Building and Applying the Reckless Thinking Scale among Students of the Faculties of Education for Humanities and Pure Sciences
Authors
Dr. Mohammed Hashim Taha Sulaiman Al-Ogaidi
University of Mosul (Mosul)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200015
Subject Category: Educational Technology
Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 164-173
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-11
Accepted: 2025-12-18
Published: 2025-12-30
Abstract
The research aimed to design, construct, and apply the Reckless Thinking Scale among students of the Faculties of Education for Humanities and Pure Sciences.
The sample consisted of (400) male and female students, selected by a stratified random method with equal distribution, from all academic stages of the Faculties of Education for Humanities and Pure Sciences, and to measure healthy thinking, a scale was built based on theoretical bridging (synthesis method), which consisted of (24) items.
Keywords
A lot of researchers have been trying to figure out why kids make bad choices for a long time
Downloads
References
1. AL-Ogaidi, Muhammad Hashem Taha sulaiman (2020) Fast-Slow Thinking and its Relationship with Preventive Thinking and Circular Thinking among Students at the University of Mosul. (Unpublished Master's Thesis), Department of Educational and Psychological Sciences, Faculty of Education for Humanities, University of Mosul, Iraq. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Brough, Paula (2019) Advanced Research Methods for Applied Psychology Design, Analysis and Reporting. First published by Routledge, 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, United States of America. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Habib, Safaa Tarek and Sadiq Abdel Nour Aziz (2018) Building Psychological Scales According to the Paragraph Response Theory Using the Generalized Scouting Model. First Edition, Dar Al-Manhayah for Publishing and Distribution, Amman, Jordan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Johnson, R., & Lee, S. (2019). Impulsivity and academic performance in higher education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(3), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000123 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. MacBride, Dawn M. (2018) the Process of Statistical Analysis in Psychology. SAGE Publications Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard 55, City Road London, EC1Y 1SP, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Markus, Keith A and Denny Borsboom (2013) Frontiers of Test Validity Theory Measurement, Causation, and Meaning. Published by Routledge, 711 Third Avenue, NY 10017, New York, United States of America. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Martinez, P., Clark, L., & Nguyen, T. (2021). Time management and mental health in university students. Journal of College Student Development, 62(4), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2021.0034 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Mertens, Donna M. (2015) Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. Fourth Edition, SAGE Publications Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard 55 City Road London, EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Mischel, W., Ebbesen, E. B., & Raskoff Zeiss, A. (1972). Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, (2), 204–218. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Privitera, Gregory J. (2019) Essential Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Second Edition, SAGE Publications Ltd, one Oliver’s Yard 55 City Road London, EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Rabie, Mashaan Hadi and Khatam Ismail Ahmed (2008) Measurement and Evaluation in Education. Dar Zahran, Amman, Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Shehata, Samia Samir (2012) Psychometrics. First Edition, Itrak Printing, Publishing and Distribution, Cairo, Egypt. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Smith, J. (2020). Reckless cognition: Understanding impulsive behaviors. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S. (2002). Psychological heterogeneity in ADHD: A dual pathway model of behaviour and cognition. Behavioural Brain Research, 130, (1–2), 29–36. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28(1), 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Verma J. P. (2019) Statistics and Research Methods in Psychology with Excel. Published by the registered company Springer Ltd, the registered company, 152 Beach Road, Gateway East, Singapore. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The five-factor model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, (4), 669–689. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of Health Crisis on the Evolution of the Use of Scientific Knowledge Sharing Tools by Academics: A Comparative Study Within the Faculty of Sciences of Tunis
- Availability and Accessibility of Computers and ICT Resources in Teaching and Learning Chemistry in Secondary Schools in Nyamira County, Kenya