Innovative Approaches to Indigenizing Mathematics Education: Methods and Practices from Southern Province, Zambia

This research investigates the application of new methods of indigenizing mathematics education in Southern Province of Zambia, specifically the integration of indigenous knowledge systems in mathematics teaching. The research design is a sequential exploratory mixed methods design, where quantitative data was collected from 55 mathematics and teachers using structured questionnaires while qualitative data was collected from 15 teachers through semi structured interviews and focus group discussions. The results show that the use of examples and contexts from the local environment, traditional games, stories, local languages and problem-solving contexts increase the learning of mathematics. The quantitative analysis shows that the use of examples and contexts was rated as the most effective (Mean=4.10), followed by traditional games (Mean=3.90) and contextual problem-solving activities (Mean=3.80). ANOVA and post hoc Tukey HSD tests were conducted to determine the statistical significance of the differences in effectiveness among these approaches and the results supported the effectiveness of culturally sensitive pedagogical approaches. The qualitative data also supported these findings and showed that cultural relevance can improve students' interest and understanding of the content. The study has significant practical, theoretical and policy implications and the recommendations made will be useful to educators and policymakers in designing an effective and context specific mathematics education system in Zambia. This paper therefore emphasizes the need to consider the needs of professional development, curriculum, and resources to support the integration of indigenous knowledge in education sustainably.

Indigenizing education, mathematics education

1. Ardiansyah, M. (2023). Mathematic disposition of students on the application of ethnomathematics interactive mathematics learning. Jumlahku Jurnal Matematika Ilmiah Stkip Muhammadiyah Kuningan, 9(2), 117-127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Barnes, E., Jamie, I., Vemulpad, S., Elders, C., Breckenridge, D., Froud, A., & Jamie, J. (2021). National Indigenous Science Education Program (NISEP): Outreach strategies that facilitate inclusion. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(1), 245-251. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Barnhardt, R., & Kawagley, A. O. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska native ways of knowing. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 36(1), 8-23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Battiste, M. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and pedagogy in First Nations education: A literature review with recommendations. National Working Group on Education and the Minister of Indian Affairs Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematics education in its cultural context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(2), 179-191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brayboy, B. M. J., & Castagno, A. E. (2009). Self‐determination through self‐education: Culturally responsive schooling for indigenous students in the USA. Teaching Education, 20(1), 31-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Brown, J. (2017). A metasynthesis of the complementarity of culturally responsive and inquiry‐based science education in k‐12 settings: Implications for advancing equitable science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(9), 1143-1173. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Craven, R., Yeung, A., & Han, F. (2014). The impact of professional development and indigenous education officers on Australian teachers’ indigenous teaching and learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(8). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dillman, D. A. (2011). Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Eglash, R., Gilbert, J. E., Taylor, V., & Geier, S. R. (2017). Culturally responsive computing in urban, after-school contexts: Two approaches. Urban Education, 48(5), 629-656. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Fowler, F. J. (2013). Survey Research Methods. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Furrey, G. (2023). Pedagogical and strategic blind spots: Critical and indigenous theories of education in dialogue. Policy Futures in Education, 22(4), 692-723. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. Teachers College Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Han, C., Mohammad, N., Zhong, J., Hoon, T., & Singh, P. (2022). Educational games in teaching mathematics among the pre-services teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kadonsi, K. (2023). Integrating indigenous knowledge systems in Zambian education. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 14(3), 215-232. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Khupe, C., & Keane, M. (2017). Towards an African education research methodology: Decolonising new knowledge. Educational Research for Social Change, 6(1), 25-37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kiu, L., Luan, N., Chat, L., Rahmat, N., & Shuang, G. (2023). A study of indigenous (Orang Asli) students’ engagement in Mandarin online learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Kvale, S. (2014). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465-491. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Lipka, J., Mohatt, G. V., & The Ciulistet Group. (2005). Transforming the Culture of Schools: Yup'ik Eskimo Examples. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Luecke, D. (2023). Dakota/Lakota math connections: An epistemological framework for teaching and learning mathematics with Indigenous communities and students. Frontiers in Education, 8. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Mack, E., Augare, H., Cloud-Jones, L., Davíd, D., Gaddie, H., Honey, R., & Wippert, R. (2012). Effective practices for creating transformative informal science education programs grounded in Native ways of knowing. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(1), 49-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Mainde, D., Chola, D., & Mpolomoka, D. (2021). Interrogating civic education pedagogies that stimulate political participation in selected secondary schools in Zambia. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 05(02), 269-279. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Martin, A., Ginns, P., Anderson, M., Gibson, R., & Bishop, M. (2021). Motivation and engagement among Indigenous (Aboriginal Australian) and non-Indigenous students. Educational Psychology, 41(4), 424-445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. McCarty, T. L., & Lee, T. S. (2014). Critical culturally sustaining/revitalizing pedagogy and Indigenous education sovereignty. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 101-124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. McKinley, E. (2005). Locating the global: Culture, language and science education for Indigenous students. International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 227-241. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Mosimege, M. (2017). The incorporation of indigenous knowledge in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Pythagoras, 38(1), 1-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Munroe, E., Borden, L., Orr, A., Toney, D., & Meader, J. (2013). Decolonizing Aboriginal education in the 21st century. McGill Journal of Education, 48(2), 317-337. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Munyazikwiye, F., & Harris, G. (2022). Indigenous knowledge systems and mathematics education in Rwanda. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 26(2), 123-138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Naidoo, J. (2021). Integrating indigenous knowledge and culturally based activities in South African mathematics classrooms. African Journal of Teacher Education, 10(2), 17-36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Nkopodi, N., & Mosimege, M. (2022). Incorporating indigenous knowledge in the teaching of mathematics: A case study in South Africa. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(3), 575-593. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Owuor, J. (2008). Integrating African indigenous knowledge in Kenya’s formal education system: The potential for sustainable development. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, 2(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Pangestuti, S. (2024). Unlocking mathematical marvels: Exploring number patterns in the Rangku Alu traditional game. Jurnal Elemen, 10(2), 441-458. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Papic, M., Mulligan, J., Highfield, K., McKay-Tempest, J., & Garrett, D. (2015). The impact of a patterns and early algebra program on children in transition to school in Australian Indigenous communities. In Research in Mathematics Education in Australasia 2012-2015 (pp. 217-236). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Russo, J., Bragg, L., & Russo, T. (2021). How primary teachers use games to support their teaching of mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(4), 407-419. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Semali, L., & Kincheloe, J. (1999). What is Indigenous Knowledge? Voices from the Academy. Falmer Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Setati, M., & Adler, J. (2000). Between languages and discourses: Language practices in primary multilingual mathematics classrooms in South Africa. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(3), 243-269. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Smith, G. A. (2011). Place-based education: Learning to be where we are. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(8), 584-594. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Stavrou, S. (2021). A narrative inquiry into indigenizing school mathematics through miyō-pimōhtēwin and kamskénow. Frontiers in Education, 6. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Subedi, A. (2021). Studies in mathematics education: Curriculum analysis from indigenous knowledge and gender perspective. Interdisciplinary Research in Education, 6(1), 99-114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2008). The Research Methods Knowledge Base. Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Trumbull, E., & Nelson‐Barber, S. (2019). The ongoing quest for culturally-responsive assessment for indigenous students in the U.S. Frontiers in Education, 4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Warren, E., & Miller, J. (2013). Young Australian Indigenous students’ effective engagement in mathematics: The role of language, patterns, and structure. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(1), 151-171. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Warren, E., & Young, J. (2008). Oral language, representations and mathematical understanding: Indigenous Australian students. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 37(1), 130-137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Wotherspoon, T., & Milne, E. (2020). What do Indigenous education policy frameworks reveal about commitments to reconciliation in Canadian school systems? International Indigenous Policy Journal, 11(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. Yumiati, Y. (2023). Enhancing the ability of 'spatial nets' through outdoor learning based on traditional game 'Baju Simi'. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika, 7(4), 1054. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Zambia Ministry of General Education. (2023). National Examination Performance Report. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Zaslavsky, C. (1999). Africa Counts: Number and Pattern in African Culture. Chicago Review Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Interplay of Students’ Emotional Intelligence and Attitude toward Mathematics on Performance in Grade 10 Algebra
• Numerical Simulation of Fitzhugh-Nagumo Dynamics Using a Finite Difference-Based Method of Lines
• Fixed Point Theorem in Controlled Metric Spaces
• Usage of Moving Average to Heart Rate, Blood Pressure and Blood Sugar
• Exploring Algebraic Topology and Homotopy Theory: Methods, Empirical Data, and Numerical Examples