Exploring Predictors of Safety Behaviors among Railway Construction Workers in Malaysia: A Pilot Study
Authors
Faculty of Technology and Applied Sciences, Open University Malaysia;Faculty of Defence Studies and Management, National Defence University of Malaysia (Malaysia)
Siti Nurhafizah Saleeza Ramlee
Faculty of Defence Studies and Management, National Defence University of Malaysia (Malaysia)
Faculty of Defence Studies and Management, National Defence University of Malaysia (Malaysia)
Faculty of Technology and Applied Sciences, Open University Malaysia (Malaysia)
Faculty of Technology and Applied Sciences, Open University Malaysia (Malaysia)
Faculty of Technology and Applied Sciences, Open University Malaysia (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200035
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 384-392
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-14
Accepted: 2025-11-21
Published: 2025-12-31
Abstract
Malaysia’s rapid expansion of railway infrastructure has intensified the need to understand the behavioural factors that influence safety performance among railway construction workers. Despite the sector’s high-risk environment characterised by electrical hazards, elevated structures, complex coordination, and multi-contractor operations empirical research focusing on behavioural predictors in Malaysian railway construction remains limited. This study explores the extent to which management commitment, safety training, and safety motivation influence workers’ safety behaviour. A quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted among 30 workers involved in trackwork, overhead line, structural, and system integration activities. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression. The findings show that safety training (β = .591, p < .001) and safety motivation (β = .358, p = .011) significantly predict safety behaviour, highlighting the critical role of competency development and intrinsic motivation in promoting safe work practices. However, management commitment was not a significant predictor (p = .931), suggesting that organisational intentions may not always translate into frontline behavioural outcomes in subcontractor-driven project environments. These results underscore the need for targeted training strategies and motivation-enhancing approaches to strengthen behaviour-based safety in Malaysia’s railway construction sector. The study offers preliminary insights that can inform larger-scale investigations and support ongoing efforts to cultivate a stronger safety culture in railway infrastructure development.
Keywords
safety behaviour, railway construction, safety training, safety motivation, management commitment
Downloads
References
1. Amdan, S. M., Ramlee, S. N. S., & Daruis, D. D. I. (2024). Assessment of knowledge, attitude and practices (KAP) towards the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder (WMSD) among Malaysian railway maintenance workers. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Practices, 7(26), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEMP.726029 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Alruqi, W. M., & Hallowell, M. R. (2019). Safety climate and safety behavior in the construction industry: The moderating role of gender. Safety Science, 120, 397–405. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Burke, M. J., Salvador, R., Smith-Crowe, K., Chan-Serafin, S., Smith, A., & Sonesh, S. (2020). The dread factor: How hazards and safety training influence learning and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(5), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000442 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Fernández-Muñiz, B., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2017). The role of safety leadership and working conditions in safety performance in manufacturing. Journal of Safety Research, 62, 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.009 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Griffin, M. A., & Curcuruto, M. (2016). Safety climate in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015062414 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Him, N. F. N., & Ismail, M. (2023). Assessment of safety management attitude and its effect on safety culture among construction workers in Malaysia. Planning Malaysia, 21(4), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.21837/pmj2023v21i4a10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Isa, N. M., Rahim, Z. A., & Johari, R. (2022). Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms and associated factors among Malaysian workers in labour-intensive sectors. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, 22(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.37268/mjphm/vol22/no2/art16 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Ismail, Z., Hashim, Z., & Ahmad, M. I. (2020). Determinants of safety motivation and safety compliance among Malaysian construction workers. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 25(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2020.25.1.4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Ismail, Z., Mahmud, R., & Halim, M. F. (2023). Human factors and operational risks in Malaysia’s railway maintenance sector. Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 20(1), 12–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ismail, Z., Mohd Saidin, M. I., & Aziz, N. N. A. (2023). Safety training effectiveness and safety behaviour among Malaysian construction workers. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 29(3), 784–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1958764 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Kang, S., Lee, H., & Seo, H. (2021). The role of safety training in improving construction workers’ safety behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 3148. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063148 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Katsakiori, P., Sakellaropoulos, G., & Papazoglou, I. (2020). Human and organizational factors in railway accidents: A systematic review. Safety Science, 124, 104610. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104610 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Kim, S., Park, Y., & Lee, H. (2021). Safety motivation and compliance among construction workers: A mediating analysis. Safety Science, 139, 105226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105226 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Lingard, H., Cooke, T., & Osborne, C. (2022). Improving safety performance in major infrastructure projects: A behavioural perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 40(5), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.2007041 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Mansour, S., Ali, M., & Ahmed, V. (2021). Behavioral causes of construction accidents: A systematic review. Safety Science, 142, 105401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105401 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Mohd Said, A., Latiff, A. R., & Baharudin, N. (2022). Safety motivation and compliance among construction workers in Southeast Asia. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 28(4), 1895–1904. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2021.1955790 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Neal, A., & Griffin, M. A. (2006). A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behaviour and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 946–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Rahim, N., Singh, B., & Mohamed, S. (2020). Factors contributing to accidents in the Malaysian construction industry. Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 17(2), 45–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Schwatka, N. V., & Rosecrance, J. (2016). Safety training and its impact on worker behaviour in high-risk industries. Journal of Safety Research, 56, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2015.12.005 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Zaira, M. M., & Hadikusumo, B. H. W. (2017). The influence of management commitment on safety performance in construction projects. Safety Science, 98, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.05.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Zhang, L., Li, H., & Ng, S. T. (2021). Safety risks and behavioural compliance in complex rail construction environments. Automation in Construction, 127, 103688. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103688 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Zhang, S., Teo, E. A. L., & Feng, Y. (2020). A systems-thinking perspective of construction safety behaviour. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(10), 3119–3141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Zhang, W., Fang, D., & Wu, H. (2020). Safety motivation and safety behavior: A meta-analysis. Safety Science, 124, 104606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104606 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria