Understanding Resettlement Success across Context: A Thematic Review

Displaced individuals often find themselves detached from their communities, socioeconomic resources, and cultural values. Displacement is commonly brought about by the absence of thorough resettlement frameworks that can promote fairness and influence the livelihoods of these individuals. Previous research contended that mere legislation is insufficient to protect people’s welfare and livelihood, and there is an urgent requirement to transition from well-intentioned laws to effective practices. Therefore, this paper aims to assess and examine the elements that affect resettlement results and influence resettlement success in studies conducted between the years 2020 and 2024. A thematic analysis was conducted on relevant literature published between the years 2020 and 2024. The results showed that there are five (5) factors influencing resettlement success and community livelihood: (1) governance and policy framework; (2) community and social dynamic; (3) economic and livelihood consideration; (4) infrastructure and physical environment; and (5) education and long-term support. These findings highlighted that resettlement is not merely a logistical challenge but a profoundly social, economic, and cultural issue.

Resettlement; sustainable livelihood; community adaptation; forced displacement; thematic review.

1. Aboda, C., Vedeld, P. O., Byakagaba, P., Lein, H., & Nakakaawa, C. A. (2023). Household capacity to adapt to resettlement due to land acquisition for the oil refinery development project in Uganda. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(11), 13125–13147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02607-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

2. Ahmad, D., Afzal, M., & Ishaq, M. (2024). Impacts of riverbank erosion and flooding on communities along the Indus River, Pakistan. Natural Hazards, 120(1), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-023-06216-2 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

3. Ali, S., Yuefang, D., Bilal, H., & Ramsey, T. (2022). From displacement to resettlement: the stakeholders strategies to mitigate impoverishment risks of the Ghazi Barotha Hydropower Project Pakistan. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 40(4), 305–319. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

4. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2022.2080490 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

5. Aronsson, I.-L., & Price, S. (2024). Culture, heritage, memory: toward a resonant cultural solution for resettlement. Human Organization. https://doi.org/10.1080/00187259.2024.2307845 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

6. Azfa, A., Jackson, G., Westoby, R., McNamara, K. E., McMichael, C., & Farbotko, C. (2022). ‘We didn’t want to leave our island’: stories of involuntary resettlement from Gaadhoo Island, Maldives. Territory, Politics, Governance, 10(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1768139 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

7. Bergmann, J. (2021). Planned relocation in Peru: advancing from well-meant legislation to good practice. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 11(3), 365–375. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-021-00699-w [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

9. Blake, D. J. H., & Barney, K. (2022). Impounded rivers, compounded injustice: contesting the social impacts of hydraulic development in Laos. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 38(1), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2021.1920373 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

10. Chen, X., Vanclay, F., & Yu, J. (2021). Evaluating Chinese policy on post-resettlement support for dam-induced displacement and resettlement. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 39(5), 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2020.1771051 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

11. Cheo, R., Han, T., Huang, K., & Li, J. (2022). Prosocial village leaders and the resettlement outcomes of land-lost farmers: evidence from Qingdao, China. Applied Economics, 54(29), 3353–3372. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.2008298 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

12. Chipenda, C. (2024). Revisiting Enduring Labour Questions and Social Reproduction Dynamics in Rural Zimbabwe’s Post Land Reform Context: Implications on Citizen Welfare and Wellbeing. International Journal of Community Well-Being, 7(1), 87–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-023-00202-z [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

13. Collado, J. R. N., & Potangaroa, R. (2023). (Re)constructing (re)settlement: risk reduction and urban development negotiations in Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. International Development Planning Review, 45(2), 203–233. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2022.10 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

14. Haile, F. (2024). Displaced for housing: analysing the uneven outcomes of the Addis Ababa Integrated Housing Development Program. Urban Geography, 45(1), 6–12. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2023.2227511 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

16. Hanapi, N. A., Ridzwan, N. F., & Keane, A. (2023). Dynamism of Building Standards & Designs to Private Developers Towards Urban Poor Low-Cost Resettlement Quality of Life: A Review Comparison in Malaysia & Singapore. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 14(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.30880/ijscet.2023.14.03.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

17. Haque, C. E., & Jakariya, M. (2023). Bengal Delta, Charland Formation, and Riparian Hazards: Why Is a Flexible Planning Approach Needed for Deltaic Systems? Water (Switzerland), 15(13). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

18. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132373 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

19. Hosseini, Z., Syed, H., Raza, Z., Mansouri, M., Magan, I. M., & Awaad, R. (2024). A Systematic Review of Evidence-Based Interventions for Afghan Refugee Mental Health: A Cultural Adaptation Analysis. JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 55(1), 25–46. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221231213884 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

21. Hyndman, J. (2022). Geo-scripts and refugee resettlement in Canada: Designations and destinations. Canadian Geographer, 66(4), 653–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12785 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

22. Jain, G., & Bazaz, A. B. (2020). A multi-scalar approach for assessing costs and benefits of risk reduction alternatives for the people and the city: Cases of three resettlements in Visakhapatnam, India. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12155958 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

23. Janzen, R., Taylor, M., & Gokiert, R. (2022). Life Beyond Refuge: A System Theory of Change for Supporting Refugee Newcomers. Refuge, 38(2). https://doi.org/10.25071/1920-7336.40892 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

24. Jensen, S., Hapal, K., & Quijano, S. (2020). Reconfiguring Manila: Displacement, Resettlement, and the Productivity of Urban Divides. Urban Forum, 31(3), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-020-09399-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

25. Johansson, L. (2020). Generating hope through activity: Resilience among urban refugees in Eastleigh, Nairobi. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.53228/njas.v29i2.521 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

26. Kita, S. M. (2017). Urban vulnerability, disaster risk reduction and resettlement in Mzuzu city, Malawi. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 22, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.010 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

28. Lindegaard, L. S. (2020). Lessons from climate-related planned relocations: the case of Vietnam. Climate and Development, 12(7), 600–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1664973 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

29. Ma, L., Zhang, Y., Li, T., Zhao, S., & Yi, J. (2024). Livelihood capitals and livelihood resilience: Understanding the linkages in China’s government-led poverty alleviation resettlement. Habitat International, 147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103057 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

30. Manduna, K. (2023). Are mining-induced displacement and resettlement losses compensable? Evidence and lessons from mining communities in Zimbabwe. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY, 15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2023.101281 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

31. Marlowe, J., Malihi, A. Z., Milne, B., McLay, J., & Chiang, A. (2024). Settlement trajectories of nearly 25,000 forced migrants in New Zealand: longitudinal insights from administrative data. Kotuitui, 19(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2023.2214606 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

32. Marx, C., Johnson, C., & Lwasa, S. (2020). Multiple interests in urban land: disaster-induced land resettlement politics in Kampala. International Planning Studies, 25(3), 289–301. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2020.1734445 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

34. Mayer, A., Castro-Diaz, L., Lopez, M. C., Leturcq, G., & Moran, E. F. (2021). Is hydropower worth it? Exploring amazonian resettlement, human development and environmental costs with the Belo Monte project in Brazil. Energy Research & Social Science, 78, 102129. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102129 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

36. Miller, E., Ziaian, T., Baak, M., & de Anstiss, H. (2024). Recognition of refugee students’ cultural wealth and social capital in resettlement. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(5), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1946723 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

37. Miller, F., Ha, T. T. P., Da, H. Van, Thuy, N. T. T., & Ngo, B. H. (2022). Double displacement – Interactions between resettlement, environmental change and migration. Geoforum, 129, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.12.016 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

39. Nel, A., & Mabhena, C. (2021). Echoes From the Rocks: Contextualising Land Reform and Resettled Farmer Experiences in Matabeleland, Zimbabwe. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 56(4), 818–835. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620943630 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

40. Otsuki, K. (2023). Contested values of development: Experiencing commodification of livelihoods through displacement and resettlement in Mozambique. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X231182431 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

41. Parvin, A., Hakim, S. S., & Islam, M. A. (2022). Policy, design, and way of life in resettlement projects: The case of Ashrayan, Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 77, 103073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103073 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

42. Qiu, J., Liu, Y., Xian, S., Song, L., & Ru, X. (2020). ‘Plural Reciprocity’ vs. ‘Acquaintance Society’: Place Attachment and Residential Satisfaction under Development-Induced Resettlement Differences in Guangzhou, China. Sustainability, 12(16), 6444. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166444 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

43. Raden, R., Baiquni, M., Rachmawati, R., & Azis, M. (2022). Relocations of the households affected by the development of the New Yogyakarta International Airport, Indonesia: problems and livelihood prospects. HUMAN GEOGRAPHIES – JOURNAL OF STUDIES AND RESEARCH IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5719/hgeo.2022.162.5 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

44. Ratnayake, R., & Disanayake, H. (2018). Psychological Risks of Resettlers in Resettlement Planning: A Study in Moragahakanda Resettlement Project (MRP). [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

45. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201801.0278.v1 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

46. Rickard, S. (2020). Gender, agency and decision making in community engagement: Reflections from Afghanistan’s Mes Aynak Mine. Extractive Industries and Society, 7(2), 435–445. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2019.11.001 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

48. Sahoo, U., & Jojo, B. (2020). Examining Displacement, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Processes: The Case of Rengali Dam Displaced Communities in Odisha, India* An earlier version of this article, titled—‘Why Development Brought Vulnerability for Them? A Situational Analysis of Resett. International Journal of Community and Social Development, 2(1), 29–50. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

49. https://doi.org/10.1177/2516602620908971 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

50. Samah, W. T. (2022). THE JUBA PEACE AGREEMENT AND THE PROTECTION OF DISPLACED PERSONS: Between Regional Migratory Routes and IDP Camps. African Conflict and Peacebuilding Review, 12(2), 106–132. https://doi.org/10.2979/africonfpeacrevi.12.2.07 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

51. See, J., & Wilmsen, B. (2020). Just adaptation? Generating new vulnerabilities and shaping adaptive capacities through the politics of climate-related resettlement in a Philippine coastal city. Global Environmental Change, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102188 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

52. Sharp, K., Zerriffi, H., & Le Billon, P. (2020). Land scarcity, resettlement and food security: Assessing the effect of voluntary resettlement on diet quality in Malawi. Food Security, 12(1), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-019-00979-y [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

53. Simich, L., Este, D., & Hamilton, H. (2010). Meanings of home and mental well-being among Sudanese refugees in Canada. Ethnicity & Health, 15(2), 199–212. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

54. Singto, C., de Vries, M., Hofstede, G. J., & Fleskens, L. (2021). Ex Ante Impact Assessment of Reservoir Construction Projects for Different Stakeholders Using Agent-Based Modeling. Water Resources Management, 35(3), 1047–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02771-0 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

55. Siriwardhana, S. D., Kulatunga, U., Samaraweera, A., & Shanika, V. G. (2021). Cultural issues of community resettlement in Post-Disaster Reconstruction projects in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 53, 102017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.102017 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

56. Sridarran, P., Keraminiyage, K., & Fernando, N. (2018). Acceptance to Be the Host of a Resettlement Programme: A Literature Review. Procedia Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.124 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

57. Strauss, S. (2016). Global Models, Local Risks: Responding to Climate Change in the Swiss Alps. In Anthropology and climate change (pp. 166–174). Routledge. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

58. Su, M. M., Wall, G., & Jin, M. (2016). Island livelihoods: Tourism and fishing at Long Islands, Shandong Province, China. Ocean and Coastal Management, 122, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.11.014 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

60. Sun, H., Li, X., Duan, Y., & Zhang, N. (2023). Benefit sharing model of hydropower development based on input perspective: a case study of Xiluodu project in China. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1174602 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

61. Thiyagarajan, J. S., & Khudrathullah Iqbal, S. A. K. (2020). Improving Economic Conditions of Project-Affected People: Case Study on Resettlement and Rehabilitation. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000370 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

62. Ty, P. H. (2023). Long-term outcomes of the livelihoods of displaced households after hydropower dam construction: A case study in Thua Thien Hue Province, Vietnam. Environmental and Socio-Economic Studies, 11(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2478/environ-2023-0007 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

63. Uwayezu, E., & T. de Vries, W. (2020). Can In-Kind Compensation for Expropriated Real Property Promote Spatial Justice? A Case Study Analysis of Resettlement in Kigali City, Rwanda. Sustainability, 12(9), 3753. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093753 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

64. Vanclay, F. (2017). Project-induced displacement and resettlement: from impoverishment risks to an opportunity for development? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 35(1), 3–21. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2017.1278671 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

66. Wang, H.-C. (2023). Examining the impact of in-situ infrastructural upgrading on sustainability in informal settlements: The case of Accra, Ghana. Journal of Urban Affairs, 45(3), 665–684. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

67. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2022.2090371 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

68. Wayessa, G. O., & Nygren, A. (2023). Mixed Methods Research in Global Development Studies: State-Sponsored Resettlement Schemes in Ethiopia. The European Journal of Development Research, 35(6), 1440–1464. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-023-00588-8 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

69. Widyaningsih, A., & Van den Broeck, P. (2021). Social innovation in times of flood and eviction crisis: The making and unmaking of homes in the Ciliwung riverbank, Jakarta. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 42(2), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12370 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

70. Yang, X., Li, X., Lu, K., & Peng, Z.-R. (2023). Integrating rural livelihood resilience and sustainability for post-disaster community relocation: a theoretical framework and empirical study. Natural Hazards, 116(2), 1775–1803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05739-4 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

71. Zairul, M. (2020). A thematic review on student-centred learning in the studio education. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(2), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.02.95 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

72. Zairul, M. (2021a). A thematic review on Industrialised Building System (IBS) publications from 2015-2019: Analysis of patterns and trends for future studies of IBS in Malaysia. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(1), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.47836/PJSSH.29.1.35 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

73. Zairul, M. (2021b). The recent trends on prefabricated buildings with circular economy (CE) approach. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100239 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

74. Zairul, M. (2023). Thematic Review template (Patent No. CRLY2023W02032). Controller of Copyright. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

75. Zairul, M., Azli, M., & Azlan, A. (2023). Defying tradition or maintaining the status quo? Moving towards a new hybrid architecture studio education to support blended learning post-COVID-19. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 17(3), 554–573. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

76. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-11-2022-0251 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

77. Zairul, M., Ismail, I. A., Jamil, M. A. M., Azlan, A., Ismail, I. S., Ab Jalil, H., & Sharef, N. M. (2022). Smart Classroom Adoption in Higher Education: A Thematic Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(14). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i14/15825 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

78. Zhang, R., Owen, J. R., Kemp, D., & Shi, G. (2022). An applied framework for assessing the relative deprivation of dam-affected communities. Sustainable Development, 30(1), 176–190. [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

79. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2237 [Google Scholar] [Crossref]

• Re-Validating the Uniqueness of Urban Morphology of the Shekhawati Region Through Reconnaissance Using Hotspot Analysis
• Golden Ages and Emerging Needs: Rethinking old Age Homes as Self Sustained Communities
• The Missing Link between Colonial Jack Arch Roofing and Indigenous Construction Practices in India
• Archiving Kolakopa - A Study on the Present Condition and the Architectural Features of an Evanescing Historic Settlement.
• Analysing Vendor Lock-In in Serverless Architectures