The Last Warning: Predictive Surveillance or Community Protection? AI Early Warning Systems and Environmental Justice After Flint

Authors

Dr. Mario Desean Booker

School of Business and Information Technology, Purdue University Global (USA)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000674

Subject Category: Environment

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 8243-8268

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-29

Accepted: 2025-11-04

Published: 2025-11-20

Abstract

When Flint switched its water source in April 2014, residents immediately complained about foul smelling, discolored water. Officials dismissed these concerns for eighteen months while over 100,000 people consumed lead-contaminated drinking water. Could AI early warning systems have prevented this disaster?
This question matters because cities across America face similar infrastructure crises. Using sociological analysis combined with technical assessment, I examine whether predictive surveillance technologies could have detected Flint's water contamination before it poisoned an entire community.
The technical capabilities exist. Sensor networks can monitor water quality continuously. Machine learning algorithms excel at pattern recognition. Health surveillance systems can identify disease clusters within days rather than months. But here's the problem: Flint's crisis wasn't caused by lack of information.
Emergency managers ignored mounting evidence because austerity politics prioritized cost savings over public health. Community complaints were dismissed as "anecdotal." Regulatory agencies operated under corporate influence. Environmental racism shaped which populations were deemed expendable.
My analysis reveals that technical solutions alone cannot address structural inequalities. AI systems risk reproducing the same power dynamics that created the crisis. Without community control and democratic governance, algorithmic early warning systems become sophisticated tools for maintaining existing hierarchies rather than protecting vulnerable populations.
The implications extend far beyond Flint to questions of environmental justice and technological
governance in an era of increasing surveillance.

Keywords

Environment

Downloads

References

1. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016). Machine bias. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim Crow. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bullard, R. D. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality. Westview Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Clark, L. P., Millet, D. B., & Marshall, J. D. (2017). National patterns in environmental injustice and inequality: Outdoor NO2 air pollution in the United States. PLOS ONE, 12(4), e0177629. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Corburn, J. (2005). Street science: Community knowledge and environmental health justice. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hanna-Attisha, M., LaChance, J., Sadler, R. C., & Champney Schnepp, A. (2016). Elevated blood lead levels in children associated with the Flint drinking water crisis: A spatial analysis of risk and public health response. American Journal of Public Health, 106(2), 283-290. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.303003 Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Lanphear, B. P., Hornung, R., Khoury, J., Yolton, K., Baghurst, P., Bellinger, D. C., Canfield, R. L., Dietrich, K. N., Bornschein, R., Greene, T., Rothenberg, S. J., Needleman, H. L., Schnaas, L., Wasserman, G., Graziano, J., & Roberts, R. (2005). Low-level environmental lead exposure and children's intellectual function: An international pooled analysis. Environmental Health Perspectives, 113(7), 894-899. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Masten, S. J., Davies, S. H., & McElmurry, S. P. (2016). Flint water crisis: What happened and why? Journal AWWA, 108(12), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.5942/jawwa.2016.108.0195 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Olson, A., Boehmke, B., Lacombe, V., Schwing, C., & Seeger, B. (2017). Machine learning approach for real-time lead exposure risk assessment in drinking water. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(14), 7835-7843. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b01497 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Pauli, B. J. (2019). Flint fights back: Environmental justice and democracy in the Flint water crisis. MIT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Potash, E., Ghani, R., Walsh, J., Jorgensen, E., Lohmann, C., Prachand, N., & Mansour, R. (2015). Predictive modeling for public health: Preventing childhood lead poisoning. Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2039-2047. https://doi.org/10.1145/2783258.2788629 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Proctor, R. N., & Schiebinger, L. (Eds.). (2008). Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Sattar, A. M., Ertuğrul, Ö. F., Gharabaghi, B., McBean, E. A., & Cao, J. (2016). Prediction of timing of watermain failure using gene expression models. Water Research, 90, 434-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.12.040 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Tilly, C. (1998). Durable inequality. University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). American Community Survey 5-year estimates. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/ . [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zahran, S., McElmurry, S. P., Kilgore, P. E., Mushinski, D., Press, J., Love, N. G., Sadler, R. C., & Swanson, M. S. (2018). Assessment of the Legionnaires' disease outbreak in Flint, Michigan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(8), E1730-E1739. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718679115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles