Factors Causing Quiet Quitting in Generation Z: A Systematic Review

The phenomenon of quiet quitting reflects the behavior of workers who only perform tasks according to the job description without emotional involvement or commitment to the organization. Although often considered a symptom of disengagement, this phenomenon appears to be increasingly common among Generation Z of the young workforce group that is growing up in the digital age and the crisis of the meaning of work. Along with the increasing prevalence of anxiety, stress, and emotional exhaustion in this generation, the term Anxious Generation emerged to describe their psychological state. This article is a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) that aims to analyze the relationship between quiet quitting, work-life balance, and workload to the emergence of anxiety in Generation Z in the world of work. The search was conducted on the Publish Perish, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and 2020–2025 databases. Of the 45 articles identified, 18 met the inclusion criteria and were the thematically analyzed. The results show that quiet quitting can double as a coping mechanism against stress and work-life imbalance, but also as an indicator of disengagement that exacerbates work anxiety. Excessive workload, high organizational expectations, and weak social support reinforce this effect. Thus, quiet quitting among Generation Z cannot be understood solely as a motivational phenomenon, but rather as a mirror of the psychosocial dynamics of the generation that is prone to anxiety and uncertainty. This study emphasizes the importance of organizational interventions that balance the demands of work with the psychological well-being of the younger generation.

Quiet Quitting, Generation Z, Anxiety, Work-Life Balance, Workload, Anxious Generation

1. Alimmah, B. B., Adawiyah, W. R., & Wulandari, S. Z. (2023). Quiet quitting phenomenon among gen Z: the influence of toxic workplace environment on quiet quitting moderated by organizational commitment. Proceeding of International Conference Sustainable Competitive Advantage, 4(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bahiroh, E., Aritonang, F. L. T., & Firdaus, M. D. (2025). Analisis Employee Engagement Di Tengah Fenomena Quiet Quitting Pada Generasi Z. Musytari: Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi, Dan Ekonomi, 24(12), 1811–1820. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands‐Resources model: state of the art. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1181/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Deloitte. (2022, April). The Deloitte Global 2022 Gen Z and Millennial Survey. Deloitte. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. DP, S. N., Sujibto, B. J., & Puspitasari, I. (2024). Quiet Quitting sebagai Strategi Resistensi: Pengalaman Pekerja Fresh Graduate di Yogyakarta. Sosiologi USK : Media Pemikiran & Aplikasi, 18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dunan, H., & Tegar, R. S. (2025). Pengaruh Work-Life Balance Dan Stes Kerja Terhadapa Kecenderungan Quiet Quitting Pada PT Gumarang Jaya Bersama Bandar Lampung. Inovasi Pembangunan: Jurnal Kelitbangan, 13(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Ellera, L., Jamali, D. R., & Caldwell, C. (2023). “Quiet Quitting” and “Quiet Thriving” – Flourishing in the Modern Organization. The Journal of Values-Based Leadership, 16(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. https://doi.org/10.22543/1848-0733.1477 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Haidt, J. (2024). The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness. Penguin Publishing Group. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=I03HEAAAQBAJ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (2011). The Motivation to Work. Transaction Publishers. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=5ohNXlUWeXcC [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Hobfoll, S. E. (1889). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Iloponu, A., Yantu, I., & Tantawi, R. (2025). Peran Mediasi Emotional Salary Pada Pengaruh Quiet Quitting dan Digital Fatigue terhadap Retensi Karyawan Gen Z (Studi Pada Industri Sektor Jasa Perbankan di Kota Gorontalo). Economics and Digital Business Review, 6(2), 1033–1045. https://ojs.stieamkop.ac.id/index.php/ecotal/article/view/2496 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. 2. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Manullang, Y., Ramadhan, Y., Purwaningrum, E., Azizah, P., Fitriana, H., & Pinanda, D. (2025). Penyusunan Skala Quiet Quitting pada Karyawan Gen Z di Indonesia. MARAS : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 3, 984–996. https://doi.org/10.60126/maras.v3i3.1142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Margaretha, C., & Panggabean, H. (2025). The Impact of Job Satisfaction on Quiet Quitting with Organizational Justice as a Mediator among Generation Z Employees. Psikologika: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Psikologi, 30(2), 303–314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://doi.org/10.20885/psikologika.vol30.iss2.art8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. McKinsey Institute. (2023). Addressing the unprecedented behavioral-health challenges facing Generation Z. McKinsey. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Nabilla, R. A., Pohan, V. G. R., & Barus, R. E. (2025). Unpacking Tendency of Quiet Quitting in the Generation Z: A Descriptive Analysis. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Narendra, Z. A., & A’yuninnisa, R. N. (2025). Emotional Well-Being Matters Most: How Job Flourishing Reduces Quiet Quitting Among Generation Z In Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Perilaku, 9(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.25077/jip.9.1.1-18.2025 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Nenova, M. (2025). The anxious generation. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0075417X.2025.2558776 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Ochis, K. (2024). Generation Z and “Quiet Quitting”: Rethinking onboarding in an era of employee disengagement. Multidisciplinary Business Review, 17(1), 83–97. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. https://doi.org/10.35692/07183992.17.1.7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Prakasa, M., Adinegara, I., Komalasari, Y., & Trimurti, C. (2025). Quite Quitting Decision Making Based on Work-Life Balance Mediated by Burnout in Generation Z at Intercontinental Hotel Bali? [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. The Es Economics and Entrepreneurship, 3. https://doi.org/10.58812/esee.v3i03.521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Prakasa, M. B., Joko Adinegara, I. G. N., Komalasari, Y., & Trimurti, C. P. (2025). Quite Quitting Decision Making Based on Work-Life Balance Mediated by Burnout in Generation Z at Intercontinental Hotel Bali? The Es Economics and Entrepreneurship, 3(03). https://doi.org/10.58812/esee.v3i03.521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Pronin, S. (2025). The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Epidemic of Mental Illness By Jonathan Haidt Penguin. 2025. £10.99 (pb). 400 pp. ISBN [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. 9781802063271. BJPsych Bulletin, 1–1. https://doi.org/10.1182/bjb.2025.16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Putri, L. S., Sunjaya, N. A., Lee, S. A., Ningtyas, D. Z., & Chandhika, J. (2025). Peran Komunikasi Internal Dalam Mengurangi Fenomena Quiet Quitting Pada Generasi Z Di Tempat Kerja: The Role of Internal Communication in Reducing the Phenomenon of Quiet Quitting Among Generation Z in the Workplace. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(3), 6446–6458. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Rahayu, I., Azzahra, F., Prameswari, D., Ramadhani, D. P., & Trisiana, A. E. A. (2025). Gen Z In [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. The Workplace : Quiet Quitting Or BurnOut? Book Of Abstract An Nuur International Conference On Health, Business, Education, Science And Technology, 1(01), 4. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Rizqiansyah, M. Z. A. (2017). Hubungan Antara Beban Kerja Fisik Dan Beban Kerja Mental Berbasis Ergonomi Terhadap Tingkat Kejenuhan Kerja Pada Karyawan PT Jasa Marga (Persero) Tbk Cabang Surabaya Gempol. Jurnal Sains Psikologi, 6(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Satriawan, B., Hidayat, M., & Utami, I. (2025c). Gen Z at Work: The Roles of Quiet Quitting, Career Support, and Engagement in Shaping Performance. Almana : Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 9(2), 337–344. https://doi.org/10.36555/almana.v9i2.2883 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Suparto Putri, L., Sunjaya, N. A., Lee, S. A., Ningtyas, D. Z., & Chandhika, J. (2025). Peran Komunikasi Internal Dalam Mengurangi Fenomena Quiet Quitting Pada Generasi Z Di Tempat Kerja. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 5(3), 6446–6458. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i3.18356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Taufik, N., Rosyadi, A., & Aliyuddin, M. (2024). Why millennials and gen Z are silently leaving their jobs? Unraveling the ‘quiet quitting’ trend. Asian Management and Business Review, 276–292. https://doi.org/10.20885/AMBR.vol4.iss2.art7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Widiari, P. A. O. (2025). Quite Qutting di Kalangan Generasi Z: Literature Review Manajerial. MUDABBIR Journal Research and Education Studies, 5(2), 2154–2165. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. Xueyun, Z., Al Mamun, A., Masukujjaman, M., Rahman, M. K., Gao, J., & Yang, Q. (2023). Modelling the significance of organizational conditions on quiet quitting intention among Gen Z workforce in an emerging economy. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 15438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42591-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• A Comparative Study of Adjustment Level, Parental Income and Academic Achievement of Adolescent Girls
• Increase in STIs among Adolescents in Masvingo District
• A Correlation between SDG 4 (Quality Education) and Emotional Disposition of Teacher Educators in Hyderabad District
• Ear Piercing Behaviour and Self-Esteem among Male University Students in Nigeria
• A Study of Religiosity and Psychological Well-Being