Visualising Disruption Management: Integrating EDM and Justice Theory for Airport Rail Link Services

This study investigates how Airport Rail Link (ARL) users without prior experience of service disruption evaluate disruption management strategies during unexpected disruptions. While previous studies have focused on passengers who have encountered disruptions, little is known about the expectations and perceptions of users who have never faced such events. Integrating the Expectancy Disconfirmation Model (EDM) with Justice Theory, this study examines the roles of normative expectations, perceived fairness and performance in shaping disconfirmation judgments. To address methodological challenges in capturing expectations for hypothetical scenarios, a comic-strip-based questionnaire was developed. This visual approach depicted realistic disruption scenarios and response actions, enabling respondents to assess fairness across distributive, procedural and interactional dimensions before comparing perceived performance with initial expectations. The instrument was pretested and piloted to ensure its clarity and feasibility in terms of timing. Data were collected from 290 ARL users who confirmed they had never experienced a service disruption. Responses were analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling to test hypothesized relationships and mediation effects. Results reveal that perceived fairness of response actions strongly influences disconfirmation and fully mediates the effect of expectations, highlighting the critical role of performance perception in shaping judgments. Importance-Performance Map Analysis further identified perceived fairness as the most influential construct. The findings underscore the importance of transparent communication and fairness-driven response actions in building trust among regular users who may hold idealized expectations. From a methodological perspective, the study demonstrates the value of visual stated preference instruments for eliciting meaningful responses in hypothetical contexts. Practical implications include designing proactive communication strategies and fairness-oriented response measures to enhance resilience and user confidence in the face of unexpected disruptions.

Airport Rail Link Service; Disruption

1. Aguilar-Rojas, Ó., Fandos-Herrera, C., & Pérez-Rueda, A. (2024). The importance of social comparison in perceived justice during the service recovery process. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 33(4), 488–504. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Auld, J., Ley, H., Verbas, O., Golshani, N., Bechara, J., & Fontes, A. (2020). A stated-preference intercept survey of transit-rider response to service disruptions. Public Transport, 12(3), 557–585. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Cherchi, E., & Hensher, D. A. (2015). Workshop synthesis: Stated preference surveys and experimental design, an audit of the journey so far and future research perspectives. Transportation Research Procedia, 11, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Chih, W.-H., Wang, K.-Y., Hsu, L.-C., & Cheng, I. S. (2012). From disconfirmation to switching: An empirical investigation of switching intentions after service failure and recovery. The Service Industries Journal, 32(8), 1305–1321. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Currie, G., & Muir, C. (2017). Understanding passenger perceptions and behaviors during unplanned rail disruptions. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 4392–4402. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Friesen, J., Van Stan, J. T., & Elleuche, S. (2018). Communicating science through comics: A method. Publications, 6(3), 38. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (pls-sem) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Hien, N. N., Long, N. T., Liem, V. T., & Luu, D. X. (2024). Customer responses to airline service failure: Perspectives from expectation disconfirmation theory. Sage Open, 14(2), 21582440241248334. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Hjortskov, M. (2020). Interpreting expectations: Normative and predictive expectations from the citizens’ viewpoint. Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, 3(1), 1–11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Itani, A., Aboudina, A., Diab, E., Srikukenthiran, S., & Shalaby, A. (2019). Managing unplanned rail disruptions: Policy implications and guidelines towards an effective bus bridging strategy. Transportation Research Record, 2673(4), 473–489. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kaewunruen, S., & Osman, M. H. (2023). Dealing with disruptions in railway track inspection using risk-based machine learning. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 2141. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kalyanpad, N. G., Hanni, C. K., & Rao, K. V. K. (2020). Mode choice analysis using web-based revealed preference questionnaire, stated preference experiment and google maps api. Transportation Research Procedia, 48, 3390–3400. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Liao, Y. K., Wu, C. Y., Truong, G. N., & Do, Y. T. (2022). The roles of service recovery and perceived justice on post-recovery satisfaction in m-commerce. Sustainability, 14(22), 14838. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lu, Q.-C., Zuo, X.-Y., Chen, C., Dong, Z., Xu, P.-C., & Li, J. (2025). The heterogeneity of travel mode choice behavior under unplanned metro service disruptions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 142, 104683. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Malandri, C., Mantecchini, L., & Postorino, M. N. (2017). Airport ground access reliability and resilience of transit networks: A case study. Transportation Research Procedia, 27, 1129–1136. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Matikiti, R., Mpinganjira, M., & Roberts-Lombard, M. (2018). Antecedents and outcomes of positive disconfirmation after service failure and recovery. Journal of Global Business and Technology, 14(2), 43–57. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. McCollough, M. A., Berry, L. L., & Yadav, M. S. (2000). An empirical investigation of customer satisfaction after service failure and recovery. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 121–137. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Migacz, S. J., Zou, S., & Petrick, J. F. (2018). The “terminal” effects of service failure on airlines: Examining service recovery with justice theory. Journal of Travel Research, 57(1), 83–98. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Naohiko, H., Osamu, N., Shigeru, M., Hitoshi, I., & Norio, T. (2017). Recovery measure of disruption in train operation in tokyo metropolitan area. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 4370–4380. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Osman, M. H., Kaewunruen, S., Ann, M., & Dindar, S. (2016). Disruption management of resource schedule in transportation sector: Understanding the concept and strategy. Procedia Engineering, 161, 1295–1299. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Piner, D., & Condry, B. (2017). International best practices in managing unplanned disruption to suburban rail services. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 4403–4410. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rahimi, E., Shamshiripour, A., Shabanpour, R., Mohammadian, A., & Auld, J. (2019). Analysis of transit users’ waiting tolerance in response to unplanned service disruptions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 77, 639–653. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Salomon, I., & Singer, R. (2011). Why did the chicken cross the road, and what’s funny about it? The role of transportation cartoons in social experiences. Transport Policy, 18(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Schiebler, T., Lee, N., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2025). Expectancy-disconfirmation and consumer satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Van Ryzin, G. G. (2005). Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(4), 599–611. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Wang, X., Jin, J. G., & Sun, L. (2022). Real-time dispatching of operating buses during unplanned disruptions to urban rail transit system. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 139, 103696. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Yim, C. K. B., Gu, F. F., Chan, K. W., & Tse, D. K. (2003). Justice-based service recovery expectations: Measurement and antecedents. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction & Complaining Behavior, 16, 36–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria