A Systematic Review on the Factors Affecting Teacher’s Job Performance: Comparative Analysis between the Philippines and the United States of America (2015-2025)
Authors
Residential Life, Galena City School District (United States of America (USA))
Residential Life, Galena City School District (United States of America (USA))
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.903SEDU0702
Subject Category: Education
Volume/Issue: 9/26 | Page No: 9255-9262
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-10
Accepted: 2025-11-20
Published: 2025-11-28
Abstract
This systematic review analyzed empirical studies (2015–2025) on the major factors influencing teachers’ job performance in the Philippines and the United States, focusing on leadership, organizational climate, professional development, and cultural adaptation. Across fifty peer-reviewed studies, findings consistently identified leadership as the strongest predictor of job performance, with positive correlations (r/β=.45-.67 PH; .50-.60 US). In the Philippines, transformational and democratic leadership foster collaboration and motivation, while in the U.S., instructional leadership with feedback and coaching enhances performance outcomes. Teacher competence and self-efficacy act as mediators (r/β=.48-.58 PH; .40-.50 US), indicating that confidence transforms leadership influence into measurable results. Organizational climate showed contrasting patterns: supportive environments in the Philippines (r = .50-.55) improved engagement, whereas high accountability stress in the U.S. (β = -.29) decreased satisfaction and retention. Both contexts affirm the critical role of professional development and cultural responsiveness in sustaining motivation and teacher growth. Framework comparisons revealed that the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST) emphasize reflective and developmental growth, while the U.S. model values data-based accountability and performance metrics. Despite philosophical contrasts, both systems aim to improve instructional quality. The evidence suggests that combining the PPST’s mentorship-driven framework with the U.S. accountability model can create a balanced system where growth and measurable performance coexist, underscoring that effective leadership, empowerment, and supportive school cultures remain universal foundations for sustaining teacher excellence.
Keywords
Transformational and democratic leadership; Organizational climate; Professional development
Downloads
References
1. Backes, B., & Goldhaber, D. (2023). The relationship between Pandemic-Era teacher licensure waiv-ers and teacher demographics, retention, and effectiveness in New Jersey. In CALDER (No. 286-0623). https://caldercenter.org/sites/default/files/CALDER%20WP%20286-0623.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bacus, R. C., Picardal, M. T., Perez, N. B., & Balo, V. T. M. (2024). Predictors of beginning teachers’ teaching performance. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1375726 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Baluyos, G. R., Rivera, H. L., & Baluyos, E. L. (2019). Teachers’ job satisfaction and work perfor-mance. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 07(08), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.78015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Cabayag, S. J. L., & Guhao, E. S., Jr. (2024). SELF-EFFICACY, JOB PERFORMANCE, AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP: a STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL ON ORGANIZA-TIONAL COMMITMENT AMONG PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS. European Journal of Education Studies, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i1.5168 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Cabradilla, M. T. (2025). Teachers’ competency based on the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers I-III: basis for a training program. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLI-NARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS, 08(04). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v8-i04-64 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Canuto, P. P., Choycawen, M., & Pagdawan, R. (2024). THE INFLUENCE OF TEACHING COMPE-TENCIES ON TEACHERS’ PERFORMANCE AND STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN PRIMARY SCIENCE EDUCATION. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(1), 29–47. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.29 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. D’Brot, J., Center for Assessment, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2022). Operational best practices for accountability. National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED617840.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Eryilmaz, N., Kennedy, A. I., Strietholt, R., & Johansson, S. (2025). Teacher job satisfaction: Interna-tional evidence on the role of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. Studies in Edu-cational Evaluation, 86, 101474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2025.101474 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Gay, G. (2018, January 26). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. Third edition. Multicultural Education Series. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581130 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Goldhaber, D., Grout, C., Wolff, M., American Institutes for Research, Duke University, Northwest-ern University, Stanford University, University of Missouri-Columbia, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University of Texas at Dallas, & University of Washington. (2022). How well do pro-fessional reference ratings predict teacher performance? In NATIONAL CENTER for ANALYSIS of LONGITUDINAL DATA in EDUCATION RESEARCH (No. 272–1022). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED625526.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Hanushek, E. A., Rivkin, S. G., Schiman, J. C., & National Bureau of Economic Research. (2016). Dynamic effects of teacher turnover on the quality of instruction (Working Paper 22472). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w22472/w22472.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Hutchins, E. (2024). The impact of feedback on teacher professional growth. DigitalCom-mons@UMaine. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/3933?utm_source=digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu%2Fetd%2F3933&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Kanya, N., Fathoni, A. B., & Ramdani, Z. (2021). Factors affecting teacher performance. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 10(4), 1462. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21693 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Kini, T., Podolsky, A., & Learning Policy Institute. (2016). Does teaching experience increase teacher effectiveness? A review of the research. In Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/product-files/Teaching_Experience_Report_June_2016.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Li, L., Kanchanapoom, K., Deeprasert, J., Duan, N., & Qi, Z. (2025). Unveiling the factors shaping teacher job performance: exploring the interplay of personality traits, perceived organizational sup-port, self-efficacy, and job satisfaction. BMC Psychology, 13(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-024-02324-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Ma, X., Shen, J., Reeves, P. L., Wu, H., Roberts, L., Zheng, Y., & Chen, Q. (2024). Effects of the “High Impact Leadership for School Renewal” Project on principal leadership, school leadership, and student achievement. Education Sciences, 14(6), 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060600 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Modesto, O. P. (2020, August 27). A phenomenological study of Filipino immigrant teachers in South Texas. NSUWorks. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol25/iss8/18/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. NCTQ. (2019). State of the States 2019: Teacher and Principal Evaluation Policy. National Council on Teacher Quality (NCTQ). https://teacherquality.nctq.org/pages/State-of-the-States-2019:-Teacher-and-Principal-Evaluation-Policy [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Nielsen, A. (2016). Second career teachers and (mis)recognitions of professional identities. School Leadership and Management, 36(2), 221–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2016.1209180 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Özgenel, M., Yağan, E., & Baydar, F. (2025). Teacher performance and professional development as predictors of school effectiveness. Athens Journal, 10, 1–16. https://www.athensjournals.gr/education/2024-5206-AJE-Ozgenel-07.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Pa-alisbo, M. A. C. & St. Theresa International College. (2017). The 21st century skills and job per-formance of teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.8(No.32). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED578609.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Medicine, 18(3), e1003583. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Parveen, K., Tran, P. Q. B., Kumar, T., & Shah, A. H. (2022). Impact of principal leadership styles on teacher job performance: An Empirical investigation. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.814159 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Rosales, R. R. (n.d.). Unheard voices of Filipino immigrant teachers in the United States. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Filipino&ff1=locUnited+States&id=ED657885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2018). How to do a Systematic Review: a best prac-tice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses. An-nual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Talib, R., & Poralan, P. (2025). Teaching efficacy and motivation as determinants of job performance of MAPEH teachers. Psychology and Education a Multidisciplinary Journal, 38(10), 1095–1114. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.381002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Tarraya, H. O. & Department of Education, Philippines. (2023). Teachers’ workload Policy: Its im-pact on Philippine public school teachers. In Puissant (Vol. 5) [Journal-article]. https://puissant.stepacademic.net [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Tejero, E. P. B., & Aoanan, G. (2024). Leadership Styles, organizational climate and work engage-ment of Teachers in Region XII: An Explanatory Sequential design. TOFEDU the Future of Education Journal, 3(5), 1704–1724. https://doi.org/10.61445/tofedu.v3i5.321 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Wayne, A., Garet, M., Brown, S., Reckles, J., Song, M., & Manzeske, D. (2017). Early Implementa-tion findings from a study of teacher and principal Performance Measurement and Feedback | IES. In-stitute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/use-work/resource-library/report/evaluation-report/early-implementation-findings-study-teacher-and-principal-performance-measurement-and-feedback [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Assessment of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Repositioning TVET for Economic Development in Nigeria
- Teachers’ Use of Assure Model Instructional Design on Learners’ Problem Solving Efficacy in Secondary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya
- “E-Booksan Ang Kaalaman”: Development, Validation, and Utilization of Electronic Book in Academic Performance of Grade 9 Students in Social Studies
- Analyzing EFL University Students’ Academic Speaking Skills Through Self-Recorded Video Presentation
- Major Findings of The Study on Total Quality Management in Teachers’ Education Institutions (TEIs) In Assam – An Evaluative Study