Assessment of Cost, Margin and Post-Harvest Losses of Cassava Value Chain in Kogi State, Nigeria

Authors

Elega, J. O.

Department of Agricultural Economics and Farm Management, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State (Nigeria)

Ayodele, G. C.

Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Abuja, Abuja (Nigeria)

Samuel S.

Department of Agricultural Economics and Farm Management, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Niger State (Nigeria)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91100591

Subject Category: Agriculture

Volume/Issue: 9/11 | Page No: 7606-7622

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-06

Accepted: 2025-12-12

Published: 2025-12-25

Abstract

This study assessed the cost structure, profitability and determinants of post-harvest losses (PHL) across cassava value chain actors in Kogi State, Nigeria. Data were obtained from 194 respondents comprising farmers (78), processors (58), traders (39) and transporters (19). Descriptive statistics, enterprise budgeting, Kendall’s coefficient and a multinomial logit model were used to analyze the data in line with the stated objectives. Results showed that medium PHL levels (11–20%) dominated at 42.3%, while 27.3% of actors experienced high losses exceeding 20%. Delayed processing was the most reported cause of PHL (64.4%), followed by poor storage (49.5%) and mechanical damage (33.5%). Cost and profitability analysis indicated that farmers earned a net income of ₦240,100 with a benefit–cost ratio (BCR) of 1.48, while processors recorded ₦105,500 (BCR=1.46). Traders realized a modest net income of ₦16,000 (BCR=1.20), whereas transporters operated at a loss (–₦23,200, BCR=0.70) due to high operational and maintenance costs. The multinomial logit results showed that improved varieties significantly reduced the likelihood of high PHL (–0.981, p<0.01), while mechanized handling (–0.644, p < 0.05) and access to extension (–0.793, p<0.01) also had strong mitigating effects. Conversely, storage duration (0.487, p < 0.01), transport cost (0.00038, p<0.01) and distance to market (0.114, p<0.05) significantly increased loss severity. Kendall’s coefficient (W) (0.61, p<0.01) confirmed strong agreement on constraint ranking, with transportation cost, poor road network and high input prices most severe. The study therefore concludes that targeted investments in rural infrastructure, mechanization, improved storage systems and strengthened extension services are critical to reducing PHL and enhancing cassava value chain competitiveness in Kogi State, Nigeria.

Keywords

Cassava, Post-harvest, Profitability, Multinomial logit

Downloads

References

1. Adejumo, B.A., & Raji, A.O. (2020). Determinants of adoption of improved cassava processing technologies among small-scale processors in Southwest Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 24(1), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ayanwanwu, V.O., Edeh, H.O., & Osondu, C.K. (2022). Socio-economic assessment of cassava value chain participants in Southeast Nigeria. International Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, 14(2), 112–125. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Chikezie, N.P., Nwachukwu, I.N., & Okoro, C.C. (2023). Transportation challenges and postharvest losses in root and tuber crops in rural Nigeria. Journal of Rural Infrastructure Development, 6(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Federal Ministry of Mines and Steel. (2023). Environmental and geographic profile of Kogi State. Abuja: FMSM. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2021). The state of agricultural commodity markets in Africa: Resilience in food supply chains. FAO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. National Bureau of Statistics. (2022). National Agricultural Sample Survey (NASS). Abuja: NBS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. National Population Commission. (2006). Population and housing census report. Abuja: NPC. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Nigerian Meteorological Agency. (2020). Annual climate review report. Abuja: NIMET. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Ogisi, O.D., Adepoju, A.O., & Ehinomen, C. (2023). Participation and performance of small-scale cassava processors in Nigeria: Evidence from Kogi and Benue States. African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 18(3), 210–225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Sahel Capital. (2021). Enhancing Nigeria’s cassava value chain competitiveness: Opportunities for small and medium enterprises. Sahel Consulting Agriculture and Nutrition Limited. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Tijani, A.A., Yusuf, T.M., & Ibrahim, M.T. (2023). Market participation and operational constraints among cassava traders in North Central Nigeria. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 18(2), 67–80. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Ume, S.I., Eze, C.C., & Nwachukwu, I.N. (2022). Socio-economic determinants of cassava marketing channel choices among rural households in Nigeria. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 14(4), 181–191. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Vutula, S. (2024). Youth involvement and structural change in the cassava value chain in West Africa. Development Policy Review, 42(1), e12615. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles