Evolution of Thinking Skills Research in Educational Psychology: A Bibliometric Analysis

Authors

Nor Syamimi Mohamed Adnan

Universiti Malaysia Perlis (Malaysia)

Mohd Izwan Izhar Haris

Universiti Malaysia Perlis (Malaysia)

Ahmad Hifzurrahman Ridzuan

Universiti Malaysia Perlis (Malaysia)

Mohd Kasturi Nor Abd Aziz

Universiti Malaysia Perlis (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100544

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 6997-7009

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-09

Accepted: 2025-12-16

Published: 2025-12-23

Abstract

Thinking skills have become a central focus in educational psychology as rapid technological progress demands learners who can think critically, creatively, and adaptively in complex environments. Despite growing interest, the evolution of thinking skills research remains fragmented, with limited understanding of its intellectual structure, thematic development, and global research patterns. Addressing this gap, this study conducts a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to map the scientific landscape and identify emerging trajectories in the field. Data were collected using Scopus advanced searching with keywords related to thinking skills, educational psychology, and their intersection, resulting in a final dataset of 690 documents. The dataset was cleaned and analyzed to generate descriptive statistics on publication trends, authorship patterns, country productivity, and document impact. VOSviewer software was then employed to visualize co-authorship networks, keyword co-occurrence, citation structures, and thematic clustering. The results reveal a steady increase in publications over the past decade, with strong contributions from the United States, the United Kingdom, China, and Australia. Keyword co-occurrence analysis identifies prominent themes such as critical thinking, computational thinking, higher-order cognitive skills, instructional design models, digital learning, and bibliometric analysis, forming several distinct clusters that reflect the field’s multidimensional nature. Co-authorship mapping shows growing international collaboration, particularly among Western and Asian academic networks. Overall, this study provides an integrated overview of the intellectual progress in thinking skills research within educational psychology, highlighting the shift toward digital learning environments and interdisciplinary approaches. The findings contribute to a clearer understanding of research directions, methodological evolution, and knowledge gaps, offering valuable insights for scholars seeking to advance research on thinking skills in contemporary educational contexts.

Keywords

Thinking skills, educational psychology, critical thinking

Downloads

References

1. Al-Khoury, A., Hussein, S. A., Abdulwhab, M., Aljuboori, Z. M., Haddad, H., Ali, M. A., Abed, I. A., & Flayyih, H. H. (2022). Intellectual Capital History and Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811615 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alves, J. L., Borges, I. B., & De Nadae, J. (2021). Sustainability in complex projects of civil construction: Bibliometric and bibliographic review. Gestao e Producao, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2020v28e5389 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Appio, F. P., Cesaroni, F., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 623–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1329-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Assyakur, D. S., & Rosa, E. M. (2022). Spiritual Leadership in Healthcare: A Bibliometric Analysis. Jurnal Aisyah : Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.30604/jika.v7i2.914 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bower, V. (2018). RESPONDING TO LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY. In Learning to Teach in the Primary School, Fourth edition (pp. 363–376). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315453736-33 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Brown, A. L. (1997). Transforming Schools into Communities of Thinking and Learning about Serious Matters. American Psychologist, 52(4), 399–413. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0031111064&partnerID=40&md5=a09454588f41f1cf71595e501ca95aa5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. di Stefano, G., Peteraf, M., & Veronay, G. (2010). Dynamic capabilities deconstructed: A bibliographic investigation into the origins, development, and future directions of the research domain. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1187–1204. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. In International Journal of Production Economics (Vol. 162, pp. 101–114). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.003 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39(2), 93–104. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0003102834&partnerID=40&md5= d48cb8fdbefdd0dd4b085c711e01e79f [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Goldie, J. (2012). The formation of professional identity in medical students: Considerations for educators. Medical Teacher, 34(9), e641–e648. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84865386244&partnerID=40&md5=b74fd3fa6155478d82a28c41998be303 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned. Science, 323(5910), 69–71. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-58149270966&partnerID=40&md5=1a32b619decbc95ddb3678fa6b601c1c [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Gu, D., Li, T., Wang, X., Yang, X., & Yu, Z. (2019). Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of electronic health and telemedicine research. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.08.007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Isrokatun, I., Hanifah, N., Abdul, R. Y., Rosmiati, R., & Khoerunnisah, R. (2023). The Development of Android-Based Learning Mobile App to Practice Critical Thinking Skills for Elementary School Students. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 13(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.02.20 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Jonassen, D. H. (2010). Learning to solve problems: A handbook for designing problem-solving learning environments (Vol. 9780203847). https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84917251200&partnerID=40&md5=15b0610f71bf3b6f9de908101cb28961 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kapanadze, D. Ü. (2019). ANALYZING LEARNING OUTCOMES OF NEW TURKISH TEACHING CURRICULUM IN TERMS OF HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS. Milli Egitim, 48(223), 83–111. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85101735540&partnerID=40&md5= bfd4f3f0e0c5cd04da143fa9a3c54f2a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Khiste, G. P., & Paithankar, R. R. (2017). Analysis of Bibliometric term in Scopus. International Research Journal, 01(32), 78–83. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Klinbumrung, K., Surpare, K., & Intarawiset, N. (2025). The Development of a Simulation-Based Learning Model Integrated with Digital Media to Enhance Analytical Thinking Skills for Educational Psychology Subject. Proceedings - 2025 10th International STEM Education Conference, ISTEM-Ed 2025. https://doi.org/10.1109/iSTEM-Ed65612.2025.11129269 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kuhn, D., & Crowell, A. (2011). Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking. Psychological Science, 22(4), 545–552. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79954472454&partnerID=40&md5=b7d3d78e8d1cb98b53bbb62c72886520 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Kuhn, D., & Dean, D. (2004). Metacognition: A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268–273. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-11044224351&partnerID=40&md5=ec5eef4e1e758d100d52a775480a8809 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kuiper, R. A., & Pesut, D. J. (2004). Promoting cognitive and metacognitive reflective reasoning skills in nursing practice: Self-regulated learning theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(4), 381–391. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-1342300769&partnerID=40&md5=abf3e7fced30a0442f18f107632fe2a3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Lebese, M. C., & Mhlongo, S. (2024). An Exploratory Analysis of the Relationship between E-Learning Technologies and the Development of Critical Thinking Skills. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON60312.2024.10578744 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Manalo, E., Blasco, M., Cerezo, R., Dryer, R., Elbasha, T., Hirayama, R., Suarez Fernandez, N., & Tsuda, A. (2026). The development of students’ thinking skills: Perspectives from higher education instructors in Japan, Europe, and Australia. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102028 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Pitorini, D. E. (2025). USING AN E-MODULE BASED ON PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING COMBINED WITH SOCRATIC DIALOGUE TO DEVELOP STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS: A QUALITATIVE STUDY. Journal of Educators Online, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2025.22.1.18 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Román-González, M., Pérez-González, J.-C., & Jiménez Fernández, C. (2017). Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 678–691. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84994491607&partnerID=40&md5=33ed8438cfc18562dfe1dd4c761cf1d1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Tim Dornan, T., Littlewood, S., Margolis, S. A., Scherpbier, A., Spencer, J., & Ypinazar, V. (2006). How can experience in clinical and community settings contribute to early medical education? A BEME systematic review. Medical Teacher, 28(1), 3–18. https://www.scopus.com/inward/ record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-33646081525&partnerID=40&md5=71b311061fcad2eb3a0ea15a19fe3c48 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2007). Bibliometric mapping of the computational intelligence field. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowldege-Based Systems, 15(5), 625–645. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488507004911 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., & Zimmermann, E. (2002). Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology - I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2370.00083 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Wu, Y. C. J., & Wu, T. (2017). A decade of entrepreneurship education in the Asia Pacific for future directions in theory and practice. In Management Decision (Vol. 55, Issue 7, pp. 1333–1350). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-05-2017-0518 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Yadav, M., Mishra, D., Misra, S., Dewasiri, N. J., & Mittal, S. (2024). The impact of experiential learning on revitalizing critical thinking skills for workforce preparation. In Revitalizing Student Skills for Workforce Preparation (pp. 353–369). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3856-8.ch012 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Zang, S., Lin, P., Xia, X., Bai, Y., & Deng, H. (2026). Mediation mechanisms in the hierarchical evolution of high-order thinking skills: A longitudinal study in Chinese science education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101996 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles