Perceptions on the Utilization of Self-Learning Modules (SLMs) and their Academic Performance Ensuring Educational Continuity in Times of Disasters

Authors

Nielma May D. Omo

Master of Science Teaching- Biology Student, Davao del Norte State College (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200274

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 3572-3581

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-20

Accepted: 2025-12-25

Published: 2026-01-15

Abstract

This study assessed students' perceptions of Science 10 Self-Learning Modules (SLMs) and their academic performance as a means of ensuring educational continuity during disasters. Utilizing a descriptive-correlational research design, the study involved 60 Grade 10 students from Lorenzo Latawan National High School, selected through purposive sampling for the 2025-2026 school year. Data were collected via survey questionnaires using the Likert scale for scoring, focusing on five key indicators: access and availability, clarity and quality of content, self-directed learning, learning continuity, and challenges faced. Results indicated that SLM utilization was perceived as "Moderately Implemented" across most areas, with Access and Availability receiving the highest mean score (4.26), Clarity and Content (4.25) Challenges Faced receiving the lowest (3.76), interpreted as "Slightly Implemented". Academic performance showed that the majority of students achieved satisfactory (43.33%) or Very Satisfactory (28.33%) grades, confirming basic continuity. The inferential analysis using Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient (ρ) revealed no statistically significant relationship between students' perceptions of SLM utilization and their academic performance (all ρ>0.05). The study concludes that while SLMs meet basic standards of equality, their perceived quality does not serve as a reliable predictor of student success. Recommendations focus on shifting interventions from module revision to comprehensive home-based support and the explicit teaching of Self-Regulated Learning (SRL), as these contextual factors appear to be true drivers of academic success.

Keywords

Self-Learning Modules, Educational Continuity, Academic Performance

Downloads

References

1. Adedoyin, O.B., & Soykan, E. (2020). COVID-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Education and Information Technologies, 25(5), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10376-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Alicabo, M.S., & Cacharo, A.A. (2025). Assessing the Effectiveness of Self-Learning Modules to Ensure Educational Continuity During Calamities. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 42(8), 1152–1163. https://ejournals.ph/article.php?id=30139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing Course: Ten Years of Tracking Online Education in the United States. Babson Survey Research Group. https://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/changingcourse.pdf [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Alinsunurin, A.J., Catubay, L.T., & Ocampo, J. (2021). Effectiveness of Self-Learning Modules in Teaching and Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Philippines. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 11, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Alon, J., Reyes, M., & Cruz, L. (2022). Effectiveness of Self-Learning Modules (SLMs) in Improving the Academic Performance of Grade III Pupils. Paper Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Alonzo, A., Santos, J., & Ramos, R. (2021). The Impact of Self-Learning Modules on Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Choi, J. J., et al. (2020). Strategies for distance learning in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 89-105. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Dargo, J., & Abate, A. (2021). Challenges of Modular Teaching: The Case of Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 9(1), 121-128. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Department of Education (2020). DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2020: Adoption of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan. https://www.deped.gov.ph [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Dulay, M.A.B., & Manuel, S.K.J. (2021). Emergency remote teaching experience: Challenges, actions and suggested measures of STEM research teachers in Pangasinan, Philippines. International Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management, 1(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5726572 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Kerlinger, F. N., & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing Company. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. New York: Association Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Malipot, M. H. (2020). DepEd ensures quality of self-learning modules. Manila Bulletin. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Magsambol, B. (2020). Distance learning in the Philippines: A continuous challenge for educators and students. Rappler News. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2006). Academic resilience and its protective and risk factors in the sixteenth form. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 479-495. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2021). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 1-16. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. UNESCO. (2021). Ensuring effective distance learning during COVID-19 disruption: Guidance for teachers. UNESCO Digital Library. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles