Expressive Pixels: The Influence of Emoji on Tone Interpretation in Digital Communication

This study examined the influence of emojis on tone interpretation in digital communication among Senior High School students of Dapa National High School during the School Year 2025–2026. A quantitative descriprive research design was employed, and data were collected from 253 Grade 11 and Grade 12 students using a validated survey questionnaire. Results indicated that students perceived emojis as moderately influential in interpreting tone, with the type of emoji used obtaining the highest mean (M = 3.18, SD = 0.63), followed by preferred communication platform (M = 3.15, SD = 0.75), frequency of emoji use (M = 3.14, SD = 0.96), and message context (M = 3.13, SD = 1.75). Analysis of variance revealed no significant differences when respondents were grouped according to age and sex (p > 0.05); however, a significant difference was found in frequency of emoji use when grouped by grade level (F = 34.80, p < 0.001). Significant differences were also observed based on preferred communication platform in terms of frequency of emoji use (F = 7.95, p < 0.001). Pearson’s correlation showed significant relationships between message context and type of emoji used (r = 0.24, p < 0.001), between preferred communication platform and frequency of emoji use (r = 0.22, p < 0.001), and between preferred communication platform and message context (r = 0.50, p < 0.001). These findings indicate that emojis play an important role in clarifying tone in digital communication, particularly when used appropriately across platforms and contexts. These findings indicate that emojis play an important role in clarifying tone in digital communication, particularly when used appropriately across platforms and contexts. In light of these results, it is recommended that students be encouraged to develop greater awareness of context-appropriate and platform-sensitive emoji use to minimize misinterpretation and enhance clarity in digital communication.

Emoji Use, Tone Interpretation

1. Bai, Q., Dan, Q., Mu, Z., & Yang, M. (2019). A systematic review of emoji: Current research and future perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2221. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bowden, J. (2023). Gender and generational differences in emoji interpretation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 42(3), 389–405. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bridging the Gap in Workplace Technology Adoption. (2023). Emojis and professionalism in digital workplaces. Organizational Communication Review, 15(2), 60–74.C [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Choi, Y., Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2023). Emotional signaling and social presence in text-based digital communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107531. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cross-Platform Emoji Interpretation Project. (2019). Emoji rendering and interpretation across platforms. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 13, 454–465. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & von Grumbkow, J. (2020). Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(5), 211–228. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Gantiva, C., Sotaquirá, M., & Araujo, A. (2020). Cortical processing of emojis and facial expressions: An ERP study. Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(1–2), 15–25. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Gesselman, A. N., Ta, V. P., & Garcia, J. R. (2019). Worth a thousand interpersonal words: Emoji as affective signals in digital communication. PLoS ONE, 14(8), e0221297. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Glikson, E., Cheshin, A., & van Kleef, G. A. (2018). The dark side of emojis: Effects on perceived competence in workplace communication. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(4), 1–9. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Guntuku, S. C., Li, M., Tay, L., & Ungar, L. H. (2019). Studying cultural differences in emoji usage across the globe. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 13, 226–235. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Jaeger, S. R., & Ares, G. (2019). Emojis and affective communication in digital messaging. Food Quality and Preference, 73, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Li, L., Wang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Emotional responses evoked by different types of emojis. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 1–12 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Miller, H., Kluver, D., Thebault-Spieker, J., Terveen, L., & Hecht, B. (2018). Understanding emoji ambiguity in context: The role of platform differences. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 12, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Park, J., Baek, Y. M., & Cha, M. (2020). Cross-cultural comparison of emoji usage and interpretation. New Media & Society, 22(8), 1498–1517 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Prada, M., Rodrigues, D. L., Garrido, M. V., Lopes, D., Cavalheiro, B., & Gaspar, R. (2018). Motives, frequency and attitudes toward emoji use. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 1925–1934. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Riordan, M. A. (2017). Emojis as tools for emotion work in digital communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 36(5), 549–567. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Rodrigues, D. L., Prada, M., Gaspar, R., Garrido, M. V., & Lopes, D. (2018). Emojis as emotional amplification in text messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sampietro, A. (2020). Emoji and rapport management in digital discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 161, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(S2), 107–131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Shandilya, S., Mehta, R., & Singh, P. (2022). Digital tone perception and message framing in online communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(3), zmac012. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Tigwell, G. W., & Flatla, D. R. (2019). Oh that’s what you meant!: Reducing emoji misunderstanding. Proceedings of the 2019 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Wang, Y., Jiang, L., & Zhou, S. (2024). Emoji use as nonverbal cues in online interpersonal communication. Journal of Social Media Studies, 8(2), 101–118. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Weissman, B., & Tanner, D. (2018). A strong wink between verbal and emoji-based irony. Discourse Processes, 55(7), 1– [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Wired. (2018). The origin story of the emoji. Wired Magazine. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Xu, H. (2024). Platform design and emoji-based tone interpretation. Human–Computer Interaction Journal, 39(2), 215–231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Ye, Z. (2024). Emotional clarity and emoji use in digital text communication. Journal of Language and Technology, 12(1), 55–70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Zuhdi, M., & Yusuf, F. (2024). Emojis as visual-linguistic tools in online discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 88–104. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Communication Strategies among Promoters During MATTA Fair 2025
• An Examination of Colleen Ballinger’s Experience in Social Media: Cancel Culture Chronicle
• Communication Patterns in Conflict Interactions in Premarital Couples Who Are in Abusive Relationships
• Social Media Use on Mental Health Outcomes among Adolescents and Young Adults in Port Harcourt City
• (Un)Successful Error Repairs in L2 Communication