Level of Knowledge among Sangguniang Kabataan Officials Regarding Parliamentary Procedures and Resolution-Making

Authors

Emerson John C. Escuyos

Senior High School Students, Dapa National High School, Dapa, Surigao del Norte (Philippines)

Mariel C. Dormiendo

Senior High School Students, Dapa National High School, Dapa, Surigao del Norte (Philippines)

Jade Ann D. Longos

Senior High School Students, Dapa National High School, Dapa, Surigao del Norte (Philippines)

Reshelle A. Guiral

Senior High School Students, Dapa National High School, Dapa, Surigao del Norte (Philippines)

Tovy Boy S. Libay

Senior High School Students, Dapa National High School, Dapa, Surigao del Norte (Philippines)

Oscar S. Recto, Jr

Teacher, Dapa National High School, Dapa, Surigao del Norte (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100551

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 7097-7106

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-04

Accepted: 2025-12-12

Published: 2025-12-23

Abstract

Youth participation in governance is essential to democratic development, yet many Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) officials lack the procedural knowledge needed for effective leadership—particularly in parliamentary procedures and resolution-making. This study surveyed 94 SK officials in Dapa, Surigao del Norte using a quantitative-descriptive approach to assess their core, technical, and applied knowledge. Guided by Albert Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory, the research examined how demographic factors, training exposure, and environmental support influence procedural competence. Results showed that SK officials had an overall mean score of 3.21, interpreted as “Agree” and qualitatively described as “Moderately Knowledgeable.” The highest-rated item was understanding quorum requirements (M = 3.81), while the lowest was procedural motions (M = 2.78). Technical knowledge scored a mean of 3.09, and applied procedural knowledge averaged 2.94, indicating gaps in practical application. Common challenges included lack of formal training (M = 3.67), time constraints (M = 3.42), and limited mentorship (M = 3.38). Statistical analysis confirmed a significant relationship (p < 0.05) between parliamentary knowledge and resolution quality. The study recommends targeted capacity-building programs, mentorship initiatives, and institutional support to enhance procedural fluency and governance effectiveness among SK officials

Keywords

Resolution Making, Sangguniang Kabataan Officials, Quorum

Downloads

References

1. Alampay, E. G. A., & Angeles, L. E. (2012). Active Citizenship among the Youth: differences among Sangguniang Kabataan leaders and their constituents. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 56(2), 127-150. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alampay, E., & Angeles, M. (2012). Youth civic engagement and political participation in the Philippines. Atienza, M. E. (2006). The local government system in the Philippines: Evolution and decentralization. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Brillantes, A. B., Jr., & Fernandez, M. T. (2011). Theory and practice of local governance in the Philippines. Quezon City: National College of Public Administration and Governance, University of the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Castillo, M. A. I., Cruz, D. C., Lapaz, J. L., Marcha, K. G., Padillo, J. V., Vegiga, F. J., & Vallespin, M. R. D. (2024). Assessing Demographics, Perceptions, and Participation: A Study on Sangguniang Kabataan (SK) Effectiveness and Improvement Suggestions. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Chiu S and Wong K (2018) Happiness of Hong Kong youth from 2000 to 2014: empirical evidence on the differential impact of socioeconomic conditions on youth versus other age groups. Journal of Youth Studies 21, 253–271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Colleen Lewis: ‘Barriers to Prioritising Education and Training for Parliamentarians: Role Complexity and the Media’ Parliamentary Affairs 65(2012), pp. 699–714; Colleen Lewis: ‘Compulsory Professional Development for Members of Parliament’, in Colleen Lewis and Ken Coghill (eds), Parliamentarians’ Professional Development: The Need for Reform. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Danlag, M., & Calva, J. (2024). 1st Lecture Notes – Parliamentary Practice and Procedure. University of the Philippines System. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Davids I., Theron F and Maphunye K J., (eds) (2005): The strategic role of development NGOs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. In Davids I., Theron F and Maphunye K J., (eds). Participatory development in South Africa: A development management perspective. Pretoria: van Schaik. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government. (2012). Capacity and competency requirements in local government. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. DILG Mamburao. (2018). Introduction of the SK Reform Act of 2015 [PowerPoint slides]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Formoso, C. S. (2020). Parliamentary rules and procedures: Its relevance in the Philippine barangay governance. International Journal of Research Publications, 57(1), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Research and Management. (2024). Project Implementation of Sangguniang [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Laws Learned. (2024). Understanding the role of parliamentary procedure in law. https://lawslearned.com/role-of-parliamentary-procedure/ Lilleker, [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Lising, S. D. B., & Rivera, M. A. (2024). Sangguniang Kabataan competencies in Quezon Province: A basis for capacity development program. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 13(13), 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. D. G., & Koc-Michalska, K. (2016). Online political communication and political engagement: A psychological perspective. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mascara, A. C. (2024). Development Contributions of Sangguniang Kabataan Officials: The Case of Cawayan Linuk, Marantao, Lanao del Sur. Philippine EJournals. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Moner, J. M. B., & Tomaro, J. A. (2018). Determining the motivations for political participation among elected youth leaders. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 62(1), 1–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mutiarin, D., et al. (2020). Youth political participation in policy processes: War on Drugs and peacebuilding in Southeast Asia. Journal of Government and Politics, 12(1), 1–15. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Palomares, P. P., Cadutdut, D. E., Amod, A. F., & Tomaro, Q. P. V. (2021). Determining the motivations for political participation among elected youth leaders. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 12(1), 35-61. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Parliamentary Centre. (2020). Parliamentary accountability and good governance: A parliamentarian’s handbook. https://parlcent.org/wp content/uploads/2020/07/Parliamentary Accountability and Good Governan ce_Handbook_EN.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Principles of Democracy. (n.d.). Majority Rule, Minority Rights. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Ravanilla, N. (2015). Youth participation in local governance in the Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Republic of the Philippines. (2016). Republic Act No. 10742: Sangguniang Kabataan Reform Act of 2015. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Respicio & Co. (2025). Rules on LGU Sessions in the Philippines. https://www.respicio.ph/commentaries/rules-on-lgu-sessions-in-the-philippines [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Robert’s Rules of Order, (n.d.). https://www.ulm.edu/staffsenate/documents/roberts-rules-of- order.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Suarez, S., & Tuble, R. (2025). Assessing core, technical, and leadership competencies of Sangguniang Kabataan officials in Negros Occidental: Key determinants and implications of youth governance. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(6), 382–390. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Supreme Court E-Library. (2023). Revised IRR of Republic Act No. 10742. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Teehankee, J. (2016). The Sangguniang Kabataan reform: Institutionalizing youth participation or elite capture? Philippine Political Science Journal, 37(2), 89105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2010). Youth participation in development: A guide for development practitioners. New York: UNDP. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles