The Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Teaching the Malay Language to Students with Hearing Impairments in Malaysia

Authors

Abdul Rahim Razalli.

Faculty of Human Development, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Nadzimah Idris

Faculty of Human Development, Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0681

Subject Category: Education

Volume/Issue: 9/26 | Page No: 8977-8991

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-20

Accepted: 2025-10-28

Published: 2025-11-21

Abstract

This study investigates the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in enhancing Malay language learning among students with hearing impairments, focusing on how AI facilitates the transition from Malaysian Sign Language (Bahasa Isyarat Malaysia, BIM) to grammatically correct written Malay. A qualitative case study design was employed involving seven students with severe hearing loss (above 120 decibels) from three secondary schools under the Special Education Integration Programme in Perak, Malaysia. All participants used BIM as their primary mode of communication and were learning Malay as a second language. Two special education teachers also contributed perspectives to triangulate the findings. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis of students’ written work before and after AI integration. The analysis followed Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic framework, ensuring rigor through peer review by qualitative research experts. Findings revealed that AI served as a linguistic bridge between sign language and written Malay, provided scaffolding for sentence restructuring, and enhanced self-correction, motivation, and writing autonomy. Students demonstrated significant improvements in grammatical accuracy, morphological awareness, vocabulary, and the use of affixes, conjunctions, and discourse markers, which were reflected in improved performance in school-based and semester assessments. Overall, the study highlights that AI integration can transform Malay language instruction for deaf learners by bridging linguistic gaps and promoting equitable literacy development. The findings underscore the need for the Ministry of Education to support the adoption of AI-assisted pedagogical innovations to enhance inclusive Malay language education and expand academic and professional opportunities for students with hearing impairments.

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Malay Language, Hearing Impairment, Special Education

Downloads

References

1. Abatbaevna, E. S. (2025). The role of language in shaping cultural identity. Eurasian Journal of Academic Research, 5(3), 61–64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmed, F. (2024). The digital divide and AI in education: Addressing equity and accessibility. AI EDIFY Journal, 1(2), 12–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ali, Y. A., Ali, M. M., AlQurashi, I. S., Imran, M., & Ubaid, U. U. (2025). The Application of Game-Based Learning in Saudi English Language Classrooms. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.387647 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alijoyo, F. A., Mohammad, R., Alazzam, M. B., Kavitha, P., Giftsy Dorcas, E., & Bala, B. K. (2025). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Writing Assessment: Learner Perceptions and System Effectiveness. 2nd International Conference on IT Innovations and Knowledge Discovery, ITIKD 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITIKD63574.2025.11005369 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Aljanada, R. A., Alfaisal, A. M., AlHamad, A. Q. M., Himdi, H., Alfaisal, R., & Salloum, S. A. (2025). Cultural Implications in Generative AI Using Text Clustering and Sentiment Analysis. In Studies in Computational Intelligence (Vol. 1208, pp. 171–185). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89175-5_11 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Alkahtani, B. N. (2024). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Quality of Life for Deaf and Hard of Hearing Students. American Annals of the Deaf, 169(4), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2024.a946587 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Allen, T. E., Letteri, A., Choi, S. H., & Dang, D. (2014). Early visual language exposure and emergent literacy in preschool deaf children: Findings from a national longitudinal study. American Annals of the Deaf, 159(4), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2014.0030 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Alothman, A. A. (2021). Language and literacy of deaf children. Psychology and Education, 58(1), 799–819. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Anwer, F. (2019). Activity-based teaching, student motivation and academic achievement. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(1), 154–170. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Asri, M., Ahmad, Z., Mohtar, I. A., & Ibrahim, S. (2019). A real time Malaysian sign language detection algorithm based on YOLOv3. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2), 651–656. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Asrifan, A., Wajdi, F., Ishak, S., & Alwi, A. (2025). Humanizing the digital classroom: The educator’s role in fostering connection amidst technology. In Blending Human Intelligence With Technology in the Classroom (pp. 87–118). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0771-8.ch005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Barrios-Beltran, D. (2025). Exploring the efficacy of ChatGPT-4 feedback in second language Spanish writing. System, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103771 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Berrezueta-Guzman, S., Daya, R., & Wagner, S. (2025). Virtual reality in sign language education: opportunities, challenges, and the road ahead. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 6, 1625910. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Bragg, D., Caselli, N., Hochgesang, J. A., Huenerfauth, M., Katz-Hernandez, L., Koller, O., Kushalnagar, R., Vogler, C., & Ladner, R. E. (2021). The FATE Landscape of Sign Language AI Datasets: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3436996 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Chong , A. A. V. Y., & Mohd Hussain, R. B. M. H. (2021). Language barriers in deaf-centred classroom: perspectives from Malaysian deaf adults. Journal of Special Needs Education, 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chong, V. Y. (2014). Attitudes of Deaf Malaysians Toward Malaysian Sign Language Within Deaf Education (1954-2000). Gallaudet University. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Chong, V. Y. (2018). Development of Malaysian Sign Language in Malaysia. Journal of Special Needs Education, 8, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Colston, H. L. (2019). How language makes meaning: Embodiment and conjoined antonymy. In How Language Makes Meaning: Embodiment and Conjoined Antonymy. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108377546 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Curriculum Development Division. (2017). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah (KSSM) Kerangka Kurikulum Mata Pelajaran (Vol. 1). Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia Hak. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. De Sisto, M., Vandeghinste, V., Gómez, S. E., De Coster, M., Shterionov, D., & Saggion, H. (2022). Challenges with Sign Language Datasets for Sign Language Recognition and Translation. 2022 Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, LREC 2022, 2478–2487. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85144408125&partnerID=40&md5=a0c2622feea2faf9b57c6b39658d07ba [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Dostal, H. M., & Wolbers, K. A. (2014). Developing language and writing skills of deaf and hard of hearing students: A simultaneous approach. Literacy Research and Instruction, 53(3), 245–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Fathi, J., Rahimi, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2024). Improving EFL learners’ speaking skills and willingness to communicate via artificial intelligence-mediated interactions. System, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103254 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Fitas, R. (2025). Inclusive Education with AI: Supporting Special Needs and Tackling Language Barriers. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2504.14120. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Gärdenfors, M. (2023). Writing Development in DHH Students: A Bimodal Bilingual Approach. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 28(2), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enac045 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Gärdenfors, M., Johansson, V., & Schönström, K. (2019). Spelling in deaf, hard of hearing and hearing children with sign language knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2463. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Gómez Cano, C. A., & Colala Troya, A. L. (2023). Artificial Intelligence applied to teaching and learning processes. LatIA, 1. https://doi.org/10.62486/latia20232 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Gorter, D., Cenoz, J., & der Worp, K. van. (2021). The linguistic landscape as a resource for language learning and raising language awareness. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 8(2), 161–181. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Grash, N., Skuratovskaya, M., & Mamedova, E. (2021). Speech education of students with hearing impairment as a means of communication. E3S Web of Conferences, 273. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127312091 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Helmiati, M., Sudarsono, S., & Susilowati, E. (2019). The correlation of grammar mastery with writing ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 8(9). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Kamarudin, D., Kamarudin, D., & Hussain, Y. (2021). Hearing impaired student achievement on the bahasa melayu subject: are these tests applicable? Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 12(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Kolhatin, A. O. (2025). From automation to augmentation: a human-centered framework for generative AI in adaptive educational content creation. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 4060, 143–195. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105019297347&partnerID=40&md5=9984d27b9df38e2e4b15021498d4e68c [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Kumar, A., Nayyar, A., Sachan, R. K., & Jain, R. (2023). AI-assisted special education for students with exceptional needs. IGI Global. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Lai, Z. C.-C. (2025). The Impact of AI-Assisted Blended Learning on Writing Efficacy and Resilience. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCALLT.377174 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Lee, W. Y., Tan, J. T. A., & Kok, J. K. (2022). The struggle to fit in: A qualitative study on the sense of belonging and well-being of deaf people in Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia. Psychological Studies, 67(3), 385–400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Leong, W. Y. (2025). Personalized AI Solutions for Supporting Communication Needs of Disabled Students. 2025 14th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology, ICEIT 2025, 525–529. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEIT64364.2025.10976060 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Mateus-Gómez, S., Niño-Rincón, N., & Navarro-Roldán, C. P. (2024). Socioemotional development in children and adolescents with hearing impairment: A systematic review. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 56, 199–213. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2024.v56.20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Mazari, N. (2025). Building metacognitive skills using AI tools to help higher education students reflect on their learning process. RHS: Revista Humanismo y Sociedad, 13(1), 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Mohamed, A. M., Shaaban, T. S., Bakry, S. H., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., & Strzelecki, A. (2025). Empowering the Faculty of Education Students: Applying AI’s Potential for Motivating and Enhancing Learning. Innovative Higher Education, 50(2), 587–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-024-09747-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Moustafa, A., Al Rashaida, M., Al Yaqoubi, A. R. S., & Mustafa, N. (2025). AI-Powered Interventions Revolutionizing Support for Students With Sensory Impairments: Challenges, AI Solutions, AI, and Accessibility. In AI in Learning, Educational Leadership, and Special Education: Innovations and Ethical Dilemmas (pp. 221–245). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0573-8.ch008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Muhammed Farsin, K., Mohammed Ashfaque, P. K., Mohamed Abdul Shahid, P. G., Mohammad Mirdas, C. K., Anish Kumar, B., & Jemsheer Ahmed, P. (2025). Sign Language Transformation: AI-Enabled Communication for the Deaf. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 1164 LNNS, 787–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8329-8_57 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Navinkumar, A., & Sivakami, B. (2024). Learning by Gaming: Investigating the Effectiveness of Kahoot! on Young ESL Learners‟ Language Performance. World Journal of English Language, 14(3), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n3p148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Nur Syafiza Shafee, Muhammad Zuhair Zainal, & Md Baharuddin Abdul Rahman. (2022). Code Mixing in Writing by Pupils with Hearing Impairment. International Journal of Creative Future and Heritage (TENIAT), 10(1 SE-Articles). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47252/teniat.v10i1.829 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Papastratis, I., Chatzikonstantinou, C., Konstantinidis, D., Dimitropoulos, K., & Daras, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Technologies for Sign Language. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175843 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Parveen, K., Obidallah, W. J., Alghamdi, A. A., Alduraywish, Y. A., & Shafiq, M. (2025). Gesture-enhanced adaptive learning platform for personalized AI-driven education. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Parwani, D., & Devnani, M. (2024). The impact of artificial intelligence on teacher-learner interaction in virtual education: Addressing challenges and embracing opportunities. In AI Algorithms and ChatGPT for Student Engagement in Online Learning (pp. 218–241). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-4268-8.ch015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Pastushenkov, D., Pavlenko, O., & Clancy, S. (2025). Re-envisioning vocabulary learning and testing in L2 Russian classes using Kahoot!: From choosing words to playing games. Language Learning and Technology, 29(2), 35–43. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85216945735&partnerID=40&md5=8a50d7e0b3a4bab7e580ba86add8cf85 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Qassrawi, R., & Karasneh, S. Al. (2025). Redefinition of human-centric skills in language education in the AI-driven era. Studies in English Language and Education. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.43082 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Rahim, S. Z. A., & Ayob, L. (2024). Unsur intersemiotik dalam interpretasi bahasa isyarat: Intersemiotic elements in sign language interpretation. ATTARBAWIY: Malaysian Online Journal of Education, 8(2), 83–90. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Ramakrishnan, R., Salleh, N. M., & Alias, A. (2020). Impact of Language Learning Software on Hearing-Impaired Students’ Language Skills. Akademika, 90, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Razalli, A. R., Anal, A., Mamat, N., & Hashim, T. (2018). Effects of bilingual approach in Malay language teaching for hearing impaired students. Int. J. Acad. Res. Progress. Educ. Dev, 7, 109–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Ringor, R. G. M., Tuason, C. M. P., Ibarra, J. B. G., & Sejera, M. M. (2024). Integration of ASL and FSL Recognition with YOLOv7. Proceedings - ELTICOM 2024: 8th International Conference on Electrical, Telecommunication and Computer Engineering: Tech-Driven Innovations for Global Organizational Resilience, 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1109/ELTICOM64085.2024.10865001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Saborío-Taylor, S., & Rojas-Ramírez, F. (2024). Universal design for learning and artificial intelligence in the digital era: Fostering inclusion and autonomous learning. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 6(2), ep2408. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Saddhono, K., Suhita, R., Istanti, W., Kusmiatun, A., Kusumaningsih, D., & Sukmono, I. K. (2024). AI-Powered Language Learning: Enhancing Literacy in the Digital Age. 2024 4th International Conference on Advancement in Electronics and Communication Engineering, AECE 2024, 856–861. https://doi.org/10.1109/AECE62803.2024.10911149 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Sarkar, R., Pugazh, A., Lavanya, K., & Harish, D. (2025). Unlocking educational access: A study on AI-driven communication technologies for students with hearing impairments. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3327(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0289508 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Shashwat, K., & Pundhir, S. K. S. (2025). Artificial intelligence in education: Personalizing learning and overcoming ethical challenges. In Immersive Learning in Teacher Education: Simulated Environments, Tools, and Practices (pp. 137–176). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9861-6.ch005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Sincan, O. M., Camgoz, N. C., & Bowden, R. (2023). Is context all you need? Scaling Neural Sign Language Translation to Large Domains of Discourse. Proceedings - 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, ICCVW 2023, 1947–1957. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVW60793.2023.00210 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Sindhu, K. S., Nikitha, B., Varma, P. L., & Uddagiri, C. (2024). Sign Language Recognition and Translation Systems for Enhanced Communication for the Hearing Impaired. 2024 1st International Conference on Cognitive, Green and Ubiquitous Computing, IC-CGU 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC-CGU58078.2024.10530832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. So, C. F., & Lo, W. K. (2025). Enhancing Educational Inclusivity through Interactive AI for Sign Language Interpretation. Proceedings - 2025 IEEE 49th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference, COMPSAC 2025, 1532–1533. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC65507.2025.00198 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Stake, R. (1995). Case study research. Cham: Springer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Tao, Y., Viberg, O., Baker, R. S., & Kizilcec, R. F. (2024). Cultural bias and cultural alignment of large language models. PNAS Nexus, 3(9). https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae346 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Torrisi-Steele, G. (2025). AI and the Ethics of Student Data Privacy. In Foundations and Frameworks for AI in Education (pp. 53–76). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-2397-8.ch003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Trussell, J. W., & Easterbrooks, S. R. (2017). Morphological Knowledge and Students Who Are Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing: A Review of the Literature. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 38(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740116644889 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. UNESCO. (2023). Digital Technologies for Disability Inclusion: All Learners on Equal Terms – Webinar by UNESCO IITE & UNESCO IICBA. https://iite.unesco.org/news/digital-technologies-for-disability-inclusion-all-learners-on-equal-terms/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society (M. Cole, V. Jolm-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (eds.)). Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Wei, L. (2018). Translanguaging as a Practical Theory of Language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. Yang, Y. (2025). AI-supported L2 vocabulary acquisition–a systematic review from 2015 to 2023. Education and Information Technologies, 30(13), 17995–18029. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13417-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Yaqin, L. N., Hassan, H., & Yusof, B. (2025). Performance and accuracy of ChatGPT in generating Malay academic texts: A comparative study with expert corrections. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 28(1), 495–517. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Zhang, H., Wang, Z., Zong, S., Wu, H., Jiang, R., Cui, Y., Li, S., & Luo, H. (2024). Impact of intelligent learning environments on perception and presence of hearing-impaired college students: Findings of design-based research. Educational Technology and Society, 27(4), 352–374. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202410_27(4).SP09 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles