Bridging Learning Gaps in General Chemistry: Diagnostic Insights into Mastery and Self-Efficacy

This study aimed to develop a validated, standardized assessment tool to identify the least mastered competencies in the topic of Solutions in General Chemistry and to examine the self-efficacy of Grade 12 learners across multiple academic strands, including STEM, ABM, HUMSS, ICT, and TVL. Employing a quantitative research design with qualitative support, the study collected quantitative data through the researcher-developed assessment instrument and qualitative data via an open-ended self-efficacy questionnaire, which was analyzed thematically. The assessment tool underwent expert validation, readability testing, pilot testing, item analysis, and reliability evaluation. From an initial 50-item test, 37 items were retained in the final version, which demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.80). Results indicated that learners’ overall mastery was generally low, with most students scoring below 50% of the total score. All five learning areas—solubility rules, factors affecting solubility, concentration units, colligative properties, and colloids and emulsions—were classified as least mastered or not mastered, with the lowest performance observed in factors affecting solubility and concentration units. Qualitative findings revealed that self-efficacy was highly variable and influenced by topic difficulty, clarity of instruction, and available learning support. Mathematical complexity, abstract concepts, and cognitive load negatively affected confidence, whereas persistence, self-regulated learning strategies, peer collaboration, and supportive teaching practices enhanced learners’ self-efficacy. Overall, the study highlights significant cognitive and affective challenges in General Chemistry and underscores the value of diagnostic assessments and innovative, learner-centered instructional approaches. Future research may investigate the efficacy of strategies such as chemistry-based games, simulations, tactile learning, and collaborative activities to improve mastery and self-efficacy.

Chemistry Competencies, Mastery Level, Self-efficacy, Solutions

1. Bandura, A. (2018). A commentary on moral disengagement: The role of social cognition. Journal of Moral Education, 47(2), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2017.1412512 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bandura, A. (2020). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619899462 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Britner, S. L., & Pajares, F. (2016). Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 953–973. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21331 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Classroom assessment and educational measurement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315166938 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Castro, R. (2025). The effects of chemistry virtual laboratories on academic achievement of secondary level learners: A meta-analysis. Integrated Science Education Journal, 6(1), 24–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Cooper, M. M., & Klymkowsky, M. W. (2020). Chemistry, life, the universe, and everything: A new approach to general chemistry and a model for curriculum reform. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2916–2924. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01008 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Cooper, M. M., Underwood, S. M., & Hilley, C. Z. (2021). Development and validation of the general chemistry diagnostic. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dede, C. (2022). The role of digital technologies in deeper learning. Educational Technology, 62(1), 11–17. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. DeVellis, R. F. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dela Mines, R., & Cajucom, E. (2022). An evaluation of proposed General Chemistry learning modules by experts and teachers. International Journal of Chemistry Education Research, 6(2), 108–116. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2023). Gamification in education: Where are we in 2023? Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 1045–1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10141-3 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Ferrell, B., Phillips, M. M., & Barbera, J. (2021). Connecting achievement motivation to student engagement in general chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(5), 1567–1576. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01234 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Gabel, D. (2017). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00788 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Honicke, T., & Broadbent, J. (2016). The influence of academic self-efficacy on academic performance: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 17, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.11.002 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Honicke, T., Broadbent, J., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2022). Learner self-efficacy, engagement, and achievement in higher education. Educational Psychology, 42(6), 678–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1934379 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Johnstone, A. H. (2015). You can’t get there from here. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed500775u [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Nakhleh, M. B. (2017). Why some students don’t learn chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00660 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2014). Educational assessment of students (6th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. OECD. (2021). Beyond academic learning: First results from the survey of social and emotional skills. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/92a11084-en [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Orgill, M., Flynn, A. B., & Bodner, G. M. (2019). What do logical positivism and learning progressions have to do with chemistry education research? Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00621 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Prince, M. (2014). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Reyes, R. L. (2025). Integrating real-world problems into chemistry curricula: Enhancing relevance and student engagement. Forum for Education Studies, 3(2). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 77–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Sayre, J., Nabua, E., Salic-Hairulla, M., Alcopra, A., & Fernandez, M. J. (2025). Assessing general chemistry learning gaps: A needs assessment of competency mastery among Grade 11 learners. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Schunk, D. H. (2016). Learning theories: An educational perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Sirhan, G. (2017). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(1), 3–20. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Sombria, K. J. F., Celestial, D. L., Jalagat, C. G. M., & Valdez, A. G. (2021). Online learning through Google Classroom: Effects on students’ critical thinking skills in chemistry. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Taber, K. S. (2015). Learning chemistry: A critical review of research in chemical education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-8040-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Taber, K. S. (2022). Chemical misconceptions: Prevention, diagnosis and cure (2nd ed.). Royal Society of Chemistry. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Poblete, T. C., Nabua, E. B., Abdurahman, M. M., Navalta, E. R., & Micutuan, R. P. G. (2025). Grade 11 STEM learners’ learning competencies and their motivation in General Chemistry. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(01), 3763–3774. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9010294 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. Towns, M. H., Raker, J. R., & Becker, N. M. (2020). Learning progressions and assessment in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(2), 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00924 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2016). Sources of self-efficacy in school: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 475–526. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316629227 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Butz, A. R., & Rojas, J. P. (2020). Sources of science self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(6), 887–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21604 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Vega, S. G. S. (2024). Trends in chemistry education research on student transformation in the Philippines: A meta-analytic review. International Journal of Instruction, 17(4), 693–718. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Impact of Ownership Structure on Dividend Payout Policy of Listed Plantation Companies in Sri Lanka
• Urban Sustainability in North-East India: A Study through the lens of NER-SDG index
• Performance Assessment of Predictive Forecasting Techniques for Enhancing Hospital Supply Chain Efficiency in Healthcare Logistics
• The Fractured Self in Julian Barnes' Postmodern Fiction: Identity Crisis and Deflation in Metroland and the Sense of an Ending
• Impact of Flood on the Employment, Labour Productivity and Migration of Agricultural Labour in North Bihar