Looking at Service Delivery from a Social Justice Perspective: A Case of a Selected Local Municipality in Limpopo Province

This study analyses service delivery from a Social Justice standpoint in a local municipality selected from the Limpopo Province. Employing case study qualitative research design, the study gathered data through face-to-face interviews with municipal officials and residents which were then supplemented by document review of the municipal plans, budgets, and reports. The results show that service delivery is not consistent and is affected by governance problems, lack of institutional capacity, shortage of financial resources, and a low level of public involvement. Not only that, but the structural inequalities also caused by the spatial planning of the past deepen the divide to such an extent that the areas that were left out in the past become the ones that do not get basic services for a long time. The research discovers that these systemic deficiencies erode social justice's distributive and procedural elements. The article offers several suggestions for overcoming these problems starting with an agreement that emphasizes distributive justice in the allocation of resources, raising the standards of governance and accountability, making public participation a regular feature of people's lives, and carrying out the spatial interventions designed to eliminate the effects of the spatial inequalities. The study argues for the urgency of municipalities embracing justice-oriented strategies that facilitate not only technical service provision but also the provision of equitable, inclusive, and sustainable services for all residents.

social justice, local governance, equity, public participation

1. Alexander, P., Runciman, C., Maruping, B., Moloto, B., Sibanda, S., Tausig, M., & Thoane, M. (2018). Protest and public participation in South Africa: Findings from the Civic Action for Public Participation Project. University of Johannesburg. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216 224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Booysen, S. (2021). Precarious power: Compliance and discontent under Ramaphosa. Wits University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77 101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cameron, R. (2018). The persistence of local government problems in South Africa. Local Government Studies, 44(2), 166 186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Christopher, A. J. (2022). South Africa’s spatial inequalities: Legacies of apartheid and contemporary challenges. GeoJournal, 87, 1521 1534. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Department of Cooperative Governance. (2020). Local government state of the nation report. Government of South Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fraser, N. (2008). Justice Scales: The Future of Political Space in a Globalizing World. Polity Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Continuum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Harrison, P., & Todes, A. (2017). Spatial transformations in a “loosening state”: South Africa in a comparative perspective. Geoforum, 79, 153 163. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hlatshwayo, M. (2021). Local governance in South Africa: Representation and justice. Transformation, 107, 24 43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kumi, E., & Msuya, I. (2018). Procedural justice as a prerequisite for Public Service delivery in Africa. Journal of African Public Administration and Management, 10(1), 1 18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Madumo, O. S. (2022). The governance capacity conundrum in South African municipalities. Administratio Publica, 30(2), 4 22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mabin, A. (2020). Inequality and the post-apartheid spatial order. Journal of Southern African Studies, 46(6), 1089 1104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mashamaite, K. (2020). Public participation and elite capture in local governance. African Journal of Public Affairs, 12(1), 80 95. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mathebula, N. E., & Sebola, M. P. (2021). Service delivery protests and trust in local government in South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 56(3), 487 502. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Mukonza, R. M., & Twala, C. (2020). Participatory governance and community based monitoring in rural municipalities. Africa Insight, 50(1), 80 96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Ngamlana, N., & Mathoho, M. (2020). Supporting citizen participation in South African municipalities. Journal of Public Administration, 55(4), 623 639. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Nzimakwe, T. (2021). Challenges in rural local municipalities of South Africa. Journal of Local Government Studies, 18(1), 32 49. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533 544. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Pieterse, E. (2019). City futures: Confronting the crisis of urban development in Africa. UCT Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Runciman, C. (2020). Protest trends in South Africa: Causes, characteristics, and outcomes. Transformation, 103, 1 24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sekgala, M. P. (2022). Infrastructure backlogs and equity in rural municipalities in Limpopo. South African Journal of Public Administration, 57(2), 245 262. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Turok, I. (2021). Spatial inequality in South Africa: Progress and prospects. Development Southern Africa, 38(6), 857 873. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Williams, P. (2021). Evaluating participatory governance in South Africa’s IDP processes. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 24, 1 18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar