Exploring the Challenge Impeding Carbon Reduction in Malaysian Construction Industry
Authors
Faculty of Civil Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kompleks Pusat Pengajian Jejawi 3, 02600 Arau, Perlis (Malaysia)
Faculty of Civil Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kompleks Pusat Pengajian Jejawi 3, 02600 Arau, Perlis (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200105
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 1427-1441
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-10
Accepted: 2025-12-17
Published: 2026-01-01
Abstract
Malaysia's construction industry is recognized as a major emitter of carbon, with a slow rate in adopting effective mitigation strategies. This study explores the main hindrances facing G7 contractors in the states of Kedah and Perlis, focusing on four key areas: resource and prioritization, policy and standards, risk and commitment, and awareness and complexity. Adopting a quantitative research approach and applying SPSS Version 25 software for analysis, the findings reveal financial constraints, the ineffectiveness of policy enforcement, and inadequate technical know-how as major stumbling blocks. Therefore, this study suggested that the measures include strengthening policy enforcement effectiveness, initiating capacity-building initiatives, and creating incentive-based programs to enhance low-carbon construction strategies. These findings are critical for promoting national sustainability goals and realizing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Keywords
Carbon minimization refers to the determination of means to cut down
Downloads
References
1. M. Chan, M. A. N. Masrom, and S. S. Yasin, “Selection of Low-Carbon Building Materials in Construction Projects: Construction Professionals’ Perspectives,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 4, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12040486. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. K. Davidson, N. Gunawan, J. Ambrosano, S. Leisa, and B. Brakarz, “Green-Infrastructure-Investment-Opportunities-Brazil-2019,” pp. 1–52, Aug. 2020, Accessed: Nov. 20, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0002638 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. I. K. Maji, M. S. Habibullah, and M. Y. Saari, “Financial development and sectoral CO2 emissions in Malaysia,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 7160–7176, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-8326-1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. M. Kamaliah, M. Mat Isa, D. Ekundayo, and V. R. Joseph, “Barriers and Strategies for Improving Carbon Emissions Management Approaches in Malaysian Construction,” vol. 22:3, 99–123, Sep. 2022, Accessed: Nov. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: . https:// doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB. v22i3.7909 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. M. Klufallah, I. S. Ibrahim, and F. Moayedi, “Sustainable practices barriers towards green projects in Malaysia,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Institute of Physics Publishing, Feb. 2019. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/220/1/012053. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. S. Arogundade, M. Dulaimi, and S. Ajayi, “Holistic Review of Construction Process Carbon-Reduction Measures: A Systematic Literature Review Approach,” Buildings, vol. 13, no. 7, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.3390/buildings13071780. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. J. Giesekam, J. R. Barrett, and P. Taylor, “Construction sector views on low carbon building materials,” Building Research and Information, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 423–444, May 2016, doi: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1086872. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. S. Arogundade, M. Dulaimi, and S. Ajayi, “Exploring the challenges impeding construction process carbon reduction in the UK,” International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 422–431, 2024, doi: 10.1080/15623599.2023.2257512. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. M. Samari, N. Godrati, R. Esmaeilifar, P. Olfat, and M. W. M. Shafiei, “The investigation of the barriers in developing green building in Malaysia,” Mod Appl Sci, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–10, 2013, doi: 10.5539/mas.v7n2p1. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. F. A. Mohd-Rahim, A. Pirotti, A. Keshavarzsaleh, N. Zainon, and N. Zakaria, “Green Construction Project: A Critical Review of Retrofitting Awarded Green Buildings in Malaysia,” 2017. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. P. He, T. T. P. Bui, W. Shahzad, S. Wilkinson, and N. Domingo, “Towards Effective Implementation of Carbon Reduction Strategies in Construction Procurement: A Case Study of New Zealand,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 10, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.3390/buildings12101570. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Z. Shari and V. Soebarto, “Investigating sustainable practices in the Malaysian office building developments,” Construction Innovation, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 17–35, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1108/CI-12-2012-0064. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Q. Du, J. Zhou, T. Pan, Q. Sun, and M. Wu, “Relationship of carbon emissions and economic growth in China’s construction industry,” J Clean Prod, vol. 220, pp. 99–109, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.123. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. M. Tavakol and R. Dennick, “Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha,” Jun. 27, 2011. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. A. Ghasemi and S. Zahediasl, “Normality tests for statistical analysis: A guide for non-statisticians,” Int J Endocrinol Metab, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 486–489, 2012, doi: 10.5812/ijem.3505. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. J. Bocianowski, D. Wrońska-Pilarek, A. Krysztofiak-Kaniewska, K. Matusiak, and B. Wiatrowska, “Comparison of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients for selected traits of Pinus sylvestris L.,” Biometrical Letters, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 115–135, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.2478/bile-2024-0008. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. J. C. F. de Winter, S. D. Gosling, and J. Potter, “Comparing the pearson and spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: A tutorial using simulations and empirical data,” Psychol Methods, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 273–290, Sep. 2016, doi: 10.1037/met0000079. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. P. Lombardo, “Standardization of Weighted Ranking Correlation Coefficients,” Apr. 2025, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar