Impact of Biomass Burning and Anthropogenic Emissions on Africa’s Solar Radiation Budget: Causes, Implications, and Mitigation Strategies

Authors

Emmanuel Wennie

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control / Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, (China)

Liu Zhenxin

Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control / Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (NUIST), Nanjing 210044, (China)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000753

Subject Category: Environment

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 9226-9239

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-10-31

Accepted: 2025-11-05

Published: 2025-11-23

Abstract

Africa significantly contributes to global carbonaceous aerosol emissions, driven predominantly by biomass burning (70% in sub-Saharan Africa) and rising anthropogenic activities. These emissions disrupt atmospheric energy balances, reduce surface solar radiation, and intensify regional climate variability. This study synthesizes observational data to quantify impacts on the solar radiation budget, identify emission drivers, and propose mitigation strategies. Results show that aerosol-driven radiative forcing decreases surface solar radiation by approximately 15–25% in emission hotspots during dry seasons. Key drivers include seasonal biomass burning, urban pollution, and unsustainable agriculture. Proposed mitigation pathways include transitioning to clean energy, adopting non-burn farming practices, enforcing air quality regulations, and enhancing integrated monitoring systems. These strategies are critical to strengthening Africa’s climate resilience and maintaining the global energy balance.

Keywords

Biomass burning, Anthropogenic emissions, Aerosol Optical Depth

Downloads

References

1. Andreae, H. M., He, J., & Wooster, M. J. (2023). Biomass burning CO, PM and fuel consumption per unit burned area estimates derived across Africa using geostationary SEVIRI fire radiative power and Sentinel 5P CO data. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 23, 2089–2118. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp 23 2089 2023 AGU Publications+3ACP+3ACP+3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Mallet, M., Voldoire, A., Solmon, F., Nabat, P., Drugé, T., & Roehrig, R. (2024). Impact of biomass burning aerosols (BBA) on the tropical African climate in an ocean–atmosphere–aerosol coupled climate model. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 24, 12509–12535. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp 24 12509 2024 ACP [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Elsey, J., Bellouin, N., & Ryder, C. (2024). Sensitivity of global direct aerosol shortwave radiative forcing to uncertainties in aerosol optical properties. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 24, 4065–4081. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp 24 4065 2024 ACP [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Akinyoola, J. A., Oluleye, A., & Gbode, I. E. (2024). A review of atmospheric aerosol impacts on regional extreme weather and climate events. Aerosol Science and Engineering, 8, 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41810 024 00223 x SpringerLink+1espo.nasa.gov+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Nguyen, H. M., He, J., & Wooster, M. J. (2023). Biomass burning CO, PM and fuel consumption per unit burned area estimates derived across Africa. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 23, 2089–2118. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp 23 2089 2023 (See Andreae et al.) airbornescience.nasa.gov+3ACP+3ACP+3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Opio, R., Mugume, I., Nakatumba Nabende, J., Nanteza, J., Nimusiima, A., & Mbogga, M., & Mugagga, F. (2022). Evaluation of WRF Chem simulations of NO₂ and CO from biomass burning over East Africa and its surrounding regions. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 33, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44195 022 00029 9 SpringerLink [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Sakaeda, N., Vogelmann, A. M., Wang, H., et al. (2024). Estimation and model performance of aerosol radiative forcing over Skukuza (South Africa) during 1999–2010 using sun photometer data. Journal of Atmospheric Sciences (accepted). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.01.005 ScienceDirect+1ScienceDirect+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Stenchikov, G. L. (2024). Saharan dust impacts on regional radiative budgets and circulation: implications for aerosol–climate interaction. Climate Dynamics (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382 024 07089 x Wikipedia [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kazadzis, S., Kouremeti, N., Gröbner, J., Masoom, A., & Karanikolas, A. (2024). Aerosol Optical Depth measurements at the WMO Global GAW PFR network: long term trends and calibration. Poster presented at WMO/AERONET Workshop, Davos, Switzerland. [unpublished poster]. aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bouabid, S., Watson Parris, D., Stefanović, S., Nenes, A., & Sejdinovic, D. (2022). AODisaggregation: toward global aerosol vertical profiles. arXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.04296 arXiv [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Juma, S. G., & Mbithi, D. N. (2024). Estimation of radiative forcing due to black carbon on snow over mountains of Eastern African region. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 8(1), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.305/irej.2024.08.01.1706060 irejournals.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Elsey, J., Bellouin, N., & Ryder, C. (2024). Sensitivity of global direct aerosol shortwave radiative forcing to uncertainties in aerosol optical properties. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 24, 4065–4081. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp 24 4065 2024 ACP [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mitchell, D. L., Shindell, D., & Akinyoola, J. A. (2024). Effective Radiative Forcing in the aerosol climate model CAM5.3 MARC ARG. arXiv Preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.06158 ScienceDirect+15arXiv+15SpringerLink+15 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. A review of measurement-based assessments of the aerosol direct radiative effect and forcing. (2024). NASA Atmospheric Composition Modeling and Analysis Program Report. [Unpublished technical report]. ACP+2espo.nasa.gov+2airbornescience.nasa.gov+2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles