Optimizing Teamwork for Sustainability: Best Practice Strategies for Small and Medium – Sized Construction Enterprises in Malaysia
Authors
Faculty of Technology and Applied Science, Open University (Malaysia)
Faculty of Technology and Applied Science, Open University (Malaysia)
Faculty of Technology and Applied Science, Open University (Malaysia)
Faculty of Technology and Applied Science, Open University (Malaysia)
Faculty of Technology and Applied Science, Open University (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100129
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 1613-1620
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-16
Accepted: 2025-11-24
Published: 2025-12-02
Abstract
The Malaysian construction industry, a vital pillar of the national economy, is characterised by intense competition and market saturation, creating a precarious operating environment for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). A significant contributor to the high failure rate among these contractors is the chronic deficiency of effective teamwork within organizational structures. This study aims to establish a robust framework of best practices to enhance teamwork performance, thereby fostering resilience and long-term sustainability. Employing a quantitative methodology, data was collected via a structured questionnaire survey distributed to 67 G5-class contractors in the Klang Valley, Malaysia's primary construction hub. The research was structured in three phases: first, establishing the theoretical underpinnings of team formation via Tuckman's model; second, diagnosing critical impediments to teamwork; and third, formulating and validating a set of best practices. Findings reveal that the most critical barriers are multifaceted: personal ego at the individual level, a lack of leader motivation and enablement at the management level, and the pervasive "over-the-wall" syndrome at the cultural level. The study culminates in a hierarchy of 17 inter-related best practices. The top-tier strategies advocate for a synergistic approach: leadership must proactively motivate teamwork (management), individuals must be prepared to embrace behavioural change (individual), and a culture of open communication must be institutionalized (cultural). The study concludes that optimizing teamwork is not a unilateral responsibility but a tripartite commitment requiring initiated leadership, adopted individual change, and a sustained collaborative culture. This research provides an actionable, evidence-based roadmap for SME contractors to transform their operational dynamics, enhancing their competitive advantage and sustainability in an unforgiving market.
Keywords
teamwork, construction SMEs, sustainability, best practices
Downloads
References
1. Ahmad, Z., & Ibrahim, K. (2020). Fragmentation issues in the Malaysian construction industry: A review of the past decade. International Journal of Construction Management, 20(4), 345-359. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Ali, H. A. O., Tam, N. Y., & Chethana, S. L. (2022). The impact of teamwork on project performance in construction SMEs: A structural equation modeling approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(9), 3425-3445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Azhar, S. (2017). Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, benefits, risks, and challenges for the AEC industry. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 11(3), 241-252. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) Malaysia. (2023). Construction Industry Quarterly Report, Q4 2022. Kuala Lumpur: CIDB Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Durdyev, S., & Hosseini, M. R. (2020). The path towards construction 4.0: An integration of BIM, IoT, and digital twin. Buildings, 10(12), 231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Edmondson, A. C. (2018). The fearless organization: Creating psychological safety in the workplace for learning, innovation, and growth. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Janis, I. L. (2009). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Khan, K., Turner, J. R., & Maqsood, T. (2021). The impact of project leadership on team performance in construction projects: The mediating role of teamwork. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(5), 1123-1145. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Le, P. T., Kirytopoulos, K., Chileshe, N., & Rameezdeen, R. (2021). Taxonomy of team-level factors influencing project team performance in construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 37(3), 04021008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Lim, Y. W., & Ling, F. Y. Y. (2022). The role of teamwork in the performance of small and medium-sized construction enterprises. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 27(1), 1-20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ling, F. Y. Y., & Bui, T. T. (2020). Facilitators for building teamwork in construction projects: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(7), 04020068. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Mathieu, J. E., Gallagher, P. T., Domingo, M. A., & Klock, E. A. (2019). Embracing complexity: Reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 17-46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Melé, D. (2016). Understanding humanistic management. Humanistic Management Journal, 1(1), 33-55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Moehler, R. C., Hope, N., & Al-Saadi, S. (2021). The 'evolution' of leadership styles and the effect on organisational resilience in construction projects. Construction Innovation, 21(2), 217-236. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Mumford, M. D., Todd, E. M., & Higgs, C. (2017). Leading for creativity: Results from a series of national and international studies. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(3), 205-216. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Nawi, M. N. M., Bahaudin, A. Y., & Kamar, K. A. M. (2021). Critical success factors for implementing teamwork in Malaysian construction projects. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 8(2), 45-56. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Ofori-Kuragu, J. K., Baiden, B. K., & Badu, E. (2021). Key performance indicators for project success in the Ghanaian construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(10), 3013-3031. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Othman, R., & Shahidan, S. H. (2022). Overcoming the over-the-wall syndrome: Implementing integrated project delivery (IPD) in Malaysian construction. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-08-2021-0421 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Rahman, H. A., Karim, S. B. A., & Danuri, M. S. M. (2020). The relationship between humanistic leadership, teamwork, and contractor performance. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(4), 1120-1127. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63(6), 384–399. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Yang, F., Li, X., & Zhang, L. (2021). Linking transformational leadership to team performance in construction projects: The mediating role of teamwork. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 682947. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Zhao, D., & Wang, C. (2022). The impact of digital communication tools on mitigating silo mentality in construction projects. Automation in Construction, 143, 104558. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar