Empowering Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior: The Mediating Roles of Psychological Empowerment and Knowledge Sharing in Sri Lankan MEP Sector Organizations

This study extensively investigates the ways in which empowering leadership (EL) influences employees’ innovative work behavior (IWB) within Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP) organizations operating in Sri Lanka, with particular attention to the mediating roles of psychological empowerment (PE) and knowledge sharing (KS). Grounded in Social Exchange Theory, the research posits that leaders who exhibit empowering behaviors such as encouraging employee autonomy, participative decision-making, competence development, and confidence building create an organizational environment in which employees feel motivated to reciprocate through heightened engagement in creative and innovative activities. To empirically test these relationships, a comprehensive quantitative cross-sectional survey was conducted among employees working in selected MEP firms located in Colombo, capturing perspectives from various hierarchical levels, including engineers, technicians, supervisors, and administrative personnel. The results of the analysis indicate a statistically significant positive relationship between EL and IWB, demonstrating that employees exposed to empowering leadership are more likely to generate, promote, and implement new ideas effectively within their work settings. In addition, the findings reveal that both psychological empowerment and knowledge sharing partially mediate this relationship, suggesting that the influence of leadership on innovative behavior is not purely direct but also operates through enhancing employees’ perceptions of meaningful work, personal competence, autonomy in decision-making, and collaborative knowledge exchange. By exploring these psychological and social mechanisms, this study fills a critical theoretical and empirical gap in the context of Sri Lanka’s engineering-intensive MEP sector, offering valuable insights for organizational leaders and practitioners seeking to develop leadership competencies, improve knowledge-management practices, and implement HR systems that foster a sustainable innovation-oriented organizational culture.

leadership competencies, improve knowledge-management practices, and implement HR systems

1. Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945–955. PubMed Central+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249–269. Studocu+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471–482. 5dok.net+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Lee, C., Lee, J., & Lee, K. (2019). Empowering leadership and innovative work behavior: A study of knowledge-intensive organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(5), 899– 918. igbr.org+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(1), 106–129. 5dok.net+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Pearce, C. L., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(2), 172–197. 5dok.net+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239–1251. ResearchGate+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Spreitzer, G. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465. Studocu+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666– [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. 681. 5dok.net+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Vecchio, R. P., Justin, J. E., & Pearce, C. L. (2010). Empowering leadership: An examination of mediators and moderators. Group & Organization Management, 35(3), 367–399. ScienceDirect+1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115–131 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• The Indirect Effect of Liquidity and Activity on Company Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable
• Effect of Financial Skills, Knowledge, and Attitude on The Financial Behaviour of Clergy
• A Decade of Review: Trends in Budget Execution and Financial Performance of Development Projects in Tanzania (2014/15-2023/24)
• The Influence of Pre-Project Planning on the Budget Absorption Rate of Public Funded Infrastructure Projects in Kenya a Comparative Case Study of Narok, Migori, and Kisii County Government Projects
• Assessment of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation in Hotels’ Facility Management in Abuja Metropolis, Nigeria