Beyond Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of Technological Foundations and Human-Centric Values in Supply Chain 5.0
Authors
Cardiff Business School, Cardiff (United Kingdom)
Scholar School System, Birmingham (United Kingdom)
Scholar School System, Birmingham (United Kingdom)
Scholar School System, Birmingham (United Kingdom)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1014MG0001
Subject Category: Management
Volume/Issue: 10/14 | Page No: 1-19
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-24
Accepted: 2025-12-30
Published: 2026-01-06
Abstract
This paper discusses the development of Supply chain 4.0 to Supply chain 5.0 where models focus on automation as a result of efficiency to models that focus on human-centric whose focus is on resiliency, sustainability, and ethical mindset. Supply Chain 4.0 combines the use of technologies like IoT, cyber-physical systems, analytics of big data, and robotics to maximise the visibility of operations and responsiveness, it is mainly aimed at maximising throughput and lowering costs. However, Supply Chain 5.0 builds on all these by adding collaborative robots, blockchain verification, digital twins, and AI-driven multi-criteria optimization that manage the economic performance and the environment and social goals. The revolution entails intricate technological incorporation issues, employee adjustment, as well as reorganisation of the enterprise to meet the needs of hybrid man-machine cooperation and sustainability requirements. Other socio-economic and regulatory considerations, such as the problem of replacing workforce, development of skills, and adherence to the new environmental and labour standards, are discussed in this analysis, as well. The next steps include interdisciplinary cooperation in the field of engineering, environmental science, economic, and social policy to create supply chain systems that balance operational efficiency with ecological stewardship and social equity. New trends involve decentralised manufacturing, incorporation of renewable energy and proactive participation of workforce and proactive compliance regulation, all of which define supply chains as dynamic socio-technical ecosystems, able to sustain performance despite systemic disruptions.
Keywords
Supply Chain 5.0, Human-Centric Design
Downloads
References
1. Abdirad, M., & Krishnan, K. (2021). Industry 4.0 in logistics and supply chain management: A systematic literature review. Engineering Management Journal, 33(3), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2020.1783935 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Agrawal, S., Agrawal, R., Kumar, A., Luthra, S., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2024). Can industry 5.0 technologies overcome supply chain disruptions? –a perspective study on pandemics, war, and climate change issues. Operations Management Research, 17(3), 453–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00410-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Akbari, M., Kok, S. K., Hopkins, J., Frederico, G. F., Nguyen, H., & Alonso, A. D. (2024). The changing landscape of digital transformation in supply chains: Impacts of industry 4.0 in vietnam. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 1040–1072. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2022-0442 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Akundi, A., Euresti, D., Luna, S., Ankobiah, W., Lopes, A., & Edinbarough, I. (2022). State of industry 5.0– analysis and identification of current research trends. Applied Systems Innovation, 5, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5010027 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Bag, S., Telukdarie, A., Pretorius, J. H. C., & Gupta, S. (2021). Industry 4.0 and supply chain sustainability: Framework and future research directions. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(5), 1410–1450. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-03-2018-0056 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Boudouaia, M. A., Ouchani, S., Qaisar, S. M., & Almaktoom, A. T. (2024). Supply chain 5.0: Vision, challenges, and perspectives. In 2024 21st Learning and Technology Conference (L&T) (pp. 203-208). IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Chauhan, C., & Singh, A. (2020). A review of industry 4.0 in supply chain management studies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-04-2018-0105 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Fatorachian, H., & Kazemi, H. (2021). Impact of industry 4.0 on supply chain performance. Production Planning & Control, 32(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1712487 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Frederico, G. F. (2021). From supply chain 4.0 to supply chain 5.0: Findings from a systematic literature review and research directions. Logistics, 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics5030049 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Frederico, G. F., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, V., & Kumar, A. (2021). Performance measurement for supply chains in the industry 4.0 era: A balanced scorecard approach. International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management, 70(4), 789–807. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2019-0400 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Ghadge, A., Kara, M. E., Moradlou, H., & Goswami, M. (2020). The impact of industry 4.0 implementation on supply chains. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 669–686.https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-10-2019-0368 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Ghobakhloo, M., Iranmanesh, M., Fathi, M., Rejeb, A., Foroughi, B., & Nikbin, D. (2025). Beyond industry 4.0: A systematic review of industry 5.0 technologies and implications for social, environmental and economic sustainability. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 17(4), 889–914. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-08-2023-0384 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Golovianko, M., Terziyan, V., Branytskyi, V., & Malyk, D. (2023). Industry 4.0 vs. Industry 5.0: Co-existence, Transition, or a Hybrid. Procedia Computer Science, 217, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.206 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ivanov, D. (2022). The industry 5.0 framework: Viability-based integration of the resilience, sustainability, and human-centricity perspectives. International Journal of Production Research, 61(5), 1683–1695. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2118892 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Jefroy, N., Azarian, M., & Yu, H. (2022). Moving from industry 4.0 to industry 5.0: What are the implications for smart logistics? Logistics, 6, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics6020026 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Maria, E. D., Marchi, V. D., & Galeazzo, A. (2022). Industry 4.0 technologies and circular economy: The mediating role of supply chain integration. Bus Strat Env, 31. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2940 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Mastos, T. D., Nizamis, A., Vafeiadis, T., Alexopoulos, N., Ntinas, C., Gkortzis, D., Papadopoulos, A., Ioannidis, D., & Tzovaras, D. (2020). Industry 4.0 sustainable supply chains: An application of an IoT enabled scrap metal management solution. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122377 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Modgil, S., Singh, R. K., & Agrawal, S. (2025). Developing human capabilities for supply chains: An industry 5.0 perspective. Annals of Operations Research, 348, 2075–2105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479023-05245-1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Nazarian, H., & Khan, S. A. (2024). The impact of industry 5.0 on supply chain performance. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 16, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790241297022 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. Ralston, P., & Blackhurst, J. (2020). Industry 4.0 and resilience in the supply chain: A driver of capability enhancement or capability loss? International Journal of Production Research, 58(16), 5006–5019. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1736724 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Santhi, A. R., & Muthuswamy, P. (2023). Industry 5.0 or industry 4.0S? Introduction to industry 4.0 and a peek into the prospective industry 5.0 technologies. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 947–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-023-01217-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Shao, X.-F., Liu, W., Li, Y., Chaudhry, H. R., & Yue, X.-G. (2021). Multistage implementation framework for smart supply chain management under industry 4.0. Technological Forecasting & Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120354 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Sobb, T., Turnbull, B., & Moustafa, N. (2020). Supply chain 4.0: A survey of cyber security challenges, solutions and future directions. Electronics. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9111864 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Tiwari, S. (2020). Supply chain integration and Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review. Benchmarking an International Journal, 28(3), 990–1030. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-08-2020-0428 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Varriale, V., Cammarano, A., Michelino, F., & Caputo, M. (2023). Industry 5.0 and triple bottom line approach in supply chain management: The state-of-the-art. Sustainability, 15(7), 5712. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075712 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Verma, A., Bhattacharya, P., Madhani, N., Trivedi, C., Bhushan, B., Tanwar, S., Sharma, G., Bokoro, P. N., & Sharma, R. (2022). Blockchain for industry 5.0: Vision, opportunities, key enablers, and future directions. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3186892 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Wu, H., Liu, J., & Liang, B. (2025). AI‑driven supply chain transformation in industry 5.0: Enhancing resilience and sustainability. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 16, 3826–3868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01999-6 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Xu, X., Lu, Y., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Wang, L. (2021). Industry 4.0 and industry 5.0, inception, conception and perception. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 61, 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.10.006 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
- Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
- A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
- The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
- Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria