Reassessing Role Stressors as Drivers of Organizational Commitment:Evidence from Contract-Based Lecturers in Chinese Higher Education

Authors

Gao Liu

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (Malaysia)

Abang Azlan Mohamad

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (Malaysia)

May-Chiun Lo

Guangzhou University of Software (China)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200129

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 1729-1741

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-15

Accepted: 2025-12-22

Published: 2026-01-03

Abstract

This study examines the influence of role ambiguity, role conflict, and role overload on affective, continuance, and normative commitment among contract-based university lecturers in Jiangsu Province, China. While role stressors are traditionally viewed as detrimental to employee well-being, this study proposes that, under specific academic and cultural conditions, they may positively reinforce organizational commitment. Drawing on Role Theory, Organizational Commitment Theory, and the Job Demands–Resources Model, a structural equation modeling approach (SmartPLS 4.0) was used to analyze data from 305 valid responses. Results indicate that all three role stressors significantly and positively affect the three dimensions of commitment, suggesting that complex academic roles can serve as motivational challenges when supported by institutional frameworks. These findings contribute to a contextualized understanding of stressor–commitment relationships in non-tenured academic settings and offer implications for role management, performance appraisal, and contract policy reforms in higher education institutions.

Keywords

role ambiguity; role conflict; role overload

Downloads

References

1. Amadi, S. (2024). Impact of human capital development on economic growth in Nigeria. South East Journal of Political Science, 10(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Allam, Z. (2024). Unraveling the links between role stressors, commitment, and intention to leave. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(2), 20730–20751. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Allam, Z., Ali, N., & Jeet, V. (2024). Unraveling the links between role stressors, commitment facets, and turnover intentions: A study of healthcare workers in Saudi Arabia. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 22(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Anglin, A. H., Kincaid, P. A., Short, J. C., & Allen, D. G. (2022). Role theory perspectives: Past, present, and future applications of role theories in management research. Journal of Management, 48(6), 1469–1502. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Ansari, A. N., Ahmad, S., & Bhutta, S. M. (2024). Mapping the global evidence around the use of ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic scoping review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(9), 11281– 11321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). An examination of the validity of two models of attitude. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16(3), 323–359. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Bakker, A. B. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 25–53. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Beehr, T. A. (1976). Perceived situational moderators of the relationship between subjective role ambiguity and role strain. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(1), 35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Beehr, T. A., Walsh, J. T., & Taber, T. D. (1976). Relationships of stress to individually and organizationally valued states: Higher order needs as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(1), 41. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Bliese, P. D., & Castro, C. A. (2000). Role clarity, work overload and organizational support: Multilevel evidence of the importance of support. Work & Stress, 14(1), 65–73. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Cai, X., & Ali, A. (2024). Navigating workplace conflicts and fostering innovative behaviors: The role of job commitment and socio-instrumental ESM utilization. BMC Psychology, 12, 587. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65–74. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Chang, S. (2024). How does Confucian culture shape employee gratitude and organizational outcomes?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 55(3), 345–366. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Cheng, G. H. L., & Chan, D. K. S. (2008). Who suffers more from job insecurity? A meta-analytic review. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Applied Psychology, 57(2), 272–303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Cooke, F. L., & Xu, W. (2024). Extending the research frontiers of employee mental health through contextualisation: China as an example with implications for human resource management research and practice. Personnel Review, 53(5), 1092–1109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Coverman, S. (1989). Role overload, role conflict, and stress: Addressing consequences of multiple role demands. Social Forces, 67(4), 965–982. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles