Xenophobia and Nigeria-South Africa Diplomatic Relations: A Critical Analysis of Measures to Strengthen Diplomatic Ties, 2008-2024.

Xenophobic attacks on Nigerians in South Africa have posed significant challenges to diplomatic relations between the two countries. Despite these challenges, both governments have implemented measures to strengthen bilateral ties. This paper provides a critical analysis of these measures, exploring their effectiveness in promoting diplomatic relations and limitations and challenges faced by these measures in consolidating, strengthening and promoting the diplomatic ties between Nigeria and South Africa in the face of xenophobia. The frustration – aggression and constructivism postulations were used as frameworks of analysis. However, the constructivism postulation was adopted in the study. Methodologically however, descriptive research design was used as a tool of analysis. Purposive sampling method was adopted in order to solicit necessary information from respondents who are knowledgeable or familiar with the topical issue under discourse. However, findings reveal dialogue and mutual understanding were the measures implemented to strengthen diplomatic ties between Nigeria and South Africa in the face of xenophobic attacks. The study also discovered, high level diplomatic engagements, citizen diplomacy, cultural exchange, economic cooperation and conflict resolution mechanisms were employed in addressing xenophobic attacks and improve diplomatic relations between Nigeria and South Africa during of xenophobic attacks. Lack of trust, inadequate communication and domestic politics were viewed by the study as the challenges and limitations of the measures used to strengthen diplomatic relationship between Nigeria and South Africa in the face of xenophobic attacks. Based on the findings, the research recommended that, the Nigeria and South Africa governments should implement citizen diplomacy initiatives, such as cultural exchange programs (adopting a cultural mix policy), educational programs, and business initiatives to encourage people-to-people relations, which will help build understanding, eliminate xenophobic violence and reduce stereotypes between the two countries.

Xenophobia, Diplomacy, Relations, Violence

1. Aaron, R (1962) Peace and War: A theory of International Relations, 1st edition, England, Routlede. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adebisi, A. P. (2017). Xenophobia: Healing a festering sore in Nigerian-South African relations. Journal of International Relations and Foreign Policy, 5(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Adewale (2010) South Africa – Nigeria diplomatic and economic relations, 1994 t0 2004, “Africa review: journal of Africa Studies association of India, vol 2(1).” [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Babalola, (2017) xenophobia attacks of Nigerian in south African: vanguard New retrieved March 5th 2022 from http://www.Vanguardngr.com/7/03/xenophbia-attacks-nigerians-south-africa/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bernard, W and Kite, M (2009) the psychology of prejudice and discrimination, 2nd edition, Wadsworth, Belmont C.A. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bromnline, L (1979) Principles of Public International Law, Clarendon press, oxford. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cohen (1955) Social Norms, Arbitrariness of Frustration and Status of the Frustration- Aggression Hypothesis, Journal of abnormal and social psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Crush J and Ramachandrans (2014) xenophobic violence in South Africa: denialism, minimalism, realism, Bronwen dach mother, Cape Town [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dolf, Z (1979) Hostility and Aggression, hills dale, N.J Lawrence Erlbaum associates. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Dollard e’tal (1939) frustration and aggression new heaven: Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Educational Wave. (n.d.). Pros and cons of constructivism in international relations.#Key_Takeaways. Retrieved from https://www.educationalwave.com/pros-and-cons-of-constructivism-in-internationalrelations/#Key_Takeaways [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Finnemore, M and Sikkink, (2001). "Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics". Annual Review of Political Science. 4 (1): 391– 416. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.391. S2CID 3640392 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Harris, B (2022) xenophobia: A new pathology for a new south Africa? In hook. Thoughtco. Retrieved from http://www.thought.co.com%2relative-deprivation.theory on 6th February, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. http://mariamwebster.com (accessed July 9th 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/kwerekwere#english,2019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. http://www.worldometersinfor-worldpopulation, (accessed March 2025) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Licata, L., & Klein, O. (2002). Does European citizenship breed xenophobia? European identification as a predictor of intolerance towards immigrants. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mclean, D (1996) War, Diplomacy and Informal Empire: Britain and the Republic of La Plata, 1836 – 1853, London, British academic press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nicolson, H (1963) Diplomacy, 3rd edition, London, Oxford university press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ogunnoiki, O and Adeyemi, A (2019) the impact of xenophobic attacks on Nigeria – South Africa Relations. “African Journal of social science and humanities research, vol. 2(2)” [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ogunnoki, A (2019) xenophobic violence in South Africa and the reaction in Nigeria in the journal of politics and international affair, vol 7 and 2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ogunnubi, O., & Aja, U. A. (2022). Citizen Diplomacy in Nigeria-South Africa Relation: Confronting the Paradox of Xenophobia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 9(3), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/1018 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ogunnubi O and Amusan L (2019) “Nigeria’s attitude towards South Africa’s perceived xenophobia: Exploring a shared hegemonic Power for Africa’s development” cited in Adedoyin A and Okengwu K (2021), South Africa xenophobic attacks on Nigerians: A threat to Nigeria-South Africa foreign policy/relation benefits in post- apartheid era, “Christopher university journal of management and social science (CUJMSS)” [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Olutuche, O and Okolie, S (2021). Examining the triggers of xenophobic attacks in republic of South Africa. “Journal of political science and leadership research, vol.7, No. 22021.” [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Passnownow (2018) as cited in Eleonu, C and Ebikebina, S (2019) Challenges of Foreign Policy in Modern Diplomacy: “The Nigerian Example International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS) |Volume III, Issue X, October 2019|ISSN 2454-6186”. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Pastore, N (1952) The Role of Arbitrariness in the Frustration – Aggression Hypothesis: Journal of abnormal and social psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Peil, M. (1974). Ghana’s aliens. International Migration Review, 8(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Reynolds, V. & Vine, I. (1987). The socio-biology of ethnocentrism: Evolutionary dimensions of xenophobia, discrimination, racism, and nationalism. London: Croom Helm. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sam, N (2013) psychology dictionary.org http://psychologydictionary.org/rlations/ (accessed July 9th 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Schneider V (2019) Nigeria, South Africa to set up early warning system over attacks retrieved from https://www.goggle.com/url? Sa = https://%2f%2 2- Nigeria – leader – south – Africa – weeks – foreigner – on 18th march, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Schneider, V (2019) Nigeria, South Africa to set up early warning system over attacks, retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=https%3A%2F%2-nigerian-leader-south-africa-weeks-attacks-foreigneron 18th March, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Seteolu B & Okuneye J (2017) the struggle for hegemony in Africa: Nigeria and South Africa relations in perspectives, 1999 – 2014. African journal of political science and international relations. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Smelser, J and Baltes, P (2001), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Soltan, H (1963) an introduction to politics, Longman, London. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Satow (1979) Guide to diplomatic practice, 5th edition, London, Longman. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Watson, A (1984) Diplomacy: The dialogue between states, England, Routlede. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Watts, M.W. (1996). Political xenophobia in the transition from socialism: Threat, racism and ideology among East German youth. Political Psychology, 17. www.dictionary.com, (accessed July 9th 2023) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Yakushko, O. (2009). Xenophobia: Understanding the roots and consequences of negative attitudes toward immigrants, Educational psychology papers and publications, paper 90. Available online at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/edpsychpapers/90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar