A Preliminary Study on Critical Thinking Skills and Reading for Learning Level of Secondary School L2 Learners

This preliminary qualitative study examines the development of critical thinking skills and the level of reading for learning among secondary school L2 learners. The study involved two 15-year-old high-proficiency L2 learners from a Malaysian secondary school, using three qualitative instruments: think-aloud protocols, reflective journal writing, and structured interviews. Data were analysed according to the five stages of Reading for Learning – decoding, understanding, comparing, evaluating, and revising ideas. The participants read a narrative text selected from the KSSM Form 3 Close-Up B1 Students Book by Healan and Gormley (2018), entitled Survival in the Andes. Findings showed that both learners demonstrated critical engagement, particularly in making judgments and drawing connections with prior knowledge. However, the highest cognitive stage, revising one’s ideas, was not observed during think-aloud sessions but emerged in reflective journals and interviews, indicating a time-delayed cognitive transformation that may be due to the amount of time participants spent doing independent research. The study highlights the multidimensional nature of critical thinking in L2 reading and underscores the importance of using multimodal, reflective approaches to foster deeper learning and cognitive development

critical thinking, reading for learning, secondary school, L2 learners

1. Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From Data to Wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16, 3-9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed.), Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bloom, B. S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956) The Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook I: The Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bransford, J. D. (1984). Schema Activation and Schema Acquisition: Comments on Richard C. Anderson’s remarks. In R. C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & R. J. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586613 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Davies, F., & Greene, T. (1984). Reading for learning in the sciences. Oliver & Boyd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Dewey, J. (2022). How We Think. Z & L Barnes Publishing. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Kurland, D. J. (2000). How the Language Really Works: The Fundamentals of Critical Reading and Effective Writing. Critical reading V. critical thinking. Retrieved January 8, 2023, http://www.criticalreading.com/critical_reading_thinking.htm [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Lunzer, E. A., & Gardner, K. (1979). The effective use of reading. Heinemann Educational Books [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lunzer, E., Gardner, K., Davies, F., & Greene, T. (1984). Learning from the written word. Nottingham, England: Schools Council Project. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). Praise for the Second Edition of The New Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Corwin Press, i–ii. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Rowley, J. (2007). The Wisdom Hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506070706 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an Interactive Model of Reading. In Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (pp. 722-750). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Thorndike, E. L. (1917). Reading as reasoning: A study of mistakes in paragraph reading. Warwick & York Inc. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar