Understanding the Factors That Shape Teachers’ Work-Life Integration in the Malaysian Context

Authors

Anis-Farahwahida, M.K

Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kedah (Malaysia)

Azni Syafena Andin Salamat

Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kedah (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.910000831

Subject Category: Sociology

Volume/Issue: 9/10 | Page No: 10214-10229

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-11-10

Accepted: 2025-11-20

Published: 2025-11-25

Abstract

This conceptual paper examines the multifaceted factors influencing teachers’ work-life integration (WLI) in the Malaysian context, emphasising four key dimensions: workload, digitalisation, organisational support, and socio-demographic factors. Drawing on the Job Demands–Resources (JD-R) Model, Boundary Theory, and Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory, the study proposes an integrative framework that conceptualises WLI as a dynamic process shaped by the interaction of personal, organisational, and systemic elements. A synthesis of current global and Malaysian literature reveals that teachers face increasing challenges in balancing professional and personal roles due to excessive workload, bureaucratic pressures, and the rapid expansion of digital teaching responsibilities. These demands have blurred work-home boundaries, contributing to heightened stress and burnout. Conversely, supportive organisational climates, empathetic leadership, and adequate institutional resources are shown to enhance teachers’ capacity for effective integration. The paper highlights the need for holistic strategies that go beyond individual coping mechanisms to address structural and policy-level reforms. It recommends that the Malaysian Ministry of Education incorporate WLI indicators into teacher management frameworks and prioritise workload reduction, digital boundary management, and gender-sensitive support systems. By offering a theoretically grounded framework and practical recommendations, this study contributes to the ongoing discourse on teacher well-being, retention, and educational sustainability. It advances the understanding of WLI as a systemic and multidimensional construct, providing a foundation for future empirical validation and policy innovation in the Malaysian educational landscape

Keywords

Work-Life Integration, teacher workload, digitalisation, organisational support, Malaysia, Job Demands-Resources Model

Downloads

References

1. Adni, M. A., Abdullah, Z., Mukhtar, S., & Mustapha, R. (2025). Striking the Right Balance: Expert review of work-life engagement for secondary teachers in Malaysia. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 10(SI24), 285-291. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alyamy, K. F., & Sau Cheong, L. (2020). Role ambiguity, conflict and overload as predictors of emotional exhaustion: the mediation effect of teaching satisfaction and affective commitment. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 5(36), 37-55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Amzat, I. H., Kaur, A., Al-Ani, W., Mun, S. P., & Ahmadu, T. S. (2021). Teacher Burnout and Coping Strategies to Remain in Teaching Job in Malaysia: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1075-1088. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ani, S. C., Zake, N. A. M., Akbar, N. A. A., Ramzi, N. A. N., & Zamziba, N. A. M. (2025). Teaching on the edge: How workload drives burnout among Malaysian educators. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(5), 71-83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day's work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management review, 25(3), 472-491. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Azmi, S. F., Ma’rof, A. A., Abdullah, H., & Zarimohzzabeih, Z. (2023). Culture and communication styles: Collectivism vs individualism cultural orientations from Malaysian perspectives. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(16), 201-214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of managerial psychology, 22(3), 309-328. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 10(1), 25-53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bernama. (2025, July 10). MoE outlines seven measures to reduce teachers’ workload. Bernama. https://www.bernama.com/en/general/news.php?id=2443839 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chauhan, P., & Rai, S. (2024). Conceptualizing work-life integration: A review and research agenda. Asia Pacific Management Review, 29(4), 415-426. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human relations, 53(6), 747-770. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dadhwal, M. K., & Bhatheja, V. (2024). Gender Differences in Work-Life Balance in the Corporate Sector: A meta-analysis. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 29(11), 19-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Demerouti, E., Soyer, L. M., Vakola, M., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2021). The effects of a job crafting intervention on the success of an organizational change effort in a blue‐collar work environment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(2), 374-399. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied psychology, 71(3), 500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hair Jr, J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of business research, 109, 101-110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Hair Jr, J. F., Lds Gabriel, M., da Silva, D., & Braga Junior, S. (2019). Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: fundamental and practical aspects. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(4), 490-507. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Hayman, J. (2005). Psychometric assessment of an instrument designed to measure work life balance. Research and practice in human resource management, 13(1), 85-91. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American psychologist, 44(3), 513. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J. P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 5(1), 103-128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Ishak, A. R., Adnan, N. A., Aziz, M. Y., Nazli, S. N., Mualif, S. A., Ishar, S. M., Suaidi, N. A., & Aziz, M. Y. A. (2022). The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Among Teachers in Malaysia: A Cross-sectional Study. Malaysian Journal of Medicine & Health Sciences, 18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Iskandar, I. M., & As, M. A. (2025, August 20). Over 5,500 teachers retired early annually from 2022 to 2024, with most citing loss of interest. New Straits Times. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2025/08/1262925/over-5500-teachers-retired-early-annually-2022-2024-most-citing-loss [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Khalis, T., Halim, B. B. A., Ghazala, G., Sanaullah, A., & Hammad, M. (2025). A systematic review of reviews of work-life balance. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(11), 2025366-2025366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Kim, L., Maijan, P., & Yeo, S. F. (2025). Spillover effects of work–family conflict on job consequences influencing work attitudes. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 9115. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kossek, E. E., & Lee, K. H. (2022). Work-life inclusion for women’s career equality: Why it matters and what to do about it. Organizational Dynamics, 51(2), 100818. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of management journal, 52(4), 704-730. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Malay Mail. (2025, July 11). MoE rolls out seven steps to cut teachers’ workload, scrap low-impact events. Malay Mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2025/07/11/moe-rolls-out-seven-steps-to-cut-teachers-workload-scrap-low-impact-events/183537 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Malay Mail. (2025, July 7). Teaching or paperwork? NUTP pushes for MoE task force to tackle workload crisis. Malay Mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2025/07/07/teaching-or-paperwork-nutp-pushes-for-moe-task-force-to-tackle-workload-crisis/183143 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Mordi, C., Ajonbadi, H. A., & Adekoya, O. D. (2024). Technology infiltration: permeable boundaries and work–life spillover experiences among academics in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personnel Review, 53(5), 1269-1288. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. New Straits Times. (2025, July 7) NUTP calls for special committee to address teacher workload. New Straits Times. https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2025/07/1241186/nutp-calls-special-committee-address-teacher-workload [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Njoli, L. (2024). Remote work and work-life conflict during the Covid-19 pandemic: A scoping review (Master's thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (South Africa)). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Nor, S. N. S., Salleh, R., Sheikh, S., & Saleem, M. (2024). Work-Life Balance and Work-Life Integration: A Comparative Analysis through Conceptual Distinction. BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND STRATEGY Учредители: Macrothink Institute, Inc., 16(1), 39. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ragu-Nathan, T. S., Tarafdar, M., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Tu, Q. (2008). The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: Conceptual development and empirical validation. Information systems research, 19(4), 417-433. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Scholze, A., & Hecker, A. (2024). The job demands-resources model as a theoretical lens for the bright and dark side of digitization. Computers in Human Behavior, 155, 108177. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Shah, S. M., Noranee, S., Munir, Z. A., Noranee, S., Shahruddin, S., & Mujanah, S. (2024). The Influence of work-life balance, workload and work environment on burnout among teachers in Melaka Tengah District, Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review, 16(1), 137-152. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Quantitative Workload Inventory. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Tan, X., Cheng, G., & Ling, M. H. (2025). Artificial intelligence in teaching and teacher professional development: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100355. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. The Sun. (2025, July 7). NUTP urges special committee to tackle teacher workload. The Sun. https://thesun.my/news/malaysia-news/nutp-urges-special-committee-to-tackle-teacher-workload-bd14425646/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles