ICT and Human Agency in the Fight Against Corruption in Nigeria’s Public Service

Corruption in public service is a global social problem that affects the integrity, development, and stability of institutions and countries. It is an insidious and corrosive plague on societies, undermining development, social justice, democracy and the rule of law, violating human rights, distorting markets, and fostering crimes and threats to harmonious human existence. It compromises the integrity of governance and thrives in conditions of secrecy, poor supervision and accountability, and unregulated discretion in public service. Information and communication technology (ICT) enhances service delivery through efficiency, transparency and stadardisation in data processing that can limit discretion, improve supervision and checkmate corruption. Using critical analysis based on classical deterrence and rational choice theories and library research, this paper examines the gains and limitations of ICT in the fight against corruption in Nigeria. It finds that ICT requires committed human agency to set up appropriate ICT, diligent system operation, and utilisation of the detected irregularities to effectively sanction corrupt practices. ICT has been relatively effective in curbing petty corruption by standardising official operations and enhancing transparency and supervision, but ineffective in tackling grand corruption due to policymakers' lack of commitment to applying effective sanctions to curb it.

Information and communication technology

1. Adam, I., & Fazekas, M. (2021). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Akakpa, O. E., & Akpan, C. S. (2023). Corruption in public administration and national development in Nigeria. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11(6). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=125655 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ani, C. K. C., Izueke, E. M., & Nzekwe, I. F. (2014). Public sector and corruption in Nigeria: An ethical and institutional framework of analysis. Open Journal of Philosophy, 4(3). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bauhr, M., & Grimes, M. (2014). Indignation or resignation: The implications of transparency for societal accountability. Governance, 27(2), 291–320. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Beccaria, C. (1963). On crimes and punishments (H. Paolucci, Trans.). New York: Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bentham, J. (1789). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264–271. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chatham House. (2025). Corruption in Nigeria. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/08/corruptionnigeria (Accessed October 2025). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Davies, T., & Fumega, S. (2014). Mixed incentives: Adopting innovations for transparency, accountability and anti-corruption. Anti-Corruption Resource Centre (U4 Issue No. 4). https://www.u4.no/publications/mixed-incentives-adopting-ict-innovations-for-transparency-accountability-and-anti-corruption [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Dobel, J. P. (1978). The corruption of a state. American Political Science Review, 72(3), 958–973. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 663–671. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Heald, D. (2006). Varieties of transparency. Proceedings of the British Academy, 135, 25–43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan. London: Penguin Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Iyanda, D. O. (2012). Corruption: Definition, theories and concepts. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 2(4), 37–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Kaufmann, D. (2005). Myths and realities of governance and corruption. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/8089/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. Berkeley: University of California Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Kossow, N., & Dykes, V. (2018). Embracing digitalisation: How to use ICT to strengthen anti-corruption. GIZ/BMZ. https://www.giz.de/de/downloads/giz2018-eng_ICT-to-strengthen-Anti-Corruption.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Kuriyan, R., Bailur, S., Gigler, B.-S., & Park, K. (2011). Technologies for transparency and accountability: Implications for ICT policy and implementation. Open Development Technology Alliance. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314236987 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Lambsdorff, J. G. (2001). How corruption in government affects public welfare: A review of theory. Center for Globalization and Europeanization of the Economy. https://www.icgg.org/downloads/contribution08_lambsdorff.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Lindgren, I., Madsen, C. Ø., Hofmann, S., & Melin, U. (2019). Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Government Information Quarterly, 36(3), 427–436. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Locke, J. (1689). Second treatise of government. London: Awnsham Churchill. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Morris, S. D. (1991). Corruption and politics in contemporary Mexico. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ndou, V. (2004). E-government for developing countries: Opportunities and challenges. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 18(1), 1–24. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Nwozor, A., Ake, M., Oluwakemi, O. J., & Tijesunimi, A. R. (2022). Digital transformation and the fight against corruption in Nigeria’s public sector. Perspektif, 11(3), 850–858. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Open Government Partnership (OGP). (2011). Open Government Declaration. http://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/open-government-declaration [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Onwunyi, U. M. (2025). Political corruption and democratic governance in Nigeria: A retrospective analysis of the Buhari administration, 2015–2023. International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 13(5), 106–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2013). Why anticorruption reforms fail: Systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance, 26(3), 449–471. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978). Corruption: A study in political economy. New York: Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Shehu, M. (2025). Speech at a workshop on the role of state executives and legislatures in implementing RMAFC remuneration recommendations, 27 February, Abuja. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Subhajyoti, R. (2012). Reinforcing accountability in public services: An ICT-enabled framework. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(2), 135–148. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Transparency International. Corruption Perception Index: Nigeria. https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/nigeria [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Ugwu, H. N., & Ogbu, O. (2018). ICT and the challenge of anti-corruption fight in Nigeria. Journal of Information Engineering and Application, 8(4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. UNODC. (2004). United Nations handbook on practical anti-corruption measures for prosecutors and investigators. New York: United Nations. https://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/corruption/Handbook.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. UNODC. (2019). Corruption in Nigeria: Patterns and trends. Second survey on corruption as experienced by the population. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. https://www.unodc.org/conig/uploads/documents/Corruption_Survey_2019_Exsum.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Weinstein, J., & Goldstein, J. (2012). The benefits of a big tent: Opening up government in developing countries. UCLA Law Review Discourse, 38, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. World Bank. (2016). World development report 2016: Digital dividends. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. World Bank. (2021). Ethics and corruption in the federal public service: Civil servants' perspectives. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/559381639027580056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. World Bank Group. (2023). Combating corruption. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/governance/brief/combating-corruption [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Communication Strategies among Promoters During MATTA Fair 2025
• An Examination of Colleen Ballinger’s Experience in Social Media: Cancel Culture Chronicle
• Communication Patterns in Conflict Interactions in Premarital Couples Who Are in Abusive Relationships
• Social Media Use on Mental Health Outcomes among Adolescents and Young Adults in Port Harcourt City
• (Un)Successful Error Repairs in L2 Communication