Happiness-Income Relationship: A Cross-Country Comparison
Authors
Asstt. Professor, Department of Economics, MLSU, Udaipur (Rajasthan) (India)
Research Scholar, Department of Economics, MLSU, Udaipur, (Rajasthan) (India)
Article Information
DOI: 10.47772/IJRISS.2026.1015EC00004
Subject Category: Economics
Volume/Issue: 10/15 | Page No: 32-41
Publication Timeline
Submitted: 2026-01-01
Accepted: 2026-01-07
Published: 2026-01-16
Abstract
The link between happiness and income has been widely studied, yet countries show different patterns as they grow. Higher income often improves people’s lives, but many findings also show that happiness does not rise at the same pace in richer nations. These varied results are often highlighted in debates like the Easterlin Paradox, which suggests that while happiness rises with income in the short run, it tends to stop increasing significantly, as countries move to higher income levels. This study examines the complex relationship between the income and happiness across 15 countries using data from the World Value Survey (1990-2022) and World Happiness Report (2012-2024). The research covers the time span of a 34-year period (1990-2024). The study applies linear regression models to analyse interlinkages between income and happiness for selected countries. The findings validate the Easterlin Paradox, demonstrating that the income significantly influences happiness in developing economies, while its effect shows diminishing nature in economically developed nations. The study reveals that high-income countries experience happiness saturation, where additional income growth contributes to minimal well-being gains, while middle and lower-income countries continue experiencing positive happiness trends which are tied to economic growth. These findings have significant implications for policymaking which further suggests that development strategies should evolve from income-centric approaches in emerging economies to major well-being frameworks in advanced nations, ensuring institutional quality, social trust, and economic security alongside income growth.
Keywords
Easterlin Paradox, Happiness-Income
Downloads
References
1. Brickman, P., & Campbell, D. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In M. H. Appley (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory (pp. 287–302). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
2. Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61(3), 359–381. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
3. Clark, A. E., Frijters, P., & Shields, M. A. (2008). Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(1), 95–144. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
4. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305–314. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
5. Easterlin, R. (1974). Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? In Paul A. David and Melvin W. Reder (eds.), Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honor of Moses Abramovitz. New York: Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
6. Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). Academic Press. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
7. Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J., De Neve, J. E., Aknin, L., & Wang, S. (2023). World Happiness Report 2023. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
8. Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional wellbeing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(38), 16489-16493. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
9. Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Diener, E. (2018). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 29(5), 755–763. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
10. World Bank (2024). World Bank Country and Lending Groups. Washington, DC: The World Bank. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
11. World Happiness Report (2024). World Happiness Report 2024. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
12. World Value Survey (2022). World Value Survey 1981-2022 Integrated File. Madrid: ASEP/JDS. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]
Metrics
Views & Downloads
Similar Articles
- Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in India
- Issues Involved in Digitalisation Special Reference to Indian Tourism Growth
- Relationship Marketing and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) Industry in Nairobi County
- Financial Literacy or Financial Inclusion? Which is Which, What is What—To Achieve Uganda’s 10-Fold Economic Growth By 2040
- Harnessing Natural Gas for Economic Transformation: Overcoming the Regulatory and Infrastructural Bottlenecks in Nigeria