Therapeutic Environment as Silent Therapy in Supporting the Recovery Process at the Recovery Centre in Malaysia

The pervasive reliance on pharmacological interventions and structured group therapies in Malaysian recovery centres frequently overlooks a fundamental dimension of holistic healing. Patients often reside in sterile, institutional spaces, creating a profound disjuncture between their internal need for solace and the external environment's unresponsiveness; this oversight, one might argue, severely impedes genuine, sustained recovery efforts. Existing scholarship generally treats therapeutic environments as a mere backdrop for clinical practice, seldom conceptualising the physical and social surroundings themselves as an active, potent therapeutic agent. This conceptual paper undertakes a critical analysis of extant literature, examining how carefully curated physical and relational surroundings might function as a discernible form of silent therapy. The paper argues that a thoughtfully designed environment actively promotes self-regulation, offering clients a sense of autonomy often profoundly eroded during the addiction cycle. Furthermore, it posits that specific environmental elements foster non-verbal communication and support deep emotional processing, often bypassing common therapeutic resistances inherent in verbal modalities. Finally, the analysis suggests such settings can subtly, yet powerfully, reinforce a client's emergent identity beyond their addiction, rather than simply containing or managing their symptoms. This re-framing urges policy makers and facility designers alike to fundamentally reconsider recovery centres as dynamic, restorative ecosystems, capable of profound influence.

Therapeutic environment, Silent therapy

1. Abdullah, F., & Hamzah, A. (2014). Cultural identity and architectural forms: Malaysian perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 268-278. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Chok, N. P., & Othman, Z. (2019). The influence of architectural design on users' psychological well-being in mental health institutions. Malaysian Journal of Real Estate, 14(2), 33-46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cohen, S., & Friel, S. N. (2011). Creating supportive environments for people with mental health issues: A review of the literature. Health & Social Care in the Community, 19(2), 113-122. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Focht, A. J., & Rhee, K. A. (2012). Environmental design in psychiatric facilities. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 18(4), 284-290. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Heerwagen, J. H., & Orians, G. H. (1993). Humans, habitats, and aesthetics. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 138-175). Island Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Keesler, J. M., & Witkin, S. L. (2007). Peer support and social connectedness in addiction recovery. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 7(1-2), 173-191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Marcus, C. C., & Barnes, M. (1999). Healing gardens: Therapeutic benefits and design recommendations. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Rodin, J. (1986). Aging and health: Effects of the sense of control. Science, 233(4770), 1271-1276. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Sahimi, N., & Othman, R. (2020). The role of natural environment in rehabilitation centers: A case study of drug addiction rehabilitation in Malaysia. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 5(15), 159-166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Scull, A. T. (1977). The most solitary of afflictions: Madness and society in Britain, 1700-1900. Yale University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224(4647), 420-421. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ulrich, R. S., Zimring, C., Joseph, A., Quan, X., & Choudhary, R. (2008). The role of the physical environment in the hospital of the 21st century: A once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Concord, CA: The Center for Health Design. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Verderber, S., & Moore, R. J. (2017). Innovations in hospice architecture: A new typological model. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Wong, P. C. (2022). Rethinking recovery: A qualitative study of former drug users' experiences in Malaysian rehabilitation centres. Journal of Public Health in Developing Countries, 8(1), 1-10. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being