The Sound of Fairness: Ethical Communication and the Principles of Natural Justice

While the principles of natural justice, namely audi alteram partem (the right to be heard) and nemo judex in causa sua (freedom from bias) are well-established in legal and administrative procedures, their effectiveness is often undermined by poor or unethical communication. The problem lies in the frequent disconnect between formal procedural compliance and the ethical obligation to communicate clearly, respectfully and accessibly. This paper addresses that gap by exploring the critical role of ethical communication in ensuring that natural justice is not only upheld in form but also experienced in substance. The objectives of the study are to examine how ethical communication supports the delivery of natural justice, identify key shortcomings in current practices and propose communicative standards that reinforce fairness in both legal and quasi-legal settings. Using a qualitative methodology, the paper employs doctrinal legal analysis, case study evaluation and content analysis of interdisciplinary literature. Selected Malaysian and common law cases serve as examples where communication practices either upheld or undermined justice. The novelty of this research lies in its interdisciplinary approach, integrating legal doctrine with communication ethics to argue that fairness must not only be seen but also heard. It introduces the metaphor of “the sound of fairness” to highlight how tone, timing, and clarity impact the perceived legitimacy of decisions. The study offers practical benefits to legal practitioners, policymakers, educators and institutional decision-makers. By promoting ethically sound communication practices, it enhances procedural fairness, protects individual dignity and rebuilds public trust in institutions. Ultimately, this paper proposes that ethical communication is not merely supportive of natural justice, it is essential to its meaningful realisation.

Communication, Ethics, Fairness, Natural Justice

1. Ahmad, W. A., Nik Mahmod, N. A. K., & Hingun, M. (2021). Administrative Law in Malaysia (2nd ed.). Sweet & Maxwell. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alagan, S. (2019). Federal Constitution: A Commentary. Thomson Reuters Asia Sdn Bhd. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Albaki, MNH. (2025). Principles Of Fairness and Justice in a Trial. Current law Journal [2025] CLJU(A) xv [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Bakar, H.A. & Connaughton, S.L. (2022). Ethical Leadership, Perceived Leader–Member Ethical Communication and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour: Development and Validation of a Multilevel Model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2021-0356 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Baljit, D., & Sidhu, S. (2012). The Discovery Process in Criminal Litigation: Section 51A of the Criminal Procedure Code. Malayan Law Journal [2012] 1 MLJ cxxxvi. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Bowen, S. A. (2020). Communication Ethics as a Foundational Construct in Applied Communication Theory, Research and Practice. The Handbook of Applied Communication Research. Chapter 33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Calub, C. (2021). Ethics In Communication: A Focus on Verbal and Non-Verbal Sexual Harassment. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.24862.46400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dubey, S.K. & Singh, R.N. (2025). Doctrine of Natural Justice: Evolution, Principles, and Application in Indian Legal System. International Journal of Judicial Law. 2025;4(6):24–7. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Grunig, J.E. (2014). Ethics problems and theories in public relations. Revue Internationale De Communication Sociale Et Publique (RICSP). 2014, n. 11, p. 15-28. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Hector, C. (2018, October 4). Disclose prosecution evidence, witnesses to defence lawyers before trial. Aliran. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Ikhsan, M.I., Kamarudin, S., Mustafa, MSA. (2024). Introduction to Administrative Law. Malaha PLT. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jain, M.P. (2011). MP Jain's Administrative Law of Malaysia and Singapore. Malayan Law Journal, 4th Ed, 2011. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kalogiannidis, S., Spinthiropoulos, K., Chatzitheodoridis, F., Kalfas, D., Kantzios, N. (2025). Communication Ethics in Business: Examining the Role of Ethical Communication in Building Trust and Sustainability. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(3) 2025, pages: 1770-1783. DOI: 10.53894/ijirss.v8i3.6885 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Laksana, M. O., & Nurhaliza, N. (2023). The Impact of Communication Ethics on The Communication Quality in Interpersonal Relationships. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 3(5), 989–995. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v3i5.815 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Makau, J.M. (2009). Ethical and Unethical Communication. https://api.semanticscholar.org/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mohammed Na’aim, M. S., Rajamanickam, R., & Nordin, R. (2022). The Right of an Accused to Defence under the Criminal Justice System in Malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), 7(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss1pp43-58 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Mustafa, M. S. A., Othman, Y., Malib, M. A., & Mahat, I. R. (2023). Managing the Rules of Natural Justice amongst Teachers in Melaka. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(1), 1744–1756. DOI:10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i1/16704 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mustafa, M.S.A., Nawi, N.F. Abdullah, A. (2018). Principles of Administrative Law, Course Guide. Edition 2018. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Onuorah, O. R., Nwodo, A. J., Onah, H. C., & Odoh, S. C. (2024). Understanding Natural Law Principles of Audi Altarem Partem Doctrine from the Administrative Law Perspectives. International Journal of Law and Global Policy (IJLGP), 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11343478 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Pelesiah, O. (2022). Ethical Communication for Better Organization Management. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS) |Volume VI, Issue VII, July 2022|ISSN 2454-6186. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Perez, A., Sakakibara, R., Baireddy, S. Fetters, M.D., Guetterman, T.C. (2025). Examining Nonverbal Communication in Dyadic Interactions with Virtual Humans Using an Integrated Coding System: Mixed Methods Analysis. JMIR Formative Research, Volume 9,2025. doi:10.2196/59328 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Singh, A.P. (2015). Reasoned Decision: The Necessity and Importance to Achieve Transparent and Accountable Society. Journal of National Law University Delhi, Vol.3, 163-181. DOI: 10.1177/2277401720150110 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wade. W, Forsyth, C., Ghosh, J. (2022). Wade & Forsyth's Administrative Law. 12th Ed. Oxford University Press, 2022. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Zukiferee, I., Majid, A., & Mohamed, T. (2019). The Right to Oral Hearing in Disciplinary Proceedings against Public Servants: A Malaysian Perspective. University Utara Malaysia Journal of Legal Studies (UUMJLS) (Vol. 10, Issue 1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Conflict of Law in the Safeguarding of Malaysian Intangible Cultural Heritage: A Way Forward
• Alternative Dispute Resolution in India: A Brief Overview Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. - William E. Gladstone
• The Role of Museums in Safeguarding Cultural Heritage Rights: Balancing Access and Repatriation
• An Evaluation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' Significance and Application in Nigeria
• The Role of International Law in Shaping National Immigration Policies.