The Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning Approach with IR4.0 Integration on Mastering Spanish Vocabulary Among University Students in Malaysia

Authors

Radhiah Ismail

Centre for Fundamental and Continuing Education (PPAL), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (Malaysia)

Aida Husni Abdul Hamid

School of Languages, Civilisation and Philosophy, Universiti Utara (Malaysia)

Han Jung Shun

Centre for Fundamental and Continuing Education (PPAL), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (Malaysia)

Nurul Hidayah Mat

Centre for Fundamental and Continuing Education (PPAL), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (Malaysia)

Nurul Ain Chua Abdullah

Centre for Fundamental and Continuing Education (PPAL), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (Malaysia)

Mariyati Mohd Nor

Faculty of Languages and Communication, Sultan Idris Education University (Malaysia)

Salina Husain

Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication, University of Putra (Malaysia)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200203

Subject Category: Communication

Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 2655-2666

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-02

Accepted: 2025-12-08

Published: 2026-01-06

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness and pedagogical appropriateness of integrating Project-Based Learning (PBL) with Industry 4.0 (IR 4.0) digital tools in enhancing Spanish vocabulary mastery among Malaysian university students. Grounded in constructivist and experiential learning theories, the study adopts a mixed-methods exploratory design employing a one-group pre–post quasi-experimental approach with embedded qualitative data. Quantitative data were obtained from vocabulary pre- and post-tests as well as writing and speaking assessments linked to a video-based project, while qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews and classroom observations. Participants comprised 24 undergraduate students enrolled in a Level 3 Spanish course at a public university in Malaysia, with eight students purposively selected for the qualitative phase. Quantitative findings revealed a statistically significant improvement in vocabulary performance from pre-test to post-test, with a large effect size, indicating the strong impact of the PBL + IR 4.0 intervention. Improvements were also observed in students’ writing and speaking performance, as reflected in higher post-intervention grades. Qualitative findings further indicated positive student attitudes towards the approach, highlighting enhanced engagement, learner autonomy, digital literacy, and the development of transferable soft skills such as collaboration and time management. However, the study also identified several challenges, including unstable internet connectivity, financial constraints, unequal group participation, and unconducive home learning environments, reflecting broader digital divide issues. Overall, the findings suggest that PBL integrated with IR 4.0 tools constitutes a robust and adaptable pedagogical model for foreign language learning. The study contributes empirical evidence to the growing literature on technology-enhanced PBL and offers implications for instructional design, institutional support, and future research in digitally mediated language education.

Keywords

project-based learning; vocabulary

Downloads

References

1. Adnan, M., & Anwar, K. (2020). Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students’ perspectives. Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, 2(1), 45–51. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ajmain @ Jima’ain, M. T., Fatin Nabilah, M., Khadijah, A., & Aminuddin Hehsan, H. (2020). Penerokaan terhadap pengetahuan yang digunakan oleh guru inovatif pendidikan Islam untuk menghasilkan inovasi pengajaran. Akademika, 93(2), 1215–1225. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Anggraeni, C. W. (2018). Promoting Education 4.0 in English for survival class: What are the challenges? Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 2(1), 12–23. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Anđelković, J., Meršnik, M., & Jović, J. (2022). Project-based translation of Wikipedia articles in a tertiary ESP context: Planning, execution and lessons learnt. ESP Today, 10(1), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.18485/ESPTODAY.2022.10.1.6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Chung, E., Noor, N. M., & Mathew, V. N. (2020). Are you ready? An assessment of online learning readiness among university students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(5), 971–989. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Du, X., Lundberg, A., Ayari, M. A., Naji, K. K., & Hawari, A. (2022). Examining engineering students’ perceptions of learner agency enactment in problem- and project-based learning using Q methodology. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(1), 111–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20430 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Haji Gapor, A. L., & Yeop, M. A. (2013). Kesan pendekatan pembelajaran berasaskan projek berteraskan teknologi terhadap pencapaian dan penerimaan pelajar. Jurnal Bitara. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Imaz, J. I. (2021). “How has your city changed?” Using project-based learning to teach sociology of education. Education and Urban Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131245211004552 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Kowang, T. O., Bakry, M. F., Hee, O. C., Fei, G. C., Yew, L. K., Saadon, M. S. I., & Long, C. S. (2020). Industry 4.0 competencies among lecturers of higher learning institution in Malaysia. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(2), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i2.20520 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kumar, J. A. (2021). Educational chatbots for project-based learning: Investigating learning outcomes for a team-based design course. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00302-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Lai, C. L. (2021). Effects of the group-regulation promotion approach on students’ individual and collaborative learning performance, perceptions of regulation and regulation behaviours in project-based tasks. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2278–2298. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13138 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Mahsan, I. P. (2018). Aplikasi pembelajaran berasaskan projek bidang seni digital: Kajian kes di lima buah institusi pengajian tinggi di Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Makkonen, T., Tirri, K., & Lavonen, J. (2021). Engagement in learning physics through project-based learning: A case study of gifted Finnish upper-secondary-level students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(4), 501–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211018644 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Maria, M., Shahbodin, F., & Pee, N. C. (2018). Malaysian higher education system towards Industry 4.0 – Current trends overview. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2016(1), 020081. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Mioduser, D., & Betzer, N. (2003). The contribution of project-based learning to high achievers’ acquisition of technological knowledge and skills. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Mohd Aderi Che Noh, Normurni Mohamad, Adibah Hasanah Abd Halim, & Absha Atiah Abu Bakar. (2018). Perlaksanaan kaedah pembelajaran berasaskan projek dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Kaedah Fiqh. The Journal of Quran Sunnah Education and Special Needs. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Mohd Saad, H. (2018). Pembelajaran berasaskan projek (PBL): Impak pembudayaan 4C’s. Dalam Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan ke-25 (pp. xx–xx), IAB Bandar Enstek, Perak, Malaysia. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Muzana, S. R., Jumadi, Wilujeng, I., Yanto, B. E., & Mustamin, A. A. (2021). E-STEM project-based learning in teaching science to increase ICT literacy and problem solving. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1386–1394. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21942 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Rashid, W. H. W., Kob, C. G. C., & Abdullah, A. S. (2020). Keberkesanan pembelajaran berasaskan projek terhadap motivasi intrinsik dalam subjek Projek Tahun Akhir 1 (PTA1) di Kolej Vokasional Slim River. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Salmela, R., Lehtonen, M., Garusi, S., & Bertram, R. (2021). Lexize: A test to quickly assess vocabulary knowledge in Finnish. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 62(6), 806–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12768 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Tarigan, H. G. (1993). Berbicara sebagai suatu keterampilan berbahasa. Angkasa. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of project-based learning. Buck Institute for Education. http://www.bie.org/research/study/review_of_project_based_learning_2000/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Twinkl. (2022, February 12). What are literacy skills? https://www.twinkl.com/teaching-wiki/literacy-skills [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Vergara-Castañeda, A., Chávez-Miyauchi, T. E., Benítez-Rico, A., & Ogando-Justo, A. B. (2021). Implementing project-based learning as an effective alternative approach for chemistry practical courses online. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(11), 3502–3508. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00379 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. William H. Kilpatrick (1871–1965). (n.d.). StateUniversity.com. https://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2147/Kilpatrick-William-H-1871-1965.html [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language teaching. Edward Arnold. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Xiong, X., Zhang, W., Chen, W., & Ge, S. (2021). From lab scale to mass production: A project-based learning on the preparation of (S)-epichlorohydrin for enhancing college student engineering practical abilities. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(12), 3804–3812. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.1c00483 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Yusof, M. N. M., Musta’amal, A. H., Audu, R., & Ismail, N. S. (2015). Implementation of project-based learning (PjBL) at a Malaysian polytechnic: A preliminary study. Dalam Proceedings of INTCESS15 – 2nd International Conference on Education and Social Sciences, Turkey. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Zulfa, Z., Nusi, A., Ananda, A., Efi, A., & Pernantah, P. S. (2022). Using simulation on project-based learning in Minangkabau culture subject. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 311–326. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15118a [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles