Comparison of Marriage Dissolution from the Perspectives of Civil and Sharia Law in the Federal Territories of Malaysia

This article looks at an analysis of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 [Act 164] ('the LRA') and the Islamic Family Law (Federal Territories) Act 1984 [Act 303] regarding the scope, process and principles for divorce in Malaysia. This article is a comparative study of the two Acts and outlines the marriage duration, forms of divorce, reconciliation process and court jurisdictions. The results suggest Act 164 is relatively secular, primarily concerned with rights of individual and formal judicial due process only, while Act 303 is based on Sharia values that support morality and religious obligations as well as social justice in separation. Despite difference in approach and underlying philosophy, both the legal systems share the common goal of ensuring justice and other welfare interests for couples and the family institution in Malaysia’s plural society. The study has dominated positive impacts, in terms of increasing public knowledge about the differences in jurisdiction and principles between two systems, i.e., general law (civil) with Islamic law (Sharia), which will reduce confusion around interfaith divorces or a change of religion. Additionally, this article is an important contribution for policy developers, legal practitioners; religious scholars and family centre in developing more relevant household justice policies to promote interfaith tolerance and social harmony in Malaysia.

Comparative Analysis, Dissolution of Marriage

1. Abdul Monir Yaacob. (2019). Pentadbiran undang-undang Islam di Malaysia. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad Ibrahim. (1997). Undang-undang keluarga Islam di Malaysia. Malayan Law Journal Sdn. Bhd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Alias Azhar, & Zaini Nasohah. (2018). Isu dan cabaran pelaksanaan undang-undang keluarga Islam di Malaysia. Penerbit UKM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anuar, M. K., & Mohd. Nor, A. (2020). Dualisme perundangan di Malaysia: Analisis hubungan antara Mahkamah Sivil dan Mahkamah Sharia. Jurnal Undang-undang dan Masyarakat, 24(1), 45–60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Armaz Ariffin, Ahmad Hidayat Buang, & Noraini Md. Hashim. (2012). Pembubaran perkahwinan dalam Islam: Analisis terhadap kaedah talak dan fasakh menurut undang-undang keluarga Islam di Malaysia. Jurnal Sharia, 20(3), 277–298. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Hashim, N. H., & Mohamad, A. (2021). Undang-undang keluarga Islam dan sivil: Suatu perbandingan. Penerbit Universiti Malaya. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Ishak, S. (2020). Institusi perkahwinan dan perceraian di Malaysia: Perspektif sivil dan Sharia. Penerbit Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Department of Sharia Judiciary Malaysia (JKSM). (2022). JKSM Annual Report 2022. Putrajaya: Department of Sharia Judiciary Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jabatan Kehakiman Sharia Perak. (2025). Prosedur pembubaran perkahwinan di Mahkamah Sharia Negeri Perak. Jabatan Kehakiman Sharia Perak. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Khairuldin, W. M. K. F. W., Anas, W. N. I. W. N., Embong, A. H., Ismail, D., & Hanapi, M. S. The Challenges Of Fatwa Institutions In Malaysia In Facing The Progress Of Science And Technology. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 10(3), 1806-1813. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kairuldin, W. M. K. F. W. (2020). Pengurusan Fatwa di Malaysia. Kuala Terengganu: Penerbit Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Khidmat Guaman. (2025). Panduan prosedur perceraian Mahkamah Sharia dan Sivil. Khidmat Guaman Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Mahmood Zuhdi Abd Majid. (2018). Falsafah undang-undang Islam. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Mohamed Adil, M. A. (2014 & 2017). Konflik bidang kuasa Mahkamah Sharia dan Sivil di Malaysia. Shah Alam: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi MARA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Norhafeez Mohamed. (2020). Undang-undang keluarga Malaysia: Isu dan pelaksanaan. Kuala Lumpur: International Law Book Services (ILBS). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Syazmeen, N. (2022). Fasakh dalam undang-undang keluarga Islam di Malaysia: Prosedur dan implikasinya terhadap pasangan. Jurnal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat, 26(2), 112–124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Wan Abdul Halim, W. M., & Noor Aziah, M. A. (2017). Harmonisasi undang-undang keluarga Islam dan Sivil di Malaysia: Isu dan cabaran. Jurnal Sharia, 25(2), 233–250. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Zaini Yusnita. (2017). Implikasi pertukaran agama terhadap perkahwinan sivil. Jurnal Undang-Undang Malaysia, 2, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Zaleha Kamaruddin, & Raihanah Abdullah. (2011). Undang-undang keluarga Islam di Malaysia. Selangor: Pearson Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.