A Conceptual Framework for Measuring the Social Return on Investment (SROI) for Affordable Housings in Malaysia
Authors
School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor (Malaysia)
School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor; Institute of Tropical Agriculture & Food Security (ITAFoS), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor (Malaysia)
School of Business and Economics, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor (Malaysia)
Faculty of Design and Architecture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor (Malaysia)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1015EC00003
Subject Category: Economics
Volume/Issue: 10/15 | Page No: 26-31
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2025-12-28
Accepted: 2026-01-03
Published: 2026-01-15
Abstract
The benefits of affordable housing extend beyond the number of units built or households housed. The most significant difficulty in the assessment of affordable housing is to measure the cultural, social, and environmental impacts which are often considered 'intangible' and sometimes overlooked. This research involved a literature review, analysis of existing SROI studies of affordable housing, and construction of a Framework for determining the SROI for investments in affordable housing. This paper provides a proposed framework for using the Social Return on Investment (SROI) as a viable way to demonstrate the impact of government spending on housing by attaching a monetary value to the benefits housing brings to residents, housing providers, and the local economy.
Keywords
Public Housing, Project Appraisal
Downloads
References
1. Besar, J. A., Yusof, A. R. M., Rosniza Aznie, C. R., Lyndon, N., & Zulkipli, A. A. (2018). Socio-Economic Impact of Program Perumahan Rakyat (PPR) Padang Hiliran, Terengganu, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(13 Special Issue: Community Development & Social Mobility), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i13/4814 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Bottero, M., Ambrosini, G., & Callegari, G. (2017). Valuing the impact of social housing renovation programs: An application of the Social Return on Investment (SROI). Green Energy and Technology, (9783319496757), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49676-4_22 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Carlson, D., Haveman, R., Kaplan, T., & Wolfe, B. (2009). The Benefits and Costs of the Section 8 Housing Subsidy Program: A Framework and First-Year Estimates Deven. (4). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Hanemann, W Michael. 1994. "Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8 (4): 19-43. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Ibem, E. O., Anosike, M. N., & Azuh, D. E. (2011). Challenges in public housing provision in the post independence era in Nigeria. Journal of Human Sciences, 8(2), 421-443. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. J. Mott Lin, "Cost-benefit Analysis: A Primer", The Bottom Line, 23(1), 31-36 (2010) Hashim, A. E., Samikon, S. A., Nasir, N. M., & Ismail, N. (2012). Assessing Factors Influencing Performance of Malaysian Low-Cost Public Housing in Sustainable Environment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50(July), 920–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.093 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Ministry of Economic Affairs. (2019). Creativity Index. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Mohit, M. A., & Nazyddah, N. (2011). Social housing programme of Selangor Zakat Board of Malaysia and housing satisfaction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 26(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-011-9216-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. NHD. (2019). Laporan penilaian outcome: (September). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. NHD. (2020). Maklumat Peruntukan JPN. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. Nur, S., Abd, A., Khalil, N., & Isa, H. M. (2019). Monetary and Non-Monetary Indicators of Cost-Benefit Analysis in Industrialised Building System Project : An Initial Conceptual Model. 3. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. Nyborg, Karine, (2014), Project evaluation with democratic decision-making: What does cost–benefit analysis really measure?, Ecological Economics, 106, issue C, p. 124-131, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:106:y:2014:i:c:p:124-131. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
13. Paridah, M. T., Abdelrhman, A., & Shahwahid, M. (2017). Cost Benefit Analysis of Kenaf Cultivation for Producing Fiber in Malaysia. Arab. J. Bus. Manag. Rev, 7(5). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
14. Ravi, A., & Reinhardt, C. (2011). The Social Value of Community Housing in Australia. (August). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
15. Thomson, G., Yates, J., Myers, M., & Thomson, G. (2016). Valuing Social Housing : Progress Report 2. (October), 1–13. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
16. Whitehead, John & Blomquist, Glenn. (2006). The Use of Contingent Valuation in Benefit-Cost Analysis. Handbook on Contingent Valuation. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
- Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
- Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
- Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
- Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria