Mastery Gaps in Acid-Base: A Need Assessment of Grade 12 Senior High School Students

Authors

Cathniel L. Verallo

Mindanao State University Iligan Institute of technology, Iligan City (Philippines)

Edna B. Nabua

Mindanao State University Iligan Institute of technology, Iligan City (Philippines)

Christine Joy C. Llaneras

Mindanao State University Iligan Institute of technology, Iligan City (Philippines)

Cheira M. Tarayao

Mindanao State University Iligan Institute of technology, Iligan City (Philippines)

Article Information

DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.91200280

Subject Category: Social science

Volume/Issue: 9/12 | Page No: 3630-3635

Publication Timeline

Submitted: 2025-12-24

Accepted: 2025-12-29

Published: 2026-01-15

Abstract

Acid–base chemistry is a foundational topic in senior high school curricula, underpinning advanced concepts in chemical reactions, equilibria, and analytical applications. Despite its importance, learners frequently exhibit difficulties in understanding and applying acid–base principles, particularly in computational and conceptual contexts. This study aimed to assess the level of mastery of Grade 12 students in acids and bases and to identify the least mastered competencies through a comprehensive needs assessment. Data were collected from fifty (50) purposively selected students at Kapatagan National High School using a 30-item validated multiple-choice diagnostic test aligned with the Department of Education’s Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs). Descriptive quantitative analyses, including mean scores, standard deviations, and mastery level interpretations, were employed to evaluate performance. Results indicated that the overall performance of learners was low, with 92% failing to meet expectations and only 8% achieving a fairly satisfactory level. Learners demonstrated Low Mastery in fundamental definitions of Arrhenius, Brønsted–Lowry, and Lewis acids and bases (MPS = 77.5), while application- and computation-based competencies, including buffer systems, Henderson–Hasselbalch calculations, and salt hydrolysis, were identified as least mastered (MPS = 51.0–57.4). These findings reveal substantial gaps in conceptual understanding and quantitative application, highlighting the need for targeted instructional interventions, guided problem-solving, and enhanced conceptual discussions. The study provides empirical evidence to inform curriculum development and pedagogical strategies aimed at improving mastery in acid–base chemistry.

Keywords

acid–base, conceptual understanding, chemistry education

Downloads

References

1. Alonzo, D. R., & De Guzman, P. R. (2019). Students’ conceptual understanding of acids and bases. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 87–96. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Bautista, K. L., & Ramos, C. E. (2021). Analysis of MELCs implementation in senior high school chemistry. Journal of Curriculum Studies in Asia, 4(2), 21–33. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Bradley, J. D., & Mosimege, M. D. (1998). Misconceptions in acids and bases: A comparative study of student teachers. South African Journal of Chemistry, 51, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. Ceballos, J. M., Duminding, A. D., Ongcol, M. E., & Rodriguez, F. A. G. (2025). Engaging STEM students through guided inquiry: A validated laboratory worksheet for acids and bases. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(2), 127–133. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Cruz, J. M., & Velasco, E. T. (2023). Mastery level of chemistry competencies among STEM learners. Journal of STEM Education Research Philippines, 3(1), 10–22. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Damanhuri, M. I. M., Treagust, D. F., Won, M., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2016). High school students’ understanding of acid–base concepts. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(4), 697–721. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. DepEd. (2023). Learning competency analysis report in science. Department of Education, Philippines. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. Dizon, A. P. (2020). Difficulty level of chemistry topics among senior high school students. International Journal of Education and Research, 8(6), 55–64. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Flores, J. A., & Bautista, R. J. (2023). Diagnostic assessment of chemistry competencies in senior high schools. Journal of Science Education Research Philippines, 5(2), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Garcia, H. A. (2024). Factors affecting mastery of chemistry competencies among Grade 12 students. International Journal of Educational Studies, 11(1), 66–78. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Gonen, S., & Kocakaya, S. (2010). Students’ misconceptions about acid–base concepts. International Journal of Chemistry Education, 2(1), 45–54 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Habiddin, H., Akbar, D. F. K., Husniah, I., & Luna, P. (2022). Uncovering students’ understanding of acid–base properties of salt solutions. Journal of Chemical Education Research, 9(3), 201–214. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Kind, V. (2019). Students’ thinking about acids, bases and neutralisation. Royal Society of Chemistry. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Kumar, S. (2024). Misconceptions in acid–base chemistry: Diagnostic assessment and instructional intervention. International Journal of Applied and Behavioral Sciences, 6(1), 22–35. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. Matchete, J. A. (2001). Teaching chemistry in Philippine secondary schools: Issues and challenges. Journal of Asian Research in Science and Society, 3(1), 45–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Mendoza, A. F. (2020). Performance-based assessment in chemistry education. Philippine Journal of Educational Measurement, 2(1), 40–52. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Reyes, M. P., & Aquino, L. S. (2022). Students’ achievement and misconceptions in acid–base chemistry. Philippine Social Science Journal, 5(1), 98–109. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. Simbajon, J. S., & Adlaon, M. S. (2024). Learning gaps and proficiency levels in science specialize subjects of senior high school students. International Journal of Research, 12(4), 89–102. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Soriano, R. T., & Caballes, D. G. (2022). Least mastered competencies in senior high school chemistry. Philippine Journal of Science Education, 6(1), 15–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. Villanueva, R. M., & Lagrada, M. L. (2021). Students’ misconceptions in acids and bases among STEM learners. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 9(3), 34–42. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

Metrics

Views & Downloads

Similar Articles