Socio-Demographic Status of Farmers in Five Aspirational Districts of West Bengal: Insights from the Biotech-KISAN Hub Programme

The socio-demographic profile of farmers is a crucial determinant of agricultural development, technology adoption, and livelihood resilience. This study analysed the socio-economic characteristics of 31,742 farmers across five aspirational districts of West Bengal (Birbhum, Nadia, Malda, Dakshin Dinajpur, and Murshidabad) under the DBT-funded Biotech-KISAN Hub Programme. Primary data were collected using a structured survey schedule, and analysed through descriptive statistics and inferential tests (χ², ANOVA). Results revealed feminization of agriculture (63.27% female farmers), dominance of smallholder farming (64.14% ≤2 ha), and prevalence of joint family systems (61.85%). Educational attainment was low, with only 8.79% graduates, and nearly half of households earned ≤₹5,000/month. However, training exposure was relatively high (84.02%), correlating with significantly better incomes (p < 0.01). Youth farmers (<35 years) earned more than older counterparts, while male farmers earned higher than females. The study highlights critical challenges—low mechanization, income vulnerability, limited landholding and opportunities for gender empowerment, youth engagement, smallholder-focused policy, and inclusive agricultural strategies. Findings provide evidence for designing targeted interventions to accelerate socio-economic transformation in aspirational districts.

Socio-demographic profile, Aspirational districts, Smallholder farming

1. Agarwal, B. (2021). How many and which women own land in India? Journal of Peasant Studies, 48(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2021.1887478. Taylor & Francis Online [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ali, J., & Kumar, A. (2023). Demographic, social and economic factors affecting the adoption of green toilets in rural households. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 21(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-023-00881-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Banda, L. J., & Tanganyika, J. (2021). Livestock provide more than food in smallholder production systems of developing countries. Animal Frontiers, 11(2), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfab001. PubMed+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ghosh, A., Chattopadhay, S., & Basu, B. (2022). Multi-scale analysis of rural and urban areas: A case study of Indian districts. ArXiv Preprint arXiv:2209.08472. https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.08472 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Ghosh, A., Gangopadhyay, K., & Basu, B. (2009). Consumer Expenditure Distribution in India, 1983-2007: Evidence of a Long Pareto Tail. ArXiv Preprint arXiv:0912.5420. https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.5420. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Gulati, K., Lybbert, T. J., & Saha, K. (2024). Women's Work and Agricultural Productivity Gaps in India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.344301 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Herrero, M., Thornton, P. K., Gerber, P., & Reid, R. S. (2013). Livestock and global change: Emerging issues for sustainable food systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(52), 20878–20881. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321844111. PNAS [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Jha, S., & Srinivasan, R. (2011). Factors Influencing The Unsatisfactory Functioning Of Rural Development Programmes. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 30(4), 131-138. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-3004061318 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Kulkarni, A., Das, R., Srivastava, R. S., & Chakraborty, T. (2023). Learning and Reasoning Multifaceted and Longitudinal Data for Poverty Estimates and Livelihood Capabilities of Lagged Regions in Rural India. ArXiv Preprint arXiv:2304.13958. https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.13958 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Mahato, J. (2020). A Case Study on: The Health Condition and the Way of Living in the Rural Areas of the Sundarbans South 24 Parganas, West Bengal. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(2), 52-56. https://doi.org/10.5958/2321-5828.2020.00052.2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mahato, J. (2023). Role of Women in Agriculture: Socio-Economic Perspective of The Rural Area of West Bengal, India. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 14(2), 93-96. https://doi.org/10.52711/2321-5828.2023.00019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Meenakshi, J. V., & Ray, R. (2002). Impact of Household Size and Family Composition on Poverty in Rural India. Journal of Policy Modeling, 24(6), 539–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-8938(02)00129-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Panakaje, N. (2025). Measuring socio-economic development of rural households. Cogent Social Sciences, 11(1), 2473766. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2473766 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Paul, P. K., & Mehera, C. (2016). Impacts of Education on Sustainable Development: A Micro Study in Burdwan District of West Bengal, India. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 551–555. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-4-7-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Rathnachandra, S. D. (2021). Chi-square analysis of socio-demographic factors and empowerment of women farmers. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 34(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0279.2021.00001. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Roy, P., Basu, R., & Roy, S. (2022). A Socio Economic Perspective of Intergenerational Educational Mobility: Experience in West Bengal. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 20(4), 903–929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-022-00313-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Roy, P., Ray, S., & Haldar, S. K. (2018). Socio-economic Determinants of Multidimensional Poverty in Rural West Bengal: A Household Level Analysis. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 17(429). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-018-0137-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Srivastava, A. (2023). “More” or “enough”? Rural-urban differences in maximizing utility under market regimes. Journal of Development Economics, 160, 102-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.102118 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Strzelecka, A. (2023). The use of Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector in identifying characteristics of agricultural households. Procedia Computer Science, 207, 1600-1605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.11.228 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Tigga, P. L., & Sinha, A. (2015). Association of Some Socio-Economic and Demographic Factors with Health Status in Rural India. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(1), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.151115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Varshney, D., Joshi, P. K., Kumar, A., Mishra, A. K., & Dubey, S. K. (2022). Examining the transfer of knowledge and training to smallholders in India: Direct and spillover effects of agricultural advisory services in an emerging economy. World Development, 160, 106067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.106067. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Wonde, K. M., Tsehay, A. S., & Lemma, S. E. (2022). Training at farmers training centers and its impact on crop productivity and households' income in Ethiopia: A propensity score matching analysis. Heliyon, 8(7), e09837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09837. PubMed [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar