Diversifying Zambia's Energy Mix: A Qualitativee Analysis of Zesco's Transition from Hydrodependence

Authors

Michael Musheba Ndopu

Graduate School of Business, University of Zambia (Zambia)

Dr. Nicholas Odongo

Graduate School of Business, University of Zambia (Zambia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200028

Subject Category: Business

Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 303-323

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-11

Accepted: 2025-12-19

Published: 2025-12-31

Abstract

Zambia’s electricity sector is predominantly reliant on hydropower, generating 85% of its energy from hydroelectric sources. However, climate change-induced droughts and water shortages at major reservoirs, such as Kariba Dam, exposed the country to severe energy instability. Consequently, energy diversification has become an urgent policy objective for ZESCO and the Zambian government. This study examined ZESCO’s transition from hydro-dependence to a diversified energy mix by assessing consumer perceptions, stakeholder perspectives, and policy challenges affecting renewable energy adoption. A qualitative case study approach was employed, combining semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders and document analysis of energy policies, regulatory frameworks, and investment reports. The study sample included ZESCO officials, government policymakers, energy experts, and electricity consumers, providing a multi-dimensional understanding of Zambia’s energy diversification landscape. Data were analyzed through thematic analysis, which identified core themes related to energy security, financial constraints, policy barriers, and public willingness to support diversification efforts. Results revealed that 65% of consumers rated electricity supply as unreliable, with daily outages lasting between 8 and 16 hours for most respondents. Public awareness of ZESCO’s diversification initiatives was low, with 50% only somewhat informed about renewable projects. Solar and wind energy emerged as preferred alternatives, with 40% supporting solar expansion. Financial constraints (25%) and regulatory barriers (25%) were the primary obstacles. Despite these barriers, 50% of consumers expressed willingness to pay higher tariffs for improved reliability. The study recommended policy enhancements, strategic investments in solar and wind, and improved consumer engagement to support Zambia’s transition toward a resilient and diversified energy future.

Keywords

Energy diversification, electricity reliability, hydropower dependence, renewable energy, energy security

Downloads

References

1. Accenture (2022). Consumer Priorities in Digital Financial Transactions. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bank of Zambia (2024). Annual Report on Digital Financial Services. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bank of Zambia (2024). National payment system: Vision and strategy 2023–2027. Lusaka: Bank of Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Broadband Commission (2020). The State of Broadband 2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Capgemini (2023). Tailoring Financial Products for Diverse Income Segments. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. CGAP (2019). Financial Inclusion and the Role of Digital Finance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Deloitte (2023). Enhancing Security in Digital Financial Services. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S., & Hess, J. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring Financial Inclusion and Opportunities. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Finscope Zambia (2024). Financial inclusion survey report. Lusaka: Finscope Zambia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Finextra (2023). Innovation in Digital Financial Services. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Forrester (2023). Digital Innovation and Customer Engagement in Banking. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gartner (2023). Importance of User Experience in Digital Banking. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. GSMA (2020). Mobile Money: A Look at the Latest Trends and Developments. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. GSMA (2023). Mobile Money and Financial Inclusion in Sub-Saharan Africa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. GSMA (2023). State of the Industry Report on Mobile Money. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. GSMA (2023). The mobile economy Sub-Saharan Africa 2023. London: GSMA Intelligence. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. GSMA Intelligence (2024). Kenya’s M-Pesa ecosystem: A global benchmark for digital financial inclusion. London: GSMA. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. IBM (2023). Strengthening Security Protocols in Digital Finance. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. ITU (2022). Global ICT Development Index. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. JD Power (2023). Enhancing Customer Loyalty through Personalized Support. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. KPMG (2022). Drivers of Digital Financial Service Adoption. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bisson, P., Woetzel, J., & Stolyar, K. (2016). A future that works: Automation, employment, and productivity. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Mbiti, I., & Weil, D. N. (2013). The Economic Effects of Mobile Money. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. McKinsey (2023). Building Trust in Digital Financial Services. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. McKinsey (2023). Digital Finance in Africa: A Review of the Current State and Future Prospects. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. OECD (2023). Financial Literacy and Digital Tools. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. PwC (2023). User Experience and Education in Digital Banking. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. UNCDF (2023). The Role of Mobile Network Operators in Financial Inclusion. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. UNCDF (2023). The fintech landscape in Zambia: Executive summary. Lusaka: United Nations Capital Development Fund. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. World Bank (2018). World Development Report 2018: Learning to Realize Education's Promise. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. World Bank (2020). Global Financial Development Report 2019/2020. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. World Bank (2024). Global Findex Database 2021: Financial Inclusion, Digital Payments, and Resilience in the Age of COVID-19. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. World Bank Group (2023). Cashless societies in advanced economies: Lessons for developing countries. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. World Bank Group (2024). Accelerating digital transformation in Zambia: Digital economy diagnostic report. Washington, DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. ZICTA (2024). Annual report on digital financial services in Zambia. Lusaka: Zambia Information and Communications Technology Authority. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Zulu, J. (2022). ICT investments and financial performance in Zambian banks: A case study of Atlas Mara and Standard Chartered Bank Zambia. Journal of African Banking Studies, 15(2), 45–62. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles