Capital Punishment in Sacred Texts: A Comparative Doctrinal Study of Islam and Christianity

This article explores how Islam and Christianity address capital punishment within their sacred texts. While most research emphasizes legal, ethical, or social aspects, the theological and scriptural foundations remain underexamined. Using a comparative doctrinal approach, the study analyzes the Qur’an and Hadith and the Bible to examine how each tradition defines the legitimacy, purpose, and limits of the death penalty. It highlights the balance between divine justice and human imperfection, as well as tensions between retribution and restoration. The findings reveal both common themes, such as the moral function of punishment, and notable differences, particularly in the areas of mercy, forgiveness, and non-violence. By foregrounding these scriptural insights, the article deepens understanding of religious perspectives on justice and supports further comparative theological research.

Capital Punishment, The Qur’an

1. Abou El Fadl, K. (2001). Speaking in God’s name: Islamic law, authority and women. Oneworld. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Abou El Fadl, K. (2006). The great theft: Wrestling Islam from the extremists. HarperOne. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Abū Mālik Kamāl ibn al-Sayyid Sālim. (n.d.). Ṣaḥīḥ fiqh al-sunna (Vol. 4). Maktabah al-Tawfīqiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. ‘Abd al-Razzāq al-Ṣanʿānī. (n.d.). Al-Muṣannaf (Vol. 10). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal. (n.d.). Musnad Aḥmad (Hadith No. 450). Dār al-Salām. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ahmed, S. (2025). Hudud and the Penal Code 1860: A comparative study on criminal law of Islam and Bangladesh [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Jagannath University, Dhaka, Bangladesh. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. An-Na’im, A. A. (2008). Islam and the secular state: Negotiating the future of Shari’a. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674031319 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Awwa, M. S. (1983). Fī uṣūl al-niẓām al-jināʾī al-Islāmī [On the foundations of the Islamic criminal system]. Nahḍat Miṣr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bayraktar, K. (1968). Ölüm cezası [The death penalty]. Mukayeseli Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, 54–55. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bedau, H. A. (Ed.). (2017). The death penalty in America: Current controversies. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Brugger, E. C. (2014). Capital punishment and Roman Catholic moral tradition (2nd ed.). University of Notre Dame Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.21995597 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. al-Bukhārī, M. ibn Ismāʿīl. (2015). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Dār al-Ḥaḍārah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Camus, A., & Koestler, A. (1986). Ölüm cezası üstüne düşünceler (A. Sirmen, Trans.). Alan Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Campion, J. (1911). Capital punishment. In The Catholic Encyclopedia (Vol. 11, pp. 79–81). Robert Appleton Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Cavanaugh, W. T. (2009). The myth of religious violence: Secular ideology and the roots of modern conflict. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195385045.001.0001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Demirel, C. (2008). Ölüm cezası. In Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm ansiklopedisi (Vol. 33, pp. 152–158). Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Dönmezer, S., & Erman, S. (1994). Nazari ve tatbiki ceza hukuku (Cilt 2). Genesis Kitabevi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. El-Awa, M. S. (1993). Punishment in Islamic law: A comparative study. American Trust Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Eliade, M., & Couliano, I. P. (1995). Dinler tarihi sözlüğü (A. Kazancıgil, Çev.). İnsan Yayınları. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Elon, M. (2007). Capital punishment. In Encyclopaedia Judaica (2nd ed., Vol. 4, pp. 445–446). Keter Publishing House. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Fierro, M. (2007). Idraʾū l-ḥudūd bi-l-shubuhāt: When lawful violence meets doubt. Hawwa, 5(2–3), 207–238. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920807X207176 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Finucane, R. C. (1914). Inquisition, The. In J. Hastings (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of religion and ethics (Vol. 7, pp. 251–253). T. & T. Clark. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Francis. (2018). Rescriptum modifying Catechism of the Catholic Church §2267. Acta Apostolicae Sedis, 110, 1193–1194. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Gemalmaz, M. S. (2001). Ulusalüstü insan hakları hukukunun genel teorisine giriş [Introduction to the general theory of supranational human rights law]. Legal Yayıncılık. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. al-Ghazālī, A. H. (1997). Al-Mustaṣfā fī ʿilm al-uṣūl (Vol. 1). Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Güriz, A. (2018). Hukuk felsefesi (7. baskı). Siyasal Kitabevi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. al-Ḥākim al-Naysābūrī. (1990). Al-Mustadrak ʿalā al-Ṣaḥīḥayn. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Hallaq, W. B. (2009). Sharīʿa: Theory, practice, transformations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511626665 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Harman, Ö. F. (1997). Evrensel dinlerin insan haklarına bakışı [The perspective of universal religions on human rights]. In Uluslararası Demokrasi, Hukuk ve İnsan Hakları Konferansı (26–28 Eylül 1997, Diyarbakır). Dicle Üniversitesi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Hauerwas, S. (1991). The peaceable kingdom: A primer in Christian ethics. University of Notre Dame Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Hood, R., & Hoyle, C. (2015). The death penalty: A worldwide perspective (5th ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Ibn al-ʿArabī, A. B. (2003). Aḥkām al-Qurʾān (Vol. 2). Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr. (n.d.). Al-Istidhkār (Vol. 7). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Ibn ‘Ābidīn, M. A. (1984). Ḥāshiyat radd al-muḥtār ‘alā al-durr al-mukhtār (Vol. 6). Dār al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ibn Fūzān, S. (2002). Al-Mulakhkhaṣ al-fiqhī (Vols. 1–2). Dār al-ʿĀṣimah. (Original work published 1423 AH) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Ibn Ḥazm. (1981). Al-Muḥallā bi-al-āthār (Vol. 12). Dār al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Ibn Mājah, M. ibn Yazīd. (n.d.). Sunan Ibn Mājah. (Book of ḥudūd, Hadith No. 2553). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Ibn Manẓūr. (1990). Lisān al-ʿArab (Vols. 1–15). Dār Ṣādir. (Original work published ca. 1290 CE) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Ibn Nujaym, Z. (n.d.). Al-Ashbāh wa al-naẓāʾir (M. M. al-Ḥāfiẓ, Ed.). (n.d.). Dar al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah. (Original work published ca. 970/1563) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Ibn Qudāmah, M. ibn Aḥmad. (n.d.). Al-Mughnī (Vol. 9). Dār al-Fikr. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Imbert, J. (1992). Ölüm cezası (A. Kazancıgil, Trans.). Communication Publications. (Original work published 1989) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. John Paul II. (1995). Evangelium vitae. Libreria Editrice Vaticana. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Kadivar, M. (2011). From retributive to restorative punishment. In A. Afsaruddin (Ed.), Islam and transitional justice. Springer. pp. 17–34. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. al-Kāsānī, ʿA. ibn M. (n.d.). Badāʾiʿ al-ṣanāʾiʿ fī tartīb al-sharāʾiʿ (Vol. 7). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Kamali, M. H. (1995). Punishment in Islamic law: A critique of the Hudud Bill of Kelantan. Ilmiah Publishers. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Kamali, M. H. (2003). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence. Islamic Texts Society. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. Kirâz, A. H. (1981). Al-qiṣāṣ fī al-nafs fī al-fiqh al-Islāmī: Dirāsa muqārana [Retaliation for life in Islamic jurisprudence: A comparative study]. [Publisher not identified]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Lloyd of Hampstead, L. (1972). Introduction to jurisprudence (3rd ed.). Praeger. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. Long, M. G. (2021). American evangelical support for capital punishment. Journal of Church and State, 63(4), 612–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/csaa087 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. al-Māwardī, A. al-Ḥ. (n.d.). Al-Aḥkām al-sulṭāniyyah. Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. McCord, J. (2014). Christianity and the death penalty: A doctrinal examination. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Megivern, J. J. (1997). The death penalty: An historical and theological survey. Paulist Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Mumisa, M. (2015). Sharia law and the death penalty: Would abolition of the death penalty be unfaithful to the message of Islam? Penal Reform International. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj. (n.d.). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim (Hadith No. 1671). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Ostrogorsky, G. (1995). History of the Byzantine State (F. Işıltan, Trans.). Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Peters, R. (2005). Crime and punishment in Islamic law: Theory and practice from the sixteenth to the twenty-first century. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614451 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. al-Qarāfī, A. (n.d.). Al-Furūq (M. A. Sarrāj, Ed.). Dar al-Kutub al-ʿArabiyyah. (Original work published ca. 4) [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Radelet, M. L. (2010). The evolving debate on the death penalty. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102535 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. Saeed, A. (2017). Human rights and Islam: An introduction to key debates. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784716585 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. al-Sarakhsī, M. ibn Aḥmad. (1993). Al-Mabsūṭ (Vol. 10). Dār al-Maʿrifah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Schaft, D. S. (1911). Discipline (Christian). In J. Hastings (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of religion and ethics (Vol. 4, pp. 717–721). T&T Clark; Charles Scribner’s Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Şafak, A. (1977). Mezheplerarası mukayeseli İslam ceza hukuku [Comparative Islamic penal law among schools of jurisprudence]. [Publisher not identified]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. ‘Uddah, ʿA. (1985). Al-Tashrīʿ al-jināʾī al-Islāmī muqāranan bi-al-qānūn al-waḍʿī (Vol. 11). Muʾassasat al-Risālah. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). (2000). Responsibility, rehabilitation, and restoration: A Catholic perspective on crime and criminal justice. USCCB Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar