant correlation. Consequently, the null hypothesis was rejected for physiological feedback, performance outcomes, and vicarious experiences, but accepted for verbal persuasion.

Keywords

Task Performance, Contextual Performance

Downloads

References

1. Abun, D., Magallanes, T., & Foronda, M. (2021). Employees’ self-efficacy and work performance as mediated by work environment. International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 9(2), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3958247 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abun, D., Nicolas, M. T., Apollo, E. P., Magallanes, T., & Encarnacion, M. J. (2021). The work environment mediates the relationship between employees' self-efficacy and their work performance. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 10(7), 1–15. https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1470 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alharkan, A. N. M., Wolny-Abouelwafa, E., Althowibi, A., Alhumaid, H. K., Alharbi, A., Alghamdi, H., & Zahra, S. A. (2024). Exploring EFL teachers’ perspectives on the role of social media for building trust in the workplace. World Journal of English Language, 14(6), 405. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n6p405 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alghamdi, F. (2022). The impact of verbal persuasion on self-efficacy and job performance. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 12(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v12i2.20222 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arulsamy, A., Singh, I., Kumar, S., Panchal, J., & Bajaj, K. (2023). Employee training and development enhancing employee performance – A study. Journal, 16, 406–416. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373775939 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Calonia, J. T., Pagente, D. P., Desierto, D. J. C., Capio, R. T., Tembrevilla, J. A. P., Guzmán, C. A., & Nicor, A. J. S. (2023). Time management and academic achievement: Examining the roles of prioritization, procrastination, and socialization. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8115965 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cetin, F., & Askun, D. (2018). The effect of occupational self-efficacy on work performance through intrinsic work motivation. Management Research Review, 41(2), 186–201. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Daly, J., & Thompson, P. (2023). Persuasive self-efficacy: Dispositional and situational correlates. Journal of Workplace Psychology, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2017.1297224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Doménech, P., Tur-Porcar, A. M., & Mestre-Escrivá, V. (2024). Emotion regulation and self-efficacy: The mediating role of emotional stability and extraversion in adolescence. Behavioral Sciences, 14(3), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Elendu, C., Amaechi, D. C., Okatta, A. U., Amaechi, E. C., Elendu, T. C., Ezeh, C. P., & Elendu, I. D. (2024). The impact of simulation-based training in medical education: A review. Medicine, 103(27), e38813. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000038813 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Glette-Iversen, I., Flage, R., & Aven, T. (2023). Extending and improving current frameworks for risk management and decision-making: A new approach for incorporating dynamic aspects of risk and uncertainty. Safety Science, 168, 106317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106317 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Hadi, P. (2023). The influence of self-efficacy on employee performance mediated by work motivation and work engagement. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147–4478), 12(2), 653–661. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v12i2.2465 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hartfield, E., Putnam, K., Desai, A., & Institute, Learnsynergy. (2024). The role of effective communication in student leadership. Journal, 1, 9857–6165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Heng, Y., & Jin, L. K. (2025). Experiential learning and creative self-efficacy in higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR). Retrieved from https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/index [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lee, S. H., Lum, W. C., Boon, J. G., Kristak, L., Antov, P., Pędzik, M., Rogoziński, T., Taghiyari, H. R., Lubis, M. A. R., Fatriasari, W., Yadav, S. M., Chotikhun, A., & Pizzi, A. (2022). Particleboard from agricultural biomass and recycled wood waste: A review. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 20, 4630–4658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.166 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lee, S., Kwon, S., & Ahn, J. (2021). The Effect of Modeling on Self-Efficacy and Flow State in Adolescent Athletes through Role Models. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 661557. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661557 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2022). The effect of vicarious learning on self-efficacy and work engagement. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(3/4), 302–317. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/EJTD-09-2021-0148/full/html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Lifang, Z., & Ali, D. A. (2024). Exploring the impact of performance management systems and feedback quality on employee motivation: Investigating the mediating role of self-efficacy. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(3), e06432. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n3-102 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. López-Garrido, G. (2025). Bandura’s self-efficacy theory of motivation in psychology. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/self-efficacy.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Machmud, S. (2018). The influence of self-efficacy on satisfaction and work-related performance. International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, 4(4), 43–47. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Moreno, M. J. (2022). Social cognitive theory and its application to organizational behavior. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 14(2), 33–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Paramita, D., Darma, D. C., & Arliansyah, A. (2020). Self-efficacy and counterproductive work behavior: A case of Indonesian workers. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 8(4), 275–287. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Qiu, T., Alizadeh, A., Dooley, L. M., & Zhang, R. (2020). Servant leadership and self-efficacy: A mediation model. Journal of Business Ethics, 161(2), 317–329. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Rahman, M. M., Uddin, M. S., & Islam, M. S. (2021). Workplace wellness, physiological feedback, and self-efficacy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4753. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/9/4753 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Raman, R., & Rubasree, R. (2023). Self-efficacy: Implications for motivation, job satisfaction, and performance in the workplace. Human Resource Development Review, 21(4), 112–130. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sarmiento, L. F., Da Cunha, P. L., Tabares, S., Tafet, G., & Gouveia, A., Jr. (2024). Decision-making under stress: A psychological and neurobiological integrative model. Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health, 38, 100766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Siagian, E. I., Nurkarim, M. C., & Maharani, N. (2024). Persuasive communication in business negotiations: Strategies and techniques. Ilomata International Journal of Social Science, 5(2), 428–443. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijss.v5i2.1165 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Soegiarto, I., Arifah, N. J. A., Rahmadhani, M. V., & Ilham, I. (2024). Effects of leadership development programs, mentorship, and employee empowerment on organizational performance. International Journal of Business Law and Education, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.56442/ijble.v5i2.755 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Supervisor, & Majini, J., & Bella, K. M. (2023). Determinants of the impact of time management on work-life balance. Journal, 11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Tatar, A. (2020). Impact of job satisfaction on organizational commitment. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339401568 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Vitale, V., & Bonaiuto, M. (2024). The role of nature in emotion regulation processes: An evidence-based rapid review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 96, 102325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102325 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Wardhana, A., & Harsono, M. (2024). Self-efficacy and work performance: Empirical evidence from Indonesian SMEs. Heliyon, 10(2), e15123. https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(24)01512-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Worthen, M. (2023). Stress management. NCBI Bookshelf. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513300/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Zhenjing, G., Chupradit, S., Ku, K. Y., Nassani, A. A., & Haffar, M. (2022). Impact of employees’ workplace environment on employees’ performance: A multi-mediation model. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 890400. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.890400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Zhang, Y., Wang, M., & Zhang, X. (2023). Self-efficacy and employee adaptability: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3025. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Zirar, A., Ali, S. I., & Islam, N. (2023). Worker and Workplace Artificial Intelligence (AI) Coexistence: Emerging Themes and Research Agenda. Technovation, 124, 102747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102747 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles