Assessing Sentience in Artificial Intelligence: A Structured Literature Review of Theories, Indicators, and Evaluation Frameworks (2020–2025)
Authors
Chief Executive Officer, Infomage Rims Group (South Africa)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200245
Subject Category: Social science
Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 3197-3210
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-11-10
Accepted: 2025-11-15
Published: 2026-01-14
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has evolved from a specialised field of computing into a vital part of how we generate knowledge, make decisions, and address ethical issues (OpenAI 2025). As these developments occur rapidly, progress in self-reflective and adaptive AI has amplified debates about whether machines can have consciousness in business, science, and academia. To provide clarity on navigating this complex area, this review looks at ways to detect signs of consciousness in artificial systems. Specifically, from 2020 to 2025, three primary trends have influenced research on artificial consciousness, establishing the context for this review.
Keywords
Artificial Consciousness; AI Sentience; Structured Literature Review
Downloads
References
1. Anthropic. (2025, August 15). Claude Opus 4 and 4.1 can now end a rare subset of conversations [Blog post]. Anthropic. Retrieved from https://www.anthropic.com/research/end-subset-conversations [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Baars, B.J. (1997). In the Theatre of Consciousness: The Workspace of the Mind. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Bender, E.M. and Koller, A. (2020). Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2020). Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 5185–5198. doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Birch, J. (2024). The Edge of Sentience: Animals, AI, and the Future of Consciousness. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Blum, L. & Blum, M. (2021). A Theory of Consciousness from a Theoretical Computer Science Perspective: Insights from the Conscious Turing Machine. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.13704. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Bryson, J.J. (2019). The Artificial Intelligence of the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: An Introductory Overview for Law and Regulation. Law, Innovation and Technology, 11(2), 171–197. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Butlin, P., Long, R., Elmoznino, E., Bengio, Y., Birch, J., Constant, A., Deane, G., Fleming, S.M., Frith, C., Ji, X., Kanai, R., Klein, C., Lindsay, G., Michel, M., Mudrik, L., Peters, M.A.K., Schwitzgebel, E., Simon, J., & VanRullen, R. (2023). Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08708. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Chalmers, D.J. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Chen, S., Yao, J., Zhang, Y. & Liu, Q. (2025). Exploring Consciousness in Large Language Models: A Systematic Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.19806. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. Clark, A. (2013). Whatever Next? Predictive Brains, Situated Agents, and the Future of Cognitive Science. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Crick, F. & Koch, C. (2003). A Framework for Consciousness. Nature Neuroscience, 6(2), 119–126. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. De Soto, F. & Coltheart, M. (2024). Anthropomorphism and the Illusion of AI Consciousness. Cognition, 250, 105312. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Dehaene, S. & Changeux, J.-P. (2011). Experimental and Theoretical Approaches to Conscious Processing. Neuron, 70(2), 200–227. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Dehaene, S., Charles, L., King, J.R. & Marti, S. (2021). Toward a Computational Theory of Consciousness. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 44, 97–121. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Dennett, D.C. (2018). From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds. Penguin Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Descartes, R. (1641). Meditations on First Philosophy. Paris. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
17. Downes, S.M. (2024). LLMs are Not Just Next Token Predictors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.04666. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
18. Edelman, G.M. & Tononi, G. (2000). A Universe of Consciousness: How Matter Becomes Imagination. Basic Books. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
19. Elamrani, A., Deliens, L. & Zemouri, R. (2025). Introduction to Artificial Consciousness: History, Current Trends and Ethical Challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.05823. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
20. European Commission. (2021). Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. Brussels: European Commission. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
21. Farisco, M., Sgaramella, T.M. & Evers, K. (2024). Is Artificial Consciousness Achievable? Neural Networks, 172, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
22. Findlay, G., Marshall, W., Albantakis, L., Mayner, W.G.P., Koch, C. & Tononi, G. (2024). Dissociating Artificial Intelligence from Artificial Consciousness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04571. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
23. Fleming, S.M. & Dolan, R.J. (2012). The Neural Basis of Metacognitive Ability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367(1594), 1338–1349. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
24. Floridi, L. & Cowls, J. (2022). A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society. Harvard Data Science Review, 4(1). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
25. Friston, K. (2010). The Free-Energy Principle: A Unified Brain Theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
26. Friston, K. & Seth, A.K. (2023). Consciousness and the Free-Energy Principle. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 24, 309–323. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
27. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. (2024). Design and Evaluation of a Global Workspace Agent Embodied in a Robotic Environment. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 11. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
28. Gazzaniga, M.S. (2024). The Consciousness Instinct: Unravelling the Mystery of How the Brain Makes the Mind. Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
29. Goldstein, S. & Kirk-Giannini, C. (2024). A Case for AI Consciousness: Language Agents and Global Workspace Theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.11407. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
30. Goosen, W. (2012). Contextual Awareness and Conscious Development. Pretoria: GRIN Verlag. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
31. Graziano, M.S.A. (2013). Consciousness and the Social Brain. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
32. Hohwy, J. (2021). The Predictive Mind Revisited. Synthese, 199(S1), 1–26. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
33. IEEE Standards Association. (2023). Ethically Aligned Design: A Vision for Prioritising Human Well-Being with Autonomous and Intelligent Systems (2nd ed.). New York: IEEE. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
34. Jobin, A., Ienca, M. & Vayena, E. (2019). The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
35. Lau, H. & Rosenthal, D. (2011). Empirical Support for Higher-Order Theories of Conscious Awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(8), 365–373. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
36. Mashour, G.A., Roelfsema, P., Changeux, J.-P. & Dehaene, S. (2020). Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis. Neuron, 105(5), 776–798. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
37. Oizumi, M., Albantakis, L. & Tononi, G. (2014). From the Phenomenology to the Mechanisms of Consciousness: Integrated Information Theory 3.0. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(5): e1003588. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
38. OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT (GPT-5) [Large language model]. Retrieved October 18, 2025, from https://chat.openai.com/ [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
39. Page, M.J. et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ, 372:n71. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
40. Pimenta, R.A., Schlippe, T. & Schaaff, K. (2025). Assessing Consciousness-Related Behaviours in Large Language Models Using the Maze Test. arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.16705. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
41. Rosenthal, D.M. (2005). Consciousness and Mind. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
42. Seth, A. & Bayne, T. (2022). Theories of Consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 23, 439–452. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
43. Tononi, G. (2008). Consciousness as Integrated Information: A Provisional Manifesto. Biological Bulletin, 215, 216–242. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
44. Tononi, G., Boly, M., Massimini, M. & Koch, C. (2016). Integrated Information Theory: From Consciousness to Its Physical Substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(7), 450–461. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
45. UNESCO. (2022). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Paris: UNESCO. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
46. Wang, Y. & Sun, M. (2025). Unable to Forget: Proactive Interference Reveals Working Memory Limits in LLMs Beyond Context Length. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08184. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
47. Webb, T.W. & Graziano, M.S.A. (2015). The Attention Schema Theory: A Mechanistic Account of Subjective Awareness. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 500. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
48. Wiese, W. (2022). Predictive processing and the construction of conscious experience. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 13(4), 707–734. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
- Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
- Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
- The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
- Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar