The Impact of Auditor Independence on Fraud Detection in China

In recent years, the issue of corporate fraud has gained increasing attention in both academic research and professional practice, and the role of auditors in fraud prevention and detection has become increasingly critical. This study investigates the impact of auditor independence (comprising independence in fact and independence in appearance) on fraud detection performance in China. Drawing on data from 366 practicing auditors and analyzed using SPSS statistical analysis, the findings reveal that both dimensions significantly enhance auditors’ fraud detection capability, with independence in fact exerting the stronger influence, followed by independence in appearance. These results suggest that independence in fact enables auditors to critically evaluate audit evidence, resist client pressures, and maintain vigilance when confronted with ambiguous or conflicting information. Independence in appearance ensures that external stakeholders perceive auditors as unbiased, reinforcing the deterrent effect of audits and promoting rigorous examination of financial statements. The study also highlights the unique institutional and relational dynamics within the Chinese auditing context, where factors such as ownership concentration, political ties, and regulatory enforcement may influence auditor behavior. Practical implications emphasize the importance of reinforcing professional skepticism, strengthening internal quality-control systems, implementing audit rotation policies, and enhancing transparency to bolster both actual and perceived independence. By linking auditor independence to measurable fraud detection outcomes, this research contributes to improving audit quality and reinforcing public confidence in financial reporting in China.

auditor independence; fraud detection; independence in fact; independence in appearance; audit quality

1. A. Girau, E., Bujang, I., Paulus Jidwin, A., & Said, J. (2022). Corporate governance challenges and opportunities in mitigating corporate fraud in Malaysia. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(2), 620-638. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Adrian, M., Anggraini, N., Azzahra, S. B. R., & Lussianda, E. O. (2024). The Influence Of Independence, Professionalism, Individual Morality And The Effectiveness Of Internal Control On Fraud Detection Husnayain Business Review, 4(1), 62-75. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ali, A., Abd Razak, S., Othman, S. H., Eisa, T. A. E., Al-Dhaqm, A., Nasser, M., Elhassan, T., Elshafie, H., & Saif, A. (2022). Financial fraud detection based on machine learning: a systematic literature review. Applied Sciences, 12(19), 9637. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ardillah, K., & Chandra, R. (2022). Auditor independence, auditor ethics, auditor experience, and due professional care on audit quality. Accounting Profession Journal (APAJI), 4(1), 49-60. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Arfaie, S., Mashayekhi, M. S., Mofatteh, M., Ma, C., Ruan, R., MacLean, M. A., Far, R., Saini, J., Harmsen, I. E., & Duda, T. (2024). ChatGPT and neurosurgical education: a crossroads of innovation and opportunity. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 129, 110815. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Campa, D., & Donnelly, R. (2016). Non-audit services provided to audit clients, independence of mind and independence in appearance: latest evidence from large UK listed companies. Accounting and Business Research, 46(4), 422-449. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Campa, D., Quagli, A., & Ramassa, P. (2025). The roles and interplay of enforcers and auditors in the context of accounting fraud: a review of the accounting literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 47(5), 151-183. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Chatterjee, P., Das, D., & Rawat, D. B. (2024). Digital twin for credit card fraud detection: Opportunities, challenges, and fraud detection advancements. Future Generation Computer Systems, 158, 410-426. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Church, B. K., Jenkins, J. G., McCracken, S. A., Roush, P. B., & Stanley, J. D. (2015). Auditor independence in fact: Research, regulatory, and practice implications drawn from experimental and archival research Accounting Horizons, 29(1), 217-238. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Church, B. K., & Zhang, P. (2011). Nonaudit services and independence in appearance: Decision context matters. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 23(2), 51-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dopuch, N., King, R. R., & Schwartz, R. (2003). Independence in appearance and in fact: An experimental investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(1), 79-114. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Drogalas, G., Pazarskis, M., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Papachristou, A. (2017). The effect of internal audit effectiveness, auditor responsibility and training in fraud detection. Accounting and Management Information Systems, 16(4), 434-454. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Edmond, G., & Martire, K. A. (2019). Just cognition: scientific research on bias and some implications for legal procedure and decision‐making. The modern law review, 82(4), 633-664. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Handoyo, M., Roemkenya, B., & Bayunitri, B. I. (2021). The influence of internal audit and internal control toward fraud prevention. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 3(1), 45-64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Kay, J. (2024). Safeguarding adults: The impact emotional and unconscious factors have on decision making Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust/University of East London]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Lamoreaux, P. T., Mowchan, M., & Zhang, W. (2023). Does Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regulatory enforcement deter low-quality audits? The Accounting Review, 98(3), 335-366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lennox, C. S., & Wu, X. (2022). Mandatory internal control audits, audit adjustments, and financial reporting quality: Evidence from China. The Accounting Review, 97(1), 341-364. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Manap, A., Sasmiyati, R. Y., Edy, N., & Edhie Rachmad, Y. (2023). The role of auditor ethics as moderating variable in relationship between auditor accountability and quality of the audit. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen Teknologi, 7(2), 328-388. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mansouri, A., Pirayesh, R., & Salehi, M. (2009). Audit competence and audit quality: Case in emerging economy. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(2), 17-25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Ndina, F. T., & Maria, E. (2025). Audit Quality During the Pandemic: An Empirical Study Of The Influence of Gender, Time Pressure, And Independence. Jurnal [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Akuntansi Universitas Jember, 23(1), 35-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Noch, M. Y., Ibrahim, M. B. H., Akbar, M. A., Kartim, K., & Sutisman, E. (2022). Independence and competence on audit fraud detection: Role of professional skepticism as moderating. Jurnal Akuntansi, 26(1), 161-175. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Oyedotun, S. A., Oise, G. P., Akilo, B. E., Nwabuokei, O. C., Ejenarhome, P. O., Fole, M., & Onwuzo, C. J. (2025). The Role of Internal Audit in Fraud Detection and Prevention: A Multi-Contextual Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Science Research and Reviews, 2(2), 76-85. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Pinatik, S. (2021). The effect of auditor's emotional intelligence, competence, and independence on audit quality. International Journal of Applied Business and International Management, 6(2), 55-67. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Rashid, M. A., Al-Mamun, A., Roudaki, H., & Yasser, Q. R. (2022). An overview of corporate fraud and its prevention approach. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 16(1), 43-52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Sapiri, M. (2024). A qualitative analysis on the role of auditors in preventing financial crises. Golden Ratio of Auditing Research, 4(2), 89-106. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Sawaya, C., Al Maalouf, N. J., Hanoun, R., & Rakwi, M. (2025). Impact of auditor independence, expertise, and industry experience on financial reporting quality. Asia Pacific Management Review, 30(1), 100357. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sulistyowati, L., & Supriyati, S. (2015). The effect of experience, competence, independence, and professionalism of auditors on fraud detection. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 5(1), 95-110. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. International journal of medical education, 2, 53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Tetteh, L. A., Agyenim-Boateng, C., & Simpson, S. N. Y. (2023). Institutional pressures and strategic response to auditing implementation of sustainable development goals: the role of public sector auditors. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 24(2), 403-423. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. West, J., & Bhattacharya, M. (2016). Intelligent financial fraud detection: a comprehensive review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Computers & security, 57, 47-66. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Windsor, C., & Warming-Rasmussen, B. (2009). The rise of regulatory capitalism and the decline of auditor independence: A critical and experimental examination of auditors’ conflicts of interests. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(2), 267-288. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Wu, L., & Xiao, J. Z. (2021). The value of auditing, audit independence, and audit pricing: a review of empirical evidence from China. Accounting and Business Research, 51(6-7), 585-621. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Xanthopoulou, A., Skordoulis, M., Kalantonis, P., & Arsenos, P. (2024). Integrating corporate governance and forensic accounting: A sustainable corporate strategy against fraud. Journal of Governance and Regulation/Volume, 13(2), 32-41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Yahaya, A., & Onyabe, J. (2022). Do audit fee and auditor independence influence audit quality. Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, 14(1), 66-80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Zeng, H., Li, X., Zhou, Q., & Wang, L. (2022). Local government environmental regulatory pressures and corporate environmental strategies: Evidence from natural resource accountability audits in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3060-3082. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Zhu, X. (2012). Understanding China's growth: Past, present, and future. Journal of economic perspectives, 26(4), 103-124. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Zi, M. (2024). Review of the Listing Reform under the Registration Reform of the Securities Law in China and a Proposal for a Future Reform. Law Sci., 3, 681. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria