Influence of a Flipped Classroom Approach on Achievement and Motivation in Grade 9 Chemistry: Evidence from a Resource-Limited Context

Authors

Raihana M. Mangilala

Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Dr. Edna B. Nabua

Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200156

Subject Category: Chemistry

Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 2062-2072

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-22

Accepted: 2025-12-27

Published: 2026-01-03

Abstract

This study examined the use of a flipped classroom instructional approach in teaching periodic trends in Grade 9 chemistry, with emphasis on students’ academic achievement and learning motivation. A quasi-experimental one-group pretest–posttest design was employed involving learners from a resource-limited secondary school. Data were collected using a researcher-developed achievement test and a validated learning motivation questionnaire administered before and after the instructional intervention. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, and Spearman’s rank-order correlation.
The results showed statistically significant improvements in students’ achievement following the implementation of the flipped classroom approach, as evidenced by higher posttest scores compared to pretest scores. Students’ learning motivation also demonstrated a statistically significant increase after the intervention. However, correlational analysis revealed no statistically significant relationship between achievement and motivation in both pre-intervention and post-intervention measures, indicating that changes in these variables were not linearly associated within the duration of the study. These findings suggest that instructional designs emphasizing pre-class engagement with content and structured in-class activities may be associated with improvements in learning outcomes and motivation.
Overall, the results highlight the potential of the flipped classroom approach as a learner-centered instructional option for teaching abstract chemistry concepts in resource-limited contexts, while underscoring the need for cautious interpretation due to the study’s design limitations. Future research is recommended to employ longer intervention periods, comparison groups, and additional learner-related variables to further examine the relationships among instructional design, motivation, and academic achievement.

Keywords

Academic Achievement, Chemistry Education, Flipped Classroom

Downloads

References

1. Bancroft, S. F., Jalaeian, M., & John, S. R. (2021). Systematic review of flipped instruction in undergraduate chemistry lectures (2007–2019): Facilitation, independent practice, accountability, and measure type matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(7), 2143–2155. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01327 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: Towards a conceptual framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1625–1643. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09775-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Cheng, L., Ritzhaupt, A. D., & Antonenko, P. (2019). Effects of the flipped classroom instructional strategy on students’ learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(4), 793–824.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9633-7 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Han, E., & Røkenes, F. M. (2020). Flipped classroom in teacher education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education,5,601.https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.601 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Howard, J. L., Bureau, J. S., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300–1323.https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Jeno, L. M., Grytnes, J. A., & Vandvik, V. (2019). The effect of a mobile-application tool on biology students’ motivation and achievement in species identification: A Self-Determination Theory perspective. Computers & Education,130,1–12.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compzdu.2018.11.011 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K–12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(4).https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121–131.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033546 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Mojica, E. R. E., & Upmacis, R. K. (2022). Challenges encountered and students’ reactions to practices utilized in a general chemistry laboratory course during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 99(2), 1053–1059. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00838 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Orosz, G., et al. (2023). Guided inquiry-based learning in secondary-school chemistry classes: A case study. Chemistry Education Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00110A [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2021). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior,69,371–380.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Scherrer, V., & Preckel, F. (2019). Development of motivational variables and self-esteem during the school career: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Review of Educational Research, 89(2), 211–258. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318819127 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Shi, X. Y., et al. (2024). Is the flipped classroom more effective than traditional teaching? A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1485540 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). Student satisfaction with courses and instructors in a flipped classroom: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 30, 100314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Talsma, K., Schüz, B., Schwarzer, R., & Norris, K. (2018). I believe, therefore I achieve (and vice versa): A meta-analytic cross-lagged panel analysis of self-efficacy and academic performance. Learning and Individual Differences,61,136–150.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.015 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., Agrawal, S., Arroyo, E. N., Behling, S., … Freeman, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(12),6476–6483.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916903117 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 313–340. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2274 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles