Learner Autonomy and Attitudes toward Philippine English: Predictors of Grammar Performance among College ESL Students

Persistent concerns about Filipino students’ grammatical accuracy remain evident despite the Philippines’ long-standing exposure to English and its consistently high ranking in global proficiency indexes, which underscores the need to identify factors that shape grammar performance among tertiary learners. This study examined how learner autonomy and attitudes toward Philippine English relate to and predict the grammar performance of ESL students enrolled in a local college in Misamis Oriental. Using a descriptive–correlational predictive design and employing validated autonomy and attitude scales alongside a grammar test patterned after the Oxford Quick Placement Test, the study found that students demonstrated high autonomy and positive attitudes across all dimensions, yet their grammar performance remained at the B1 Intermediate level. Correlation results revealed that only Decision Making in Learning was significantly associated with grammar performance, and regression analysis confirmed it as the sole significant predictor, indicating that strategic learning behaviors exert greater influence on grammatical accuracy than general autonomy or attitudinal orientations. The findings emphasize the need to strengthen explicit grammar instruction and promote strategic decision-making skills within the local college context, where learners balance academic demands with varied linguistic backgrounds. These results provide important insights for curriculum design, teacher training, and future research on cognitive and sociolinguistic influences on ESL grammar development.

Learner Autonomy, Philippine English, Grammar Performance

1. Alsulami, A. (2023). Attitudes toward English varieties and their relationship to motivation among Saudi EFL students. English Language Teaching, 16(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n2p1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alderson, J. C. (2007). The CEFR and the need for more research. The Modern Language Journal, 91(4), 659–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00627.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bai, B., & Wang, J. (2020). The role of autonomy support in grammar learning among EFL learners. System, 91, 102263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102263 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bautista, M. L. S., & Bolton, K. (2008). Philippine English: Linguistic and literary perspectives. Hong Kong University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cabugsa, C. (2022). Learner autonomy and performance in self-access learning contexts [Unpublished study]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cambridge Assessment English. (n.d.). Oxford Quick Placement Test. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Cruz, L. (2024). Attitudes Toward Philippine English Questionnaire [Measurement instrument]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Fang, F. (2019). Repositioning China English in ELT: Insights from learners’ attitudes. ELT Journal, 73(3), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Fulcher, G. (2010). Practical language testing. Hodder Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Green, A. (2014). Exploring language assessment and testing: Language in action. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Hernandez, H. P. (2020). Attitudes of Filipino graduate students toward teaching educated Philippine English. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 20(1), 36–48. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). Is the Common European Framework of Reference a valid framework for second language proficiency? Applied Linguistics, 33(4), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Iñigo, J. (2018). Filipino students’ beliefs about autonomy and teacher dependence [Unpublished study]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world (pp. 11–30). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Lai, Y., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Learning strategies in mobile-assisted autonomous language learning: A scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 5671–5692. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. McKenzie, R. M., & Gilmore, A. (2017). The influence of accent on employability in the United Kingdom. Applied Linguistics, 38(5), 613–637. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv075 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Oxford University Press. (2019). Oxford placement test. https://www.oxfordenglishtesting.com [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Prejoles, M. J. P., Abellana, M., & Arreglo, M. (2025). Shifting tides: ESL learners’ attitude towards Philippine English. Journal of English Language Studies. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Raza, M., Khan, M., & Ali, R. (2020). Self-regulated learning as a predictor of academic achievement among university students. Journal of Educational Research, 23(2), 89–105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Soliman, C. (2024). Learner Autonomy Questionnaire [Measurement instrument]. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Tamano, J. (2023). The 5R Model of Language Learner Autonomy. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(1), 45–58. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Teng, L., & Zhang, L. J. (2018). Effects of self-regulated learning strategies on second language writing performance. Applied Linguistics Review, 9(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2016-1065 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Umayam, A. R., Icamen, T. B., Merano, C. C., & Adnan, A. (2022). Philippine English and the attitudes and perceptions of college students. International Journal of Advanced Language and Educational Linguistics, 3(1), 1–16*. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369384323 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Viberg, O., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2021). Fostering learners’ self-regulation and collaboration skills for mobile-assisted language learning beyond the classroom. arXiv. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Enhancing English Vocabulary Skills for Grade 9 Students ‘Using Deal or No Deal’ Game
• Enhancing Grade 8 English Engagement: Fill My Bag Strategy
• Enhancing Pre-Service Teachers’ Communication Competence: An Input to a Communication Skills Development Module
• Lower Secondary School Students' Attitude toward Reading in English
• Code-Switching in the English Classroom: Impact on Grade 11 General Academic Strand (Gas) Students' English Comprehension