Political Oppression and its Role in the Spread of Superstitions in Islamic Societies

The pervasive grip of political coercion, an insidious force, seems to cultivate a pervasive culture of banality within Islamic societies. This phenomenon, often overlooked in its systemic nature, directly corrodes intellectual discourse and suffocates the critical faculties essential for communal flourishing, leading to a profound moral and social malaise that permeates public life. Regrettably, prior academic explorations seldom draw a direct causal line between systematic state repression and the calculated propagation of superficiality, nor do they offer a coherent Islamic da'wah framework designed to effectively address this deeply rooted societal pathology. This conceptual inquiry, based entirely on an exhaustive library research paradigm, critically examines these obscured connections. We contend that political coercion actively fosters environments where intellectual triviality becomes a societal coping mechanism, an escape from brutal realities; indeed, this "culture of banality" manifests distinctly in public discourse and consumerist media habits, systematically eroding engagement; and, most crucially, any truly effective Islamic da'wah strategy must transcend simplistic moral injunctions, confronting instead the foundational political structures that engender both oppression and intellectual decay. Reclaiming a vibrant intellectual tradition and genuine Islamic thought, one might argue, hinges entirely upon a direct and uncompromising confrontation with both state repression and the manufactured triviality it so cynically promotes.

Political Coercion, Cultural Trivialisation, Islamic Discourse

1. Arendt, H. (1963). *Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil*. Viking Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Altman, D. (2017). Authoritarianism and education: The politics of schooling in Morocco. *The Journal of North African Studies, 22*(1), 1-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Al-Busaidi, S., & Al-Hinai, M. (2020). Social media and youth in Oman: Navigating the digital landscape. *Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 13*(1), 77-94. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Al-Qaradawi, Y. (1990). *The priorities of the Islamic movement in the coming phase*. Islamic Foundation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Bayat, A. (2010). *Life as politics: How ordinary people change the Middle East*. Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Davenport, C. (2007). State repression and political order. *Annual Review of Political Science, 10*, 1-21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Esposito, J. L., & Mogahed, D. (2007). *Who speaks for Islam?: What a billion Muslims really think*. Gallup Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Fadel, M. (2012). The ‘Ulama, the state, and the legitimation of authoritarianism: An Islamic perspective. *Journal of Law and Religion, 27*(2), 245-283. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hafez, K. (2014). *The Middle East and political communication*. University of Illinois Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002). *Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments* (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ibn Khaldūn. (1967). *The Muqaddimah: An introduction to history* (F. Rosenthal, Trans.). Princeton University Press. (Original work, 1377). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Lust-Okar, E. (2006). Elections under authoritarianism: Preliminary lessons from Jordan. *Democratization, 13*(3), 456-470. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Postman, N. (1985). *Amusing ourselves to death: Public discourse in the age of show business*. Viking. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ramadan, T. (2004). *Western Muslims and the future of Islam*. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Siddiqui, A. (2017). The internet and Islamic education: New challenges for the 'ulama in Bangladesh. *Contemporary Islam, 11*(2), 319–335. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Way, L. A. (2005). The dynamics of authoritarianism and international linkage. *Comparative Politics, 37*(2), 141-162. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Data Integration in Malaysian Syariah Courts: A Study of Challenges and Solutions
• The Concept of Family Well-Being from the Perspectives of Islam, Western Thought and Malaysia Madani
• Leveraging AI Tools for Islamic Scholarship: Podcast and eBook Innovations in Teaching the Sunni Intellectual Tradition
• Cryptocurrency and Shariah: Analyzing the Implications of Islamic Jurisprudence on Bitcoin and its Ethical Framework
• Islamic Credit Card and its Value-Based Proposition: A Perspective from Maqasid Al-Shariah